| . |
English
Ukrainian
|
| HOME |
№ 4/2014
LYSENKO Yurii 1, STRYZHAK А. -2
1Higher Educational Establishment of Ukoopspilka «Poltava University of Economics and Trade»
2Educational and Research Institute of Economic Cybernetics, Donetsk National University
The modern paradigm of institutional traps
| Ekon. teor. 2014; 4:48-60 |
ABSTRACT ▼
The main economic reforms as a factor of institutional reforms in Ukraine are defined. Institutional traps are considered as a result of long-term and stable existence of inefficient institutions in the insti-tutional environment. A definition of institutional trap is proposed, and its features and mechanisms-externalities are pointed out. A conclusion is made about the possibility of exit from institutional traps in two scenarios: revolutionary and evolutionary. Attention is paid to the problem of leveling the indi-viduals’ opportunistic behavior in order to prevent institutional traps.
Keywords:institutional traps, opportunistic behavior, institutions, emerging markets, institutional transformation
JEL: О170
| Article in Russian (pp. 48 - 60) | Download | Downloads :251 |
| Article in Ukrainian (pp. 48 - 60) | Download | Downloads :250 |
REFERENCES ▼
Amosov A. (2001) Makrojekonomicheskaja politika i institucional'nye "lo-vushki". www.promved.ru/dec_2001_03.shtml
Balackij E.V. (2005) Dissertacionnaja lovushka. www.biometrica.tomsk.ru/disser_trap.htm
Balackij E.V. (2010) Global'nye institucional'nye lovushki: sushhnost' i specifika. www.kapital-rus.ru/index.php/articles/article/177993
Brendeleva E.A. (2005) QWERTY-jeffekty, institucional'nye lovushki s tochki zrenija transakcionnyh izderzhek. ecsocman.hse.ru/text/16213316/
Vol'chik V.V. (2011) Institucional'nye lovushki i opportunisticheskoe povedenie v processe razmeshhenija gosudarstvennyh zakazov // Naukovі pracі DonNTU. Serіja: ekonomіchna. Vipusk 39 –1. S. 17–26.
Gricenko A.A. (red) (2008) Institucional'naja arhitektonika i dinamika jekonomicheskih preobrazovanij. Har'kov: Izd-vo Fort. 928 s.
Grishina I.A. (2007) Formirovanie jeffektivnyh institutov v uslovijah sis-temnoj transformacii jekonomiki Rossii. // Naukovі pracі DonNTU. Serіja: ekonomіchna. Vipusk 31–2. S. 154–159.
Kurylo I.O. (2006) Stanovlennia novoho "klasu znannia" v Ukraini: makroeko-nomichni peredumovy, instytutsionalni pastky, poshuky vykhodu // Naukovi pratsi DonNTU. Seriia: ekonomichna. Vypusk 103–4. S. 64–70.
Malkina M.Ju. (2011) Institucional'nye lovushki innovacionnogo razvitija rossijskoj jekonomiki // Journal of Institutional Studies (Zhurnal institu-cional'nyh issledovanij) Tom 3. № 1. S. 50–60.
Mihajlova E.A. (2000) Gisterezis v marketinge: mif ili real'nost'? dis.ru/library/detail.php?ID=22218
Nort D. (1997) Instituty, institucional'nye izmenenija i funkcionirova-nie jekonomiki. M.: Fond jekonomicheskoj knigi "Nachala". 180 s.
Nureev R., Latov Ju. (2006) Chto takoe zavisimost' ot predshestvujushhego raz-vitija i kak ejo izuchajut rossijskie jekonomisty. rustem-nureev.ru/wp-content/uploads/ 2011/01/281.pdf.
Nureev R.M. (red.) (2003) Jekonomicheskie sub#ekty postsovetskoj Rossii (institucional'nyj analiz). Izd. 2-e. V 3 ch. Ch. 3. Gosudarstvo v sovre-mennoj Rossii. M.: Moskovskij obshhestvennyj nauchnyj fond, 2003. 132 s.
Nureev R.M., Latov Ju.V. (2009) Institucional'naja teorija jekonomicheskoj istorii, kotoruju predstoit sozdat': istorija kak konkurencija institutov. // Naukovі pracі DonNTU. Serіja: ekonomіchna. Vipusk 89–1. S. 20–26.
Olejnik A. (2004) "Institucional'nye lovushki" postprivatizacionnogo perioda v Rossii. gpir.narod.ru/ve/662038.htm
Pasєka S.R. (2012) Nebezpeka іnstitucіonal'nih pastok u rozvitku socіal'no-trudovogo potencіalu regіonu. www.economy.nayka.com.ua/?op=1&z=1570
Polterovich V. M. (1999) Institucional'nye lovushki i jekonomicheskie re-formy. // Jekonomika i matematicheskie metody. № 2. S. 1–37.
Sal'tevskaja T.G. (2007) "Institucional'nye lovushki" v modeljah potreble-nija ukrainskogo obshhestva // Naukovі pracі DonNTU. Serіja: ekonomіchna. Vipusk 31–3. S. 27–30.
Spravochnik himika 21. (1972) Uprugo-gisterezisnye svojstva // chem21.info/info/533658/
Suharev O.S. (2008) Institucional'naja jekonomika: teorija i politika. In-t jekonomiki RAN. M.: Nauka. 863 s.
Cirel' S.V. (2005) "QWERTY-jeffekty", "path dependence" i zakon Sedova, ili vozmozhno li vyrashhivanie ustojchivyh institutov v Rossii. ecsocman.hse.ru/text/16213158/
Balackij E.V. (2005) Dissertacionnaja lovushka. www.biometrica.tomsk.ru/disser_trap.htm
Balackij E.V. (2010) Global'nye institucional'nye lovushki: sushhnost' i specifika. www.kapital-rus.ru/index.php/articles/article/177993
Brendeleva E.A. (2005) QWERTY-jeffekty, institucional'nye lovushki s tochki zrenija transakcionnyh izderzhek. ecsocman.hse.ru/text/16213316/
Vol'chik V.V. (2011) Institucional'nye lovushki i opportunisticheskoe povedenie v processe razmeshhenija gosudarstvennyh zakazov // Naukovі pracі DonNTU. Serіja: ekonomіchna. Vipusk 39 –1. S. 17–26.
Gricenko A.A. (red) (2008) Institucional'naja arhitektonika i dinamika jekonomicheskih preobrazovanij. Har'kov: Izd-vo Fort. 928 s.
Grishina I.A. (2007) Formirovanie jeffektivnyh institutov v uslovijah sis-temnoj transformacii jekonomiki Rossii. // Naukovі pracі DonNTU. Serіja: ekonomіchna. Vipusk 31–2. S. 154–159.
Kurylo I.O. (2006) Stanovlennia novoho "klasu znannia" v Ukraini: makroeko-nomichni peredumovy, instytutsionalni pastky, poshuky vykhodu // Naukovi pratsi DonNTU. Seriia: ekonomichna. Vypusk 103–4. S. 64–70.
Malkina M.Ju. (2011) Institucional'nye lovushki innovacionnogo razvitija rossijskoj jekonomiki // Journal of Institutional Studies (Zhurnal institu-cional'nyh issledovanij) Tom 3. № 1. S. 50–60.
Mihajlova E.A. (2000) Gisterezis v marketinge: mif ili real'nost'? dis.ru/library/detail.php?ID=22218
Nort D. (1997) Instituty, institucional'nye izmenenija i funkcionirova-nie jekonomiki. M.: Fond jekonomicheskoj knigi "Nachala". 180 s.
Nureev R., Latov Ju. (2006) Chto takoe zavisimost' ot predshestvujushhego raz-vitija i kak ejo izuchajut rossijskie jekonomisty. rustem-nureev.ru/wp-content/uploads/ 2011/01/281.pdf.
Nureev R.M. (red.) (2003) Jekonomicheskie sub#ekty postsovetskoj Rossii (institucional'nyj analiz). Izd. 2-e. V 3 ch. Ch. 3. Gosudarstvo v sovre-mennoj Rossii. M.: Moskovskij obshhestvennyj nauchnyj fond, 2003. 132 s.
Nureev R.M., Latov Ju.V. (2009) Institucional'naja teorija jekonomicheskoj istorii, kotoruju predstoit sozdat': istorija kak konkurencija institutov. // Naukovі pracі DonNTU. Serіja: ekonomіchna. Vipusk 89–1. S. 20–26.
Olejnik A. (2004) "Institucional'nye lovushki" postprivatizacionnogo perioda v Rossii. gpir.narod.ru/ve/662038.htm
Pasєka S.R. (2012) Nebezpeka іnstitucіonal'nih pastok u rozvitku socіal'no-trudovogo potencіalu regіonu. www.economy.nayka.com.ua/?op=1&z=1570
Polterovich V. M. (1999) Institucional'nye lovushki i jekonomicheskie re-formy. // Jekonomika i matematicheskie metody. № 2. S. 1–37.
Sal'tevskaja T.G. (2007) "Institucional'nye lovushki" v modeljah potreble-nija ukrainskogo obshhestva // Naukovі pracі DonNTU. Serіja: ekonomіchna. Vipusk 31–3. S. 27–30.
Spravochnik himika 21. (1972) Uprugo-gisterezisnye svojstva // chem21.info/info/533658/
Suharev O.S. (2008) Institucional'naja jekonomika: teorija i politika. In-t jekonomiki RAN. M.: Nauka. 863 s.
Cirel' S.V. (2005) "QWERTY-jeffekty", "path dependence" i zakon Sedova, ili vozmozhno li vyrashhivanie ustojchivyh institutov v Rossii. ecsocman.hse.ru/text/16213158/
№ 2/2019
LYSENKO Yurii 1, DALEVSKA Nataliia 2
1Higher Educational Establishment of Ukoopspilka «Poltava University of Economics and Trade»
2 State Higher Education Establishment "Donetsk National Technical University"
Logical methodological principles for developing international political economy
| Ekon. teor. 2019; 2:99-116 | https://doi.org/10.15407/etet2019.02.099 |
ABSTRACT ▼
The authors consider International political economy a comprehensive scientific discipline, combining theoretical fundamental and practical applied lines of studying integrated trends in the structuring of the world political and economic space. The logical and methodological principles of developing international political economy are revealed. Within the civilization paradigm, a configuration of logical forms of international political economy (holism, determinism, informationality) is proposed, which provides an opportunity to study the multi-factor and multi-vector nature of the world economic development and determine the structural transformation of the world order.
The authors investigate the transformational processes of creating the organic global political and economic space and substantiate the socio-institutional tendencies of the world economic development. They also define the guidelines for studying the evolution of the world economic system as a multicomponent characteristic of the world political and eco-nomic space, with due regard to the nature of the logical forms of international political economy.
Keywords: international political economy, global economic development, global political and economic space, international relations, systemic structural transformations, logical forms of international political economy
JEL: F 500; B 410
| Article in Russian (pp. 99 - 116) | Download | Downloads :551 |
| Article in Ukrainian (pp. 99 - 116) | Download | Downloads :484 |
REFERENCES ▼
1. Amin, S. (2009). The globalization of resistance: The struggle in the world. Moscow: Book House and LIBROCOM [in Russian].
2. Archer, C. (1993). International Organizations. London: Routledge.
3. Arrigi, G. (2009). Adam Smith in Beijing: What has the 21st century inherited. Moscow: Institute of Public Design [in Russian].
4. Beck, U., Lau, Kr. (2006). The second modernity as a prospect of research: the "meta-changes" of modern society. Socialnye i gumanitarnye nauki. – Social and Human Sciences. Otechestvennaja i zarubezhnaja literatura – Domestic and foreign literature. Series 11. Sociology, 4, 5-11 [in Russian].
5. Beck, U. (2007). Power and its opponents in the era of globalism. New world political economy. Moscow: Progress-Tradicija; Izdatelskij dom "Territorija budushhego" [in Russian].
6. Bellah, R., Madsen, R. (1991). The Good Society [Robert N. Bellah, Richard Madsen, William Sullivan et al.]. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, Inc.
7. Bilorus, O. (2018) The political economic forecast of global co-development in the XXI century: global post-capitalism abo world-system of information-network globalism. Ekon. teor. – Economic theory, 1, 5-20. doi: https://doi.org/10.15407/etet2018.01.005">doi.org/10.15407/etet2018.01.005">https://doi.org/10.15407/etet2018.01.005 [in Ukrainian].
8. Carr, E. (2001). Twenty Years’ Crisis 1919–1939: An Introduction to the Study of International Relations. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
9. Castells, M. (2000). Information Age: the economy, society, culture. Moscow: HU-VSHE [in Russian].
10. Chistilin, D. (2004). Self-organization of the world economy. Eurasian aspect. Moscow: Economy [in Russian].
11. Dakhin, A. (2010). The system of "business-power": theoretical issues of formation in the light of a synergistic approach. Vlast – Power, 11, 4-10 [in Russian].
12. Ferguson, Y., Mansbach, R. (1996). Polities. Authority, Identities and Change. South Carolina: University of South Carolina Press.
13. Filipenko, A. (2012). Political economy of the world economy. Zhurnal Yevropeiskoi ekonomiky – Journal of European economics, 11: 1, 4-13 [in Ukrainian].
14. Fukuyama, F. (2004). The great gap. Moscow: ACT Publishing LLC: Ermak ZAO [in Russian].
15. Gilpin, R. (1981). War and Change in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511664267">doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511664267">https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511664267
16. Grieve, F. (1979). Transnationalism in world politics and business. New York: Pergamon Press.
17. Haken, G. (2000). The basic concepts of synergy. Synergetic paradigm. The variety of searches and approaches. Moscow: Progress-Tradicija [in Russian].
18. Halchinsky, A. (2012). Economic development: methodology of a renewed paradigm. Ekonomika Ukrainy – Economy of Ukraine, 5, 4-17 [in Ukrainian].
19. Hegel, G. (1972). Science of logic: in 3 volumes. V. 3. Moscow: Mysl [in Russian].
20. Hnatiuk, M.M. (2014). The international actor and a political subjectness in the discourse of realist and liberal approaches. Naukovi zapysky NaUKMA. Politychni nauky – Scientific notes of NaUKMA. Political science, 160, 44-48 [in Ukrainian].
21. Hoffmann, S. (2002, July/August). Clash of Globalizations: Foreign Affairs. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/20033243">doi.org/10.2307/20033243">https://doi.org/10.2307/20033243
22. Hrytsenko, A. (2012). Political economics: topicality of the current issues, methodological potential, and coherence with institutionalism. Ekon. teor. – Economic theory, 1, 5-20 [in Ukrainian].
23. Huntington, S.Ph. (1993). The Clash of Civilizations? Foreign Affairs, 72, 3, 22-49. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/20045621">doi.org/10.2307/20045621">https://doi.org/10.2307/20045621
24. Kaliuzhny, V. (2009). The contours of the world order in the twenty-first century. (theoretical analysis). Vlast – Power, 11, 75-78 [in Russian].
25. Keohane, R., Nye, J. (eds.). (1972). Transnational Relations and World Politics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. doi: https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674593152">doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674593152">https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674593152
26. Kornivska, V. (2011). Modern tendencies in developing the global economic and institutional space. Ekon. teor. – Economic theory, 3, 36-45 [in Ukrainian].
27. Laszlo, E. (1975). The meaning and significance of General System Theory. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 20: 1, 9-24. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/bs.3830200103">doi.org/10.1002/bs.3830200103">https://doi.org/10.1002/bs.3830200103
28. Laszlo, E. (1991). The Age of Bifurcation: The Key to Understanding the Changing World. New York, London: Gordon & Breach Publishing Group, 3, 126.
29. Lucas, M. (1999). Nationalism, sovereignty and supranational organizations. Hamburg.
30. Luhmann, N. (2004). Society as a social system. Moscow: Logos [in Russian].
31. Mathieu, L. (1985). Let us save the Earth. Moscow: Progress [in Russian].
32. Morgenthau, H. J. (1948). Politics among nations: the struggle for power and peace. New York: Knopf.
33. Pakhomov, Y. (2008). Bifurcation status of the world system core on the eve of changing the world leaders. Ekonomika Ukrainy – Economy of Ukraine, 4, 4-14 [in Ukrainian].
34. Pestel, E. (1988). Beyond the growth limits. Moscow: Progress [in Russian].
35. Prigozhin, I., Stenguers, I. (1986). Order from Chaos: A New Dialogue between a Man and the Nature. Moscow: Progress [in Russian].
36. Rosenau, J. (2006). The Study of World Politics. Vol. 1: theoretical and methodological challenges. London, New York: Routledge. doi: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203014721">doi.org/10.4324/9780203014721">https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203014721
37. Ruggie, J. (1982). International Regimes, Transactions, and Change: Embedded Liberalism in the Postwar Economic System. International Organization, 36, 2, 379-415. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300018993">doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300018993">https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300018993
38. Savchuk, V.S. (2011). International, or global, political economy. Market economy formation: collection of scientific papers, special issue Methodological issues of current political economics. Kiev: KNEU, 175-185 [in Ukrainian].
39. Schumpeter, J. (1995). Capitalism, socialism and democracy [trans. from English. Foreword and total ed. by V. Avtonomov]. Moscow: Economy, 540 p. [in Russian].
40. Snezhko, E. (2012). Land depletion. Investgazeta – Investnewspaper, 4, 4-5 [in Russian].
41. Stiglitz, J. (2003). Globalization: disturbing trends. Moscow: Nacionalnyj obshhestvenno-nauchnyj fond [in Russian].
42. Tarasevich, V. (2015) Economic socio-dynamics in the philosophical domain of economic and theoretical knowledge. Ekonomika Ukrainy – Economy of Ukraine, 1, 42-59 [in Ukrainian].
43. Toffler, E. (2004). The third wave. Moscow: AST [in Russian].
44. Wallerstein, I., Clesse, A. (2003). The World We Are Entering 2000-2050. Amsterdam: Dutch University Press.
45. Waltz, K. (1979). Theory of international politics. Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley Pub. Co.
46. Wolfson, M., Kotz, D. (2009). A Re-conceptualization of SSA Theory. Retrieved from people.umass.edu/dmkotz/Reconcep_SSA_Th_09_01. pdf
47. Zapf, W. (1979). Modernization and welfare development: The case of Germany. Social Science Information, 12, 2, 219-246. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/053901847901800203">doi.org/10.1177/053901847901800203">https://doi.org/10.1177/053901847901800203
2. Archer, C. (1993). International Organizations. London: Routledge.
3. Arrigi, G. (2009). Adam Smith in Beijing: What has the 21st century inherited. Moscow: Institute of Public Design [in Russian].
4. Beck, U., Lau, Kr. (2006). The second modernity as a prospect of research: the "meta-changes" of modern society. Socialnye i gumanitarnye nauki. – Social and Human Sciences. Otechestvennaja i zarubezhnaja literatura – Domestic and foreign literature. Series 11. Sociology, 4, 5-11 [in Russian].
5. Beck, U. (2007). Power and its opponents in the era of globalism. New world political economy. Moscow: Progress-Tradicija; Izdatelskij dom "Territorija budushhego" [in Russian].
6. Bellah, R., Madsen, R. (1991). The Good Society [Robert N. Bellah, Richard Madsen, William Sullivan et al.]. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, Inc.
7. Bilorus, O. (2018) The political economic forecast of global co-development in the XXI century: global post-capitalism abo world-system of information-network globalism. Ekon. teor. – Economic theory, 1, 5-20. doi: https://doi.org/10.15407/etet2018.01.005">doi.org/10.15407/etet2018.01.005">https://doi.org/10.15407/etet2018.01.005 [in Ukrainian].
8. Carr, E. (2001). Twenty Years’ Crisis 1919–1939: An Introduction to the Study of International Relations. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
9. Castells, M. (2000). Information Age: the economy, society, culture. Moscow: HU-VSHE [in Russian].
10. Chistilin, D. (2004). Self-organization of the world economy. Eurasian aspect. Moscow: Economy [in Russian].
11. Dakhin, A. (2010). The system of "business-power": theoretical issues of formation in the light of a synergistic approach. Vlast – Power, 11, 4-10 [in Russian].
12. Ferguson, Y., Mansbach, R. (1996). Polities. Authority, Identities and Change. South Carolina: University of South Carolina Press.
13. Filipenko, A. (2012). Political economy of the world economy. Zhurnal Yevropeiskoi ekonomiky – Journal of European economics, 11: 1, 4-13 [in Ukrainian].
14. Fukuyama, F. (2004). The great gap. Moscow: ACT Publishing LLC: Ermak ZAO [in Russian].
15. Gilpin, R. (1981). War and Change in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511664267">doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511664267">https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511664267
16. Grieve, F. (1979). Transnationalism in world politics and business. New York: Pergamon Press.
17. Haken, G. (2000). The basic concepts of synergy. Synergetic paradigm. The variety of searches and approaches. Moscow: Progress-Tradicija [in Russian].
18. Halchinsky, A. (2012). Economic development: methodology of a renewed paradigm. Ekonomika Ukrainy – Economy of Ukraine, 5, 4-17 [in Ukrainian].
19. Hegel, G. (1972). Science of logic: in 3 volumes. V. 3. Moscow: Mysl [in Russian].
20. Hnatiuk, M.M. (2014). The international actor and a political subjectness in the discourse of realist and liberal approaches. Naukovi zapysky NaUKMA. Politychni nauky – Scientific notes of NaUKMA. Political science, 160, 44-48 [in Ukrainian].
21. Hoffmann, S. (2002, July/August). Clash of Globalizations: Foreign Affairs. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/20033243">doi.org/10.2307/20033243">https://doi.org/10.2307/20033243
22. Hrytsenko, A. (2012). Political economics: topicality of the current issues, methodological potential, and coherence with institutionalism. Ekon. teor. – Economic theory, 1, 5-20 [in Ukrainian].
23. Huntington, S.Ph. (1993). The Clash of Civilizations? Foreign Affairs, 72, 3, 22-49. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/20045621">doi.org/10.2307/20045621">https://doi.org/10.2307/20045621
24. Kaliuzhny, V. (2009). The contours of the world order in the twenty-first century. (theoretical analysis). Vlast – Power, 11, 75-78 [in Russian].
25. Keohane, R., Nye, J. (eds.). (1972). Transnational Relations and World Politics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. doi: https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674593152">doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674593152">https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674593152
26. Kornivska, V. (2011). Modern tendencies in developing the global economic and institutional space. Ekon. teor. – Economic theory, 3, 36-45 [in Ukrainian].
27. Laszlo, E. (1975). The meaning and significance of General System Theory. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 20: 1, 9-24. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/bs.3830200103">doi.org/10.1002/bs.3830200103">https://doi.org/10.1002/bs.3830200103
28. Laszlo, E. (1991). The Age of Bifurcation: The Key to Understanding the Changing World. New York, London: Gordon & Breach Publishing Group, 3, 126.
29. Lucas, M. (1999). Nationalism, sovereignty and supranational organizations. Hamburg.
30. Luhmann, N. (2004). Society as a social system. Moscow: Logos [in Russian].
31. Mathieu, L. (1985). Let us save the Earth. Moscow: Progress [in Russian].
32. Morgenthau, H. J. (1948). Politics among nations: the struggle for power and peace. New York: Knopf.
33. Pakhomov, Y. (2008). Bifurcation status of the world system core on the eve of changing the world leaders. Ekonomika Ukrainy – Economy of Ukraine, 4, 4-14 [in Ukrainian].
34. Pestel, E. (1988). Beyond the growth limits. Moscow: Progress [in Russian].
35. Prigozhin, I., Stenguers, I. (1986). Order from Chaos: A New Dialogue between a Man and the Nature. Moscow: Progress [in Russian].
36. Rosenau, J. (2006). The Study of World Politics. Vol. 1: theoretical and methodological challenges. London, New York: Routledge. doi: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203014721">doi.org/10.4324/9780203014721">https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203014721
37. Ruggie, J. (1982). International Regimes, Transactions, and Change: Embedded Liberalism in the Postwar Economic System. International Organization, 36, 2, 379-415. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300018993">doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300018993">https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300018993
38. Savchuk, V.S. (2011). International, or global, political economy. Market economy formation: collection of scientific papers, special issue Methodological issues of current political economics. Kiev: KNEU, 175-185 [in Ukrainian].
39. Schumpeter, J. (1995). Capitalism, socialism and democracy [trans. from English. Foreword and total ed. by V. Avtonomov]. Moscow: Economy, 540 p. [in Russian].
40. Snezhko, E. (2012). Land depletion. Investgazeta – Investnewspaper, 4, 4-5 [in Russian].
41. Stiglitz, J. (2003). Globalization: disturbing trends. Moscow: Nacionalnyj obshhestvenno-nauchnyj fond [in Russian].
42. Tarasevich, V. (2015) Economic socio-dynamics in the philosophical domain of economic and theoretical knowledge. Ekonomika Ukrainy – Economy of Ukraine, 1, 42-59 [in Ukrainian].
43. Toffler, E. (2004). The third wave. Moscow: AST [in Russian].
44. Wallerstein, I., Clesse, A. (2003). The World We Are Entering 2000-2050. Amsterdam: Dutch University Press.
45. Waltz, K. (1979). Theory of international politics. Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley Pub. Co.
46. Wolfson, M., Kotz, D. (2009). A Re-conceptualization of SSA Theory. Retrieved from people.umass.edu/dmkotz/Reconcep_SSA_Th_09_01. pdf
47. Zapf, W. (1979). Modernization and welfare development: The case of Germany. Social Science Information, 12, 2, 219-246. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/053901847901800203">doi.org/10.1177/053901847901800203">https://doi.org/10.1177/053901847901800203
Сalendar of events
| M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ||||||
| 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
| 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 |
| 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 |
| 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | ||||||
© Institute for economics and forecasting 2024. All rights reserved
