Articles by : Lahutin Vasyl D.№ 4/2006
Political economyLAHUTIN Vasyl D.1
1Kyiv National University of Trade and Economics
Economic policy of the state: essence, stages, mechanisms
ABSTRACT ▼
The author analyzes the theoretical essence of economic policy on the basis of separation of its different stages. The article focuses on the problem of interaction between policy and the process of realization of the society's interests. The author reveals the content of discretional and nondiscretional mechanisms of economic policy.
Keywords:
| Article in Russian (pp. 16 - 27) | Download | Downloads :660 |
| Article in Ukrainian (pp. 16 - 27) | Download | Downloads :1367 |
REFERENCES ▼
№ 1/2010
Political economyLAHUTIN Vasyl D.1
1Kyiv National University of Trade and Economics
Theoretico-methodological approaches to the modern problems of labor compensation
ABSTRACT ▼
The article considers theoretico-methodological foundations of research on labor compensation in the context of economic relations between capital and hired labor. The author justifies the necessity of systemic analysis of labor compensation as unity and interaction of the phases of national reproduction. Special attention is given to the interrelation between the value and measure of labor and the measure of money (material) compensation for it.
Keywords:
JEL:
| Article in Russian (pp. 29 - 38) | Download | Downloads :513 |
| Article in Ukrainian (pp. 29 - 38) | Download | Downloads :583 |
REFERENCES ▼
№ 4/2015
Political economyLAHUTIN Vasyl D.1
1Kyiv National University of Trade and Economics
Monopoly and competition policy: political and economic issues
ABSTRACT ▼
The article considers various political and economic approaches to the causes and effects of competition and monopoly on the market. The author analyzes the problem of contents and priority directions of antitrust and competition policies, and highlights a complex set of forms of competition and monopoly in the modern market economy.
Keywords:competition, monopoly, anti-monopolistic policy, competition policy.
JEL: В400, D410, L120, L400
| Article in Russian (pp. 89 - 97) | Download | Downloads :484 |
| Article in Ukrainian (pp. 89 - 97) | Download | Downloads :982 |
REFERENCES ▼
Avdasheva S.B., Shastitko A.E. (2010) Konkurentnaja politika: sostav, struktura, sistema. Sovremennaja konkurencija. № 1. S. 5–20.
Andrejashhenko E., Zazdravnyh A. (2014) K voprosu o metodologii analiza kartel'nyh soglashenij. Voprosy jekonomiki. № 9. S. 53–64.
Armentano D.T. (2005) Antitrast protiv konkurencii. M.: Al'pina Biznes Buks.
Gricenko A.A. (2005) Razvitie form obmena, stoimosti i deneg. K.: Osnova.
Mjejson Je. (2003) Cenovaja i proizvodstvennaja politika krupnogo predprijatija. Vehi jekonomicheskoj mysli. Teorija otraslevyh rynkov. T. 5. SPb.: Jekonomicheskaja shkola. S. 13–34.
Nort D. (1997) Instituty, institucional'nye izmenenija i funkcioniro-vanie jekonomiki. M.: Fond jekonomicheskoj knigi "NAChALA".
Robinson Dzh. (1986) Jekonomicheskaja teorija nesovershennoj konkurencii. M.: Progress.
Stigler Dzh. (1995) Sovershennaja konkurencija: istoricheskij rakurs. Vehi jekonomicheskoj mysli. Teorija firmy. Vyp. 2. SPb.: Jekonomicheskaja shkola. S. 299–328.
Telser L.G. (2003) Zachem proizvoditeljam spravedlivaja torgovlja? Vehi jekonomicheskoj mysli. Teorija otraslevyh rynkov. T. 5. SPb.: Jekonomicheskaja shkola. S. 247–279.
Shumpeter J.A. (1995). Kapitalizm, socializm i demokratija. M.: Jekonomika.
№ 2/2017
Political economyLAHUTIN Vasyl D.1
1Kyiv National University of Trade and Economics
Stability of social development: interdisciplinary research experience
ABSTRACT ▼
The problems of sustainable social development in the context of interdisciplinary research have been analysed, the main factors for social and economic stability in Ukrainian society have been identified. The article highlights the priorities of transition to the new models of social stability in Ukraine, as well as the associated economic risks and restrictions.
Keywords: stability, instability, social development, social development models, values, middle class, oligarchy.
JEL: A120:O110
| Article in Russian (pp. 5 - 18) | Download | Downloads :597 |
| Article in Ukrainian (pp. 5 - 18) | Download | Downloads :627 |
REFERENCES ▼
1. Avtonomov, V.S. (1998). Model of man in economics. St. Petersburg: Jekonomicheskaja shkola [in Russian].
2. Apresjan, R.G., Gusejnov, A.A. (Ed.). (2001). Ethics. Encyclopedic Dictionary. Moscow: Gardariki [in Russian].
3. Artemova, T. (2015). Political economy as a valuable bulwark of socio-economic modernization. Ekon. teor. – Economic theory, 4 [in Ukrainian].
4. Bazilevich, V., Il'in, V. (2010). Metaphysics of Economics. 2-th ed. Kyiv: Znannja; Moscow: Rybari [in Russian].
5. Boulding, K.Je. (2002). Economic science and social systems. Panorama jekonomicheskoj mysli konca XX stoletija – Panorama of economic thought of the late XX century, 2. St. Petersburg: Jekonomicheskaja shkola [in Russian].
6. Danilova, A.I. (Ed.). (2003). Sociological Encyclopedia. Minsk: Belaruskaja Jencyklapedija [in Russian].
7. Evstigneeva, L.P., Evstigneev, R.N. (2010). Economy as a synergetic system. Moscow: LENAND [in Russian].
8. Filipenko, A.S. (2016). Folk, solidarity economy: conceptual sketch. Ekonomika Ukrainy – Economy of Ukraine, 6 [in Ukrainian].
9. Ford, G. (1989). My life, my achievements. Moscow: Politizdat [in Russian].
10. Havel, V. (2016). The power of the impotent. Kyiv: Cheska biblioteka [in Ukrainian].
11. Halchynskyi, A. (2015). Political No Economy. Ekon. teor. – Economic theory, 3 [in Ukrainian].
12. Heyets, V. (2009). Society, state, economics: phenomenology of interaction and development. Institute for economics and forecasting, NAS of Ukraine. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
13. Heyets, V. (2015). Political and economic principles of research of modern society. Ekon. teor. – Economic theory, 3 [in Ukrainian].
14. Hlushchenko, O. (2016). Reciprocal exchange: the dialectic of development and forms of manifestation in the conditions of information and network society. Ekon. teor. – Economic theory, 1 [in Ukrainian].
15. Hrytsenko, A.A. (2016). Ukraine's economy on the path to inclusive development. Ekon. prognozuvannâ – Economy and forecasting, 2. doi:
https://doi.org/10.15407/eip2016.02.007">doi.org/10.15407/eip2016.02.007">https://doi.org/10.15407/eip2016.02.007 [in Ukrainian].
16. Kozlovski, P. (1999). Principles of ethical economy. St. Petersburg: Jekonomicheskaja shkola [in Russian].
17. Kolodko, G.V. (2014). Where the world goes: the political economy of the future. Moscow: Magistr [in Russian].
18. Korablin, S.O. (2016). The "lagging growth" model: economic factors and implications for Ukraine. Ekon. prognozuvannâ – Economy and forecasting, 2. doi:
https://doi.org/10.15407/eip2016.02.071">doi.org/10.15407/eip2016.02.071">https://doi.org/10.15407/eip2016.02.071 [in Ukrainian].
19. Libanova, E. (2008). Valuable orientations and social realities of Ukrainian society. Ekonomika Ukrainy – Economy of Ukraine, 10 [in Ukrainian].
20. Mazaraki, A. (2010). Trade: history, civilization, morality. Kyiv: Kniga [in Russian].
21. Mazaraki, A., Il'in, V. (2004). Philosophy of money. Kyiv National trade and economic institute. Kyiv: KNTJeU [in Russian].
22. Marshall, A. (1993). Principles of economic science, vol. I. Moscow: Progress-Univers [in Russian].
23. Merton, R. (2006). Social theory and social structure. Moscow: AST: AST MOSKVA: HRANITEL [in Russian].
24. Mizes, L. fon. (2008). Human activity: a treatise on economic theory. Chelyabinsk: Socium [in Russian].
25. Parsons, T. (1998). The system of modern societies. Moscow: Aspekt-Press [in Russian].
26. Piketti, T. (2016). Capital in the twenty-first century. Kyiv: Nash format [in Ukrainian].
27. Polan'i, K. (2002). Economics as an institutionalized process. Jekonomicheskaja sociologija – Economic sociology, 3: 2 [in Russian].
28. Rotbard, M. (2009). Psychology, value judgments and public policy. Jekonomicheskaja politika – Economic policy, 3 [in Russian].
29. Yeshchenko, P.S. (2014). The world needs a new vector of development: from bubbleeconomics – to the human economy. Ekonomika Ukrainy – Economy of Ukraine, 6 [in Ukrainian].
30. Zvieriakov, M.I. (2015). About changing the model of economic development. Ekonomika Ukrainy – Economy of Ukraine, 6 [in Ukrainian].
31. Etzioni, A. (1988) The Moral Dimension: Toward a New Economics. New York; London.
32. Klitgaard, R. (1988). Controlling corruption. University of California Press.
33. Lutz, M.A., Lux, K. (1988). Humanistic Economics. New York.
34. Rothbard, M. (1998). The Ethics of Liberty. New York: University Press.
35. Stigler, G. (1971). The Theory of Economic Regulation. Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, 2 (Spring). doi:
https://doi.org/10.2307/3003160">doi.org/10.2307/3003160">https://doi.org/10.2307/3003160
36. Ulrich, P. (1987). Transformation der ökonomischen Vernunft. 2 Aufl. Bern; Stuttgart [in German].
№ 1/2020
Political economyMAZARAKI A. 1, LAHUTIN Vasyl D.2
1Kyiv National University of Trade and Economics
2Kyiv National University of Trade and Economics
Prospects of methodological change in the economic theory of the XXI century
ABSTRACT ▼
The state and prospects of evolution of methodology of economic theory are considered. The content and social significance of scientific research in economic theory as a process of objective cognition of socio-economic reality, the achievement of truth, are revealed. Methodological changes are analyzed in the context of the transformation of the object and subject of science, the system of categories, the paradigm of researches. The conclusion about the objective need to formulate an updated methodology of economic theory in response to the acute challenges of development of economy and society in the 21st century is substantiated. The societal demand for economic theory and its methodology increases when there are dramatic socio-economic transformations and largescale changes in economic relations. Theoretical evidences are provided that for systematic cognition of present and future of economy the application of a scientific methodology that enables the synergetic study of economic systems are required. The synergistic methodological paradigm becomes the most promising. Prospects of methodological changes in modern economic theory are proved to be connected with the expansion of the possibilities of categorical analysis of the subject of science. These points outline the transcendental content of such fundamental economic categories as value and capital. Value is the objective basis on which the categorical series of economic theory emerges and are formed. The necessity to expand the role of metaphysical reflections and interdisciplinary methodological approaches has been highlighted and characterized. It is shown that interdisciplinary research allows to bring economic theory closer to solving socially important problems. The author's vision of the methodological problem of demarcation in modern economic theory is proposed. The methodological triad of "objective reali-ty - unbiased analysis - reliable results" comes to the fore.
Keywords:methodology, paradigm, reflection, metaphysics, transcendence, categories, val-ue, capital, demarcation
JEL: B40
| Article in English (pp. 5 - 18) |
| Article in Russian (pp. 5 - 18) | Download | Downloads :473 |
| Article in Ukrainian (pp. 5 - 18) | Download | Downloads :442 |
REFERENCES ▼
1. Halchynskyi, A. (2009). Methodology for the analysis of economic globaliza-tion: the logic of renewal. Ekonomika Ukrainy – Economy of Ukraine, 1, 4-18 [in Ukrainian].
2. Gorc, A. (2010). Intangible. Knowledge, value and capital. Moscow: Izd. dom gos. un-ta i Vysshej shkoly jekonomiki [in Russian].
3. Hrytsenko, A. (2008). Economic theory in the modern world. Ekonomika Ukrainy – Economy of Ukraine, 10, 40-54 [in Ukrainian].
4. Hrytsenko, A. (2005). The development of forms of exchange, value and money. Kiev: Osnova [in Russian].
5. Yeshchenko, P. (2018). Search of a new model for socio-economic devel-opment – a priority task of social sciences. Ekon. teor. – Economic theory, 4, 35-56 [in Ukrainian].
doi.org/10.15407/etet2018.04.035
6. Yeshchenko, P.S., Arseienko, A.H. (2011). A new paradigm of economic development – the imperative of our time. Ekon. prognozuvannâ – Economy and forecasting, 1, 28-47 [in Ukrainian].
7. Zaitsev, Yu.K., Moskalenko, O.M. (2018). Contemporary Political Economy as the Theoretical Basis for Economic Development of Society Book. I. Philosoph-ical and methodological foundations of the architecture of the subject of modern political economy. Kyiv: KNTEU [in Ukrainian].
8. Zvieriakov, M. (2018). Theoretical paradigm for sustainable development and Ukrainian realities. Ekonomika Ukrainy – Economy of Ukraine, 10, 10-31 [in Ukrainian].
9. Laks, M. (2016). Metaphysics: A Modern Introductory Course. Kyiv: Dukh i Litera [in Ukrainian].
10. McCloskey, D. (2012). The rhetoric of this economic science. Philosophy of Economics. Anthology. Moscow: Izd-vo Instituta Gajdara [in Russian].
11. Piketty, T. (2016). Capital in the twenty-first century. Kyiv: Nash Format [in Ukrainian].
doi.org/10.4159/9780674982918
12. Polanyi, K. (2010). Selected works. Moscow: Izd. dom "Territorija budushhego" [in Russian].
13. Rodrick, D. (2016). Economics decides: the strength and weakness of "dark science". Moscow: Izd-vo Instituta Gajdara [in Russian].
14. Sidenko, V. (2016). Methodological principles of the analysis of global crisis processes. Ekon. teor. – Economic theory, 2, 85-99 [in Ukrainian].
doi.org/10.15407/etet2016.02.085
15. Tarasevych, V.M. (2018). The Problems of Truth in World Economic Science. Ekonomika Ukrainy – Economy of Ukraine, 10, 88-100 [in Ukrainian].
16. Filipenko, A. (2018). Economic world: philosophy. Ekon. teor. – Economic theory, 3, 29-44 [in Ukrainian].
doi.org/10.15407/etet2018.03.029
17. Angner, E. (2019). Were all behavioral economists now. Journal of Eco-nomic Methodology, 26: 3, 195-207.
doi.org/10.1080/1350178X.2019.1625210
18. Beinhocker, E. D. (2013). Reflexivity, complexity and the nature of social science. Journal of Economic Methodology, 20: 2, 330-342.
doi.org/10.1080/1350178X.2013.859403
19. Bohm, D. (1980) Wholeness and the Implicate Order. London: Rotledge.
20. Hausman, D. M., McPherson M. S. (2006). Economic Analysis, Moral Phi-losophy, and Public Policy. Cambridge University Press.
doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511754289
21. Macdonald, C. (2005). Varieties of things: foundations of contemporary metaphysics. Oxfod: Blackweell.
doi.org/10.1002/9780470775684
22. Popper, K. (1969). Science: Conjectures and Refutations. Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge. London: Routledge.
23. Ross, Dm (2014). Philosophy of economics. New York: Palgrave Macmil-lan.
doi.org/10.1057/9781137318756
24. Schwab, K. (2016). The Forth Industrial Revolution. Geneva: World Eco-nomic Forum.
English
Ukrainian 
