№ 2017/1
Political economy HEYETS Valeriy M.1
1State Organization “Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine”
New pragmatism as an instrument to achieve a better future
ABSTRACT ▼
The article provides the results of a scientific analysis and assessment of the contents of the new pragmatism both as a political economy of the future and a system of opinions of the very policies of the new pragmatism, which, in our opinion, is a challenge of time that requires answers to the crisis in both the economy and the state. The answer to this challenge, according to the understanding of the new pragmatism, may be the solution of the complicated task of generating a new knowledge on the basis of the new pragmatism that we interpret as a conscious economic, social and ethical action, which allow us to consider it a sufficiently integrated system.
Keywords: new pragmatism, socio-economic development, mechanisms of self-regulation, non-economic factors, pragmatic knowledge
JEL: А130
| Article in Russian (pp. 5 - 24) | Download | Downloads :845 |
| Article in Ukrainian (pp. 5 - 24) | Download | Downloads :605 |
REFERENCES ▼
1. Britanika desktop encyclopedia (2006). Vol. 2. Moscow: Astrel; HarvestAST [in Russian].
2. Heyets, V.M. (2014). Society, state, economics: phenomenology of interaction and development. 2-nd ed. Moscow: Jekonomika [in Russian].
3. Heyets, V.M. (2011). The institutions of socialization in Ukraine and the EU: trends and key differences. Ukr. Socium – Ukrainian society, 2(37), 7-34; 3(38), 7-34 [in Ukrainian].
4. Heyets, V. (2009). Society, state, economics: phenomenology of interaction and development. NAS of Ukraine; Institute for economics and forecasting. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
5. Dzhomo, K.S., Popov, V.V. (2016). Long-term trends in income distribution. Zhurnal novoj jekonomicheskoj associacii – Journal of the new economic association, 3, 146 [in Russian].
6. Kolodko, G.V. (2011). The world in motion. Moscow: Magistr [in Russian].
7. Kolodko, G.V. (2014). Where the world goes: the political economy of the future. Moscow: Magistr [in Russian].
8. Kolodko, G.V. (2015). Poland's experience can be useful for Ukraine. Jekonomika Ukrainy – Economy of Ukraine, 6, 38-44 [in Russian].
9. Krize, M. (1993). Modern state – a modest state. Another strategy changes. Svobodnaja mysl – Free thought, 11, 35-43 [in Russian].
10. Mejson, P. (2016). Postcapitalism. Guide to our future. Moscow: Marginempres [in Russian].
11. Nogaev, I.V. (2013). Economic pragmatism rejects the concept of dispersed knowledge F. Hayeka. SShA. Kanada. Jekonomika, Politika. Kultura – USA. Canada. Economy, Politics. Culture, 9, 38-50 [in Russian].
12. Noubul, R. (2013). How to keep science in safe hands. Rossija v globalnoj politike – Russia in global politics, 11: 6, 160 [in Russian].
13. Smit, A. (1997). Theory of moral sentiments. Moscow: Respublika, 1997 [in Russian].
14. Taleb, N.N. (2015). Black swan. Under the sign of unpredictability. Moscow: Kolibri, Azbuka, Attikus [in Russian].
15. Hajek, F.A. (1992). The fatal conceit. Errors of socialism. Moscow: Izd-vo Novosti starring izd-vo Catallaxy [in Russian].
16. Jum, D. (1965). Writings. Vol. 1. Moscow: Mysl [in Russian].
17. Mill, J.S. (1861). Consideration on Representative Government. London: Savil and Edwards, Chandos Street, Covent Garden.
18. Shiva, V. (2013). How economic growth has become anti-life. The Guardian.
19. Stiglitz, G. (2012). The Price of Inequality: How Today's Divided Society Endangers Our Future. NY: W.W. Norton & Company.
English
Ukrainian 
