.
Увійти 
|
HOME |
№ 1/2004
1Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine
The evolution of price-forming market mechanisms
Ekon. teor. 2004; 1:0-0 |
ABSTRACT ▼
The article deals with the phenomenon of modification of the value law under imperfect competition. The author considers the evolution of priceforming market mechanisms from the system of equilibrium prices to the institute of marketing in the context of a comprehensive methodology based on spatialtemporal approach to the interpretation of the economic concept of value.
Keywords:
Article in Russian (pp. 43 - 56) | Download | Downloads :640 |
Article in Ukrainian (pp. 43 - 55) | Download | Downloads :619 |
REFERENCES ▼
№ 1/2005
1Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine
The sources of value relations
Ekon. teor. 2005; 1:0-0 |
ABSTRACT ▼
The author considers the problem of formation of the methodology of modern economic theory in the context of space time approach. On that basis, she tries to follow the sources of the relations of economic value, which are located in the heart of the economic organization of primitive society – the cradle of the developed socio economic system.
Keywords:
Article in Russian (pp. 3 - 17) | Download | Downloads :531 |
Article in Ukrainian (pp. 3 - 16) | Download | Downloads :622 |
REFERENCES ▼
№ 3/2007
1Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine
The institute of measure of economic value
Ekon. teor. 2007; 3:0-0 |
ABSTRACT ▼
The article deals with the theoretical approaches to the phenomenon of money as an institute of economic value. The author tries to clarify the essence of the problem of economic measures through the notion of economic good.
Keywords:
Article in Russian (pp. 35 - 56) | Download | Downloads :569 |
Article in Ukrainian (pp. 35 - 55) | Download | Downloads :571 |
REFERENCES ▼
№ 3/2010
1Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine
Economics of trust as a preimage of institutional architectonics
Ekon. teor. 2010; 3:0-0 |
ABSTRACT ▼
Keywords:
Article in Russian (pp. 60 - 68) | Download | Downloads :544 |
Article in Ukrainian (pp. 60 - 67) | Download | Downloads :613 |
REFERENCES ▼
№ 2/2011
1Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine
Methodological Anatomy of the Global Financial and Economic Crisis
Ekon. teor. 2011; 2:0-0 |
ABSTRACT ▼
The origins of the global financial and economic crisis are traced in the perspective of methodology of values. The author links the tackling of systemic socio-economic destabilization of the end of the XX – beginning of the XXI century with the necessity to formulate the logic of the "Middle Way" that leans upon the new pattern of overall economic balance of the entire economic system.
Keywords:
Article in Russian (pp. 16 - 33) | Download | Downloads :562 |
Article in Ukrainian (pp. 16 - 33) | Download | Downloads :575 |
REFERENCES ▼
№ 2/2014
1Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine
A clean moral science: about the self-justification of "fundamental” scientific knowledge in the age of global modernization
Ekon. teor. 2014; 2:5-20 |
ABSTRACT ▼
The article reveals the content of "fundamental” scientific knowledge as a carrier of moral reference points in the global socio-economic transformations. The author comprehends the contribution of the noosphere conception and the legacy of the classical German philosophy in the justification of the worldview principles of free scientific search. The article highlights the creative mission of economic theory as a value stronghold for the modernization of economic practice and formation of a reasonable society corresponding to harmonic institutional architectonics
Keywords:fundamental knowledge, global transformations, economic theory, institutional architectonics
JEL: В410, В490
Article in Russian (pp. 5 - 20) | Download | Downloads :570 |
Article in Ukrainian (pp. 5 - 20) | Download | Downloads :589 |
REFERENCES ▼
Akvinskij Foma (2006) Summa teologii. Chast' I–II. Voprosy 1–48. –Kiev: Jel'ga, Nika-Centr.
Amosov A. (2014) Ob jekonomicheskom mehanizme novogo industrial'nogo razvitija // Jekonomist. №2. S. 3 – 12.
Artemova T.I. (2011) Metodologicheskaja anatomija global'nogo finansovo-jekonomicheskogo krizisa // Jekonomicheskaja teorija. №2. S. 16–33.
Aubakirova G.O. (2013) O programme novoj industrializacii respubliki Kazahstan // Jekonomist. №10. S. 59–69.
Bergson A. Tvorcheskaja jevoljucija. M.: TERRA-knizhnyj klub, 2001.
Bogomolov O. (2007) Nravstvennyj faktor social'no-jekonomicheskogo progressa // Voprosy jekonomiki. № 11. S. 55–62.
Vardomskij L., Shurubovich A. (2011) Faktory i modeli modernizacii jekonomik stran SNG // Mir peremen. № 3. S.43–58.
Varnavskij V. (2010) Mirovoj krizis i rynok infrastrukturnyh proektov // Mirovaja jekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnoshenija. № 1. S. 38–46.
Vernadskij V.I. (1991) Nauchnaja mysl' kak planetnoe javlenie. M.: Nauka.
Vlasova O. (2010) Krizis pomog Rossii zadumat'sja o modernizacii // Jekspert. № 37. S. 102–103.
Ganelin V.G. (2008) Chto takoe zhizn' s tochki zrenija geologa. Perechityvaja V.I. Vernadskogo // Voprosy filosofii. №6. S. 66 – 81.
Geєc' V.M. (2010) Liberal'no-demokratichni zasadi: kurs na modernizaciju Ukraїni // Ekonomika Ukraїni. №3. S. 4 – 20.
Glaz'ev S. (2010) Strategija operezhajushhego razvitija Rossii v uslovijah global'nogo krizisa // Rossijskij jekonomicheskij zhurnal. № 3. S. 93–100.
Glaz'ev S. (2013) Snova k al'ternativnoj sisteme mer gosudarstvennoj politiki modernizacii i razvitija otechestvennoj jekonomiki (predlozhenija na 2013–2014 gg.) // Rossijskij jekonomicheskij zhurnal. №3. S. 3–37.
Glaz'ev S., Fetisov G.(2014) Novyj kurs: strategija proryva // Jekonomicheskie strategii. № 1,2,4.
Gosudarstvennaja jekonomicheskaja politika i Jekonomicheskaja doktrina Rossii. K umnoj nravstvennoj jekonomike: v 5 t. (2008) M.: Nauchnyj jekspert.
Dalmajr F. (2013) Sekuljarnyj vek? Razmyshlenija o Charl'ze Tejlore i Rajmone Panikkare // Voprosy filosofii. №10. S. 77–90.
Dmitriev Ju., Frajmovich D. (2014) Dinamicheskoe razvitie social'no-jekonomicheskih sistem: problemy modernizacii // Problemy teorii i praktiki upravlenija. №2.
Doklad o razvitii cheloveka (2004) Kul'turnaja svoboda v sovremennom mnogoobraznom mire. M.: Izdatel'stvo “Ves' mir”.
Zvєrjakov M. (2010) Liberal'na ideja i modernizacija ekonomiki Ukraїni // Ekonomika Ukraїni. №7. – S. 11– 27.
Ivanov P. (2009) O dobryh namerenijah // Svobodnaja mysl'. № 9.S. 61–76.
Inozemcev V.L. (1999) (red.) Novaja postindustrial'naja volna na Zapade: antologija. M.: Academia.
Kant I. (1995) (a) Osnovy metafiziki nravstvennosti // Kritika prakticheskogo razuma. – SPb.: Nauka. S.53–119.
Kant I. (1995) (b) Kritika prakticheskogo razuma // Kritika prakticheskogo razuma. – SPb.: Nauka. S.121–258.
Kirvel' Ch. (2008) Problemy duhovnogo vakuuma // Svobodnaja mysl'. №6. S.171–180.
Kiselev G.S. (2011) Religioznye smysly mira cheloveka // Voprosy filosofii. № 5. S.18–29.
Kolmogorov A.N. (1964) Zhizn' i myshlenie kak osobye formy sushhestvovanija materii // O sushhnosti zhizni. M.: Nauka.
Kremenjuk V.A. (2013). Akademik Georgij Arkad'evich Arbatov (90 let so dnja rozhdenija) // SShA – Kanada: JePK. №10. S. 3–18.
Marshev V.O. (2010) O kadrovom obespechenii modernizacii strany // Jekspert. № 36. S. 47–51.
Modernizacija jekonomiki Rossii: kardinal'noe uluchshenie investicionnogo klimata (jekonomicheskij doklad Obshherossijskoj obshhestvennoj organizacii «Delovaja Rossija») (2010) // Voprosy jekonomiki. № 10. S. 68–89.
Modernizacija, avtoritarizm i demokratija. Kratkij obzor vystuplenij uchastnikov konferencii (2010) // Mirovaja jekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnoshenija. № 11. S. 91-103.
Moral' i biznes (Stenogramma zasedanija Kruglogo stola) (2009) // Ekonomіka і prognozuvannja. №2. S.128–156.
Muntijan V.I. (2012) Jekonomike SNG byt' innovacionnoj, nravstvennoj i noosfernoj // Innovacii. №3. S. 78–81.
Nagl-Dochekal G. (2009) “Mnozhestvo form nepublichnogo rassudka?” Religioznoe raznoobrazie v liberal'nyh demokratijah // Voprosy filosofii. № 9. S.12–21.
Naumov S., Slonov M. (2009) Ot ateisticheskogo gosudarstva – k svetskomu // Svobodnaja mysl'. № 9. S. 47–60.
Nikologorskij D. (2010) Modernizacija kak jetap razvitija // Jekonomist. № 6. S. 25–32.
O nravstvennosti, patriotizme, kul'ture i beskul'tur'e (aktual'nyj razgovor na vechnye temy). Materialy “kruglogo stola” v Sankt-Peterburgskom gumanitarnom universitete profsojuzov (2009) // Voprosy filosofii. № 11.S. 3–26.
Onishhenko V.P. (2011) Modernizacija jak imperativ rozvitku Ukraїni // Ekonomika Ukraїni. №7. S. 4–13.
Petrakov N. (2010) K voprosu o modernizacii jekonomiki // Jekonomist. № 12. S. 3–6.
Petrakov N., Cvetkov V. (2013) K voprosu reorganizacii nauki i naukoemkogo sektora // Jekonomist. №10. S. 3–14.
Rjazanov V. (2013) Vremja dlja novoj industrializacii: perspektivy Rossii // Jekonomist. 2013. № 8. S.3-32.
Smirnov M. (2009) Religioznoe obrazovanie v svetskoj shkole // Svobodnaja mysl'. № 8. S. 63 – 76.
Soros Dzh. (1999) Krizis mirovogo kapitalizma. Otkrytoe obshhestvo v opasnosti. M.: INFRA-M.
Stiglic Dzh.E. (2005) Revushhie devjanostye. Semena razvala. M.: Sovremennaja jekonomika i pravo.
Surzhik L. NANU: pritjazhenie zemli (2013) // Zerkalo nedeli. Ukraina. №33. S. 1,11.
Tolstyh V.O. (2009) O morali, sovesti i sovremennom mire // Svobodnaja mysl'. № 9. S. 93–106.
Toshhenko Zh.T. (2007) Teokratija: fantom ili real'nost'? M.: Academia.
Fedotova V.G., Kolpakov V.A., Fedotova N.N. (2013) Kakaja modernizacija i kakoj kapitalizm nuzhny Rossii? // Voprosy filosofii. №10. S. 3–12.
Fedotova V.G., Kolpakov V.G., Fedotova N.N. (2011) Menjajushhajasja social'nost': budushhee kapitalizma // Voprosy filosofii. №6. S.3–15.
Fomchenkova G. (2012.) Rossija – Evropa: ugrozy duhovnoj bezopasnosti molodezhi // Sovremennaja Evropa. № 1. S. 42–52.
Formirovanie obshhestva, osnovannogo na znanijah. Novye zadachi vysshej shkoly: doklad Vsemirnogo banka (2003). Moskva: Ves' mir.
Hubiev K. (2013) Neoindustrial'naja modernizacija i al'ternativnye podhody k nej // Jekonomist. №4. – S. 27 – 32.
Cvetkov V. (2010) Ob otpravnoj tochke neoindustrial'noj modernizacii // Jekonomist. № 11. S. 16–26.
Chervjakov A., Griboedova I. (2013) Slagaemye progressa // Belaruskaja dumka. №4.
Shterenberg M.I. (2010) Krizisy i problemy vospitanija // Voprosy filosofii. №4. S.158–167.
Jengel's F. (a) Dialektika prirody // Marks K., Jengel's F. Soch., 2-e izd. T. 20. S. 339-626.
Jengel's F. (b) Materialy k “Anti-Djuringu” // Marks K., Jengel's F. Soch., 2-e izd. T. 20. S. 627-676.
JuNESKO. Vsemirnyj doklad “K obshhestvu znanij” (2005).
Economic Report of the President 2001 (2001). Washington.
Knowledge Economy II Forum “Implementing Knowledge Economy Strategies: Innovation, Life-Long Learning, Partnerschips, Networks, and Inclusion” (2003). Helsinki, March 25–28.
The New Knowledge Economy in Europe. A Strategy for Internationale Competitineveness and Social Cohesion / Ed. By M.J. Rodriges, E. Elgar (2002). Pbl.
World Development Report (1998/99): Knowledge for Development (1999). The World Bank.
№ 3/2014
1Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine
A clean moral science: about the self-justification of "fundamental" scientific knowledge in the age of global modernization
Ekon. teor. 2014; 3:0- |
ABSTRACT ▼
The article reveals the content of "fundamental" scientific knowledge as a carrier of moral reference points in the global socio-economic transformations. The author comprehends the contribution of the noosphere conception and the legacy of the classical German philosophy in the justification of the worldview principles of free scientific search. The article highlights the creative mission of economic theory as a value stronghold for the modernization of economic practice and formation of a reasonable society corresponding to harmonic institutional architectonics.
Keywords:fundamental knowledge, global transformations, economic theory, institutional architectonics
JEL: В410, В490
Article in Russian (pp. 5 - 23) | Download | Downloads :537 |
Article in Ukrainian (pp. 5 - 23) | Download | Downloads :499 |
REFERENCES ▼
Akvinskij Foma (2008) Summa teologii. Chast' II-I. Voprosy 49–89. K.: Nika-Centr.
Andreev I., Nazarova L. (2013) Psihicheskoe zdorov'e cheloveka // Svobodnaja mysl'. №5. S. 131–146.
Aristotel' (1976) Metafizika // Aristotel' Sochinenija: V 4-h tt. T.1. M.: Mysl'.
Aristotel' (1983) Nikomahova jetika // Aristotel' Sochinenija: V 4-h tt. T.4. M.: Mysl'. S. 53–293.
Artjomova T.I. (2006) Stoimost' i cena: logiko-istoricheskij process formoobrazovanija. K.: Osnova.
Artjomova T.I. (2011) Metodologicheskaja anatomija global'nogo finansovo-jekonomicheskogo krizisa // Jekonomicheskaja teorija. № 2. S. 16–33.
Bek U. (2000) Obshhestvo riska: na puti k drugomu modernu. M.: Progress-Tradicija.
Behman G. (2007) Sovremennoe obshhestvo kak obshhestvo riska // Voprosy filosofii. № 1. S. 26–46.
Gnatik E.N. (2007) Rol' cennostnogo podhoda v antropogenetike i gennoj inzhenerii // Voprosy filosofii. № 8. S. 70–78.
Gricenko A.A. (1997) Struktura rynochnoj transformacii inversionnogo tipa // Jekonomika Ukrainy № 1. S. 4–10.
Gricenko A.A. (2001) Jevoljucija stoimosti // Jekonomika Ukrainy. № 4. S. 45–55.
Gricenko A.A. (2008) (red.). Institucional'naja arhitektonika i dinamika jekonomicheskih preobrazovanij Har'kov: Fort.
Etychnyj kodeks uchenogo Ukrai'ny (2009) // Visnyk Nacional'noi' Akademii' Nauk Ukrai'ny. № 7. S. 61–68.
Kant I. (1995) (a) Osnovy metafiziki nravstvennosti // Kritika prakticheskogo razuma. SPb.: Nauka. S. 53–119.
Kant I. (1995) (b) Kritika prakticheskogo razuma // Kritika prakticheskogo razuma. SPb.: Nauka. S. 121–258.
Kiseljov G.S. (2010) Vtoraja vselennaja: drama svobody // Voprosy filosofii. № 3. S. 3–17.
Kijashhenko L.P, Mirskaja E.Z. (2008) (red.) Jetos nauki. M.: Academia.
Kotljakov V.M., Tishkov A.A. (2009) Strategija ustojchivogo razvitija: jetika geograficheskogo podhoda // Vestnik Rossijskoj Akademii Nauk. № 11. S. 963–970.
Malahov V. (2009) Etichnij kodeks uchenogo: aksіologіja і pragmatika // Vіsnik Nacіonal'noї akademії nauk Ukraїni. № 5. S. 12–19.
Mirzojan V.A. (2010) Upravlenie kak predmet filosofskogo analiza // Voprosy filosofii. № 4. S. 35–47.
Onoprijenko V. (2009) Etos nauky v epohu zmin // Visnyk Nacional'noi' Akademii' Nauk Ukrai'ny. № 6. S. 58–62.
Rovinskij R.E. (2008) Mirovozzrencheskie problemy fizicheskoj nauki, nasleduemye XXI vekom // Voprosy filosofii. № 3. S. 128–132.
Samujel'son P., Nordhaus V. (2000) Jekonomika. M.: Laboratorija Bazovyh Znanij.
Soros Dzh. (1999) Krizis mirovogo kapitalizma. Otkrytoe obshhestvo v opasnosti. M.: INFRA – M.
Shterenberg M.I. (2010) Krizisy i problemy vospitanija // Voprosy filosofii. № 4. S. 158–167.
Ewald F. (1989) Die Versicherugs-Gesellshaft // Kritische Justiz Jb.22. Heft 4. S. 385–393.
№ 4/2015
1Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine
Political economy as a value stronghold of socio-economic modernization
Ekon. teor. 2015; 4:0-0 |
ABSTRACT ▼
The article reveals the contents of fundamental scientific knowledge as a source of philosophical principles of free scientific search during the age of global socio-economic transformations. The author highlights the creative mission of economic theory as a value bulwark of the society, which is acceptable for life, in term of harmonious institutional architectonics.
Keywords:socio-economic modernization, economic theory, value relations, economic benefit, institutional archi-tectonics of economics management
JEL: А130, В410.
Article in Russian (pp. 62 - 70) | Download | Downloads :452 |
Article in Ukrainian (pp. 62 - 70) | Download | Downloads :451 |
REFERENCES ▼
Aristotel' (1983) Nikomahova jetika. Aristotel'. Sochinenija: V 4-h t. T. 4. M.: Mysl'.
Artjomova T.I. (2006) Stoimost' i cena: logiko-istoricheskij process formoobrazovanija. K.: Osnova.
Behman G. (2007) Sovremennoe obshhestvo kak obshhestvo riska. Voprosy filosofii. № 1. S. 26–46.
Vernadskij V.I. (1991) Nauchnaja mysl' kak planetnoe javlenie. M.: Nauka.
Heiets V.M. (2010) Liberalno-demokratychni zasady: kurs na modernizatsiiu Ukrainy. Ekonomika Ukrainy. № 3. S. 4–20.
Gricenko A.A. (1997) Struktura rynochnoj transformacii inversionnogo tipa. Jekonomika Ukrainy. № 1. S. 4–10.
Gricenko A.A. (2001) Jevoljucija stoimosti. Jekonomika Ukrainy. № 4. S. 45–55.
Gricenko A.A. (red.) (2008) Institucional'naja arhitektonika i dinamika jekonomicheskih preobrazovanij. Har'kov: Fort.
Kant I. (1995 a) Osnovy metafiziki nravstvennosti. Kritika prakticheskogo razuma. SPb: Nauka. S.53–119.
Kant I. (1995 b) Kritika prakticheskogo razuma. Kritika prakticheskogo razuma. – SPb: Nauka. S. 121–258.
Soros Dzh. (1999) Krizis mirovogo kapitalizma. Otkrytoe obshhestvo v opasnosti. M.: INFRA-M.
Fedotova V.G., Kolpakov V.G., Fedotova N.N. (2011) Menjajushhajasja social'nost': budushhee kapitalizma. Voprosy filosofii. № 6. S. 3–15.
№ 3/2016
1Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine
Relations of social reproduction in Ukraine in the context of transformation of the models of state management
Ekon. teor. 2016; 3:5-17 | https://doi.org/10.15407/etet2016.03.005 |
ABSTRACT ▼
Problems of modernization of the national economy and raising the people’s welfare still remain ur-gent after a quarter-century of market reforms; the successful resolution of these problems requires understanding of the world experience of transforming the general model of market economy on the verge of XX-XXI centuries. The article clarifies the meaning and patterns of global transformation of the public sector as a conceptual platform for Ukraine to attain the path of sustainable socio-economic development.
Keywords:public sector, global transformations, public property, efficient management of corporate rights.
JEL: B410:H820
Article in Russian (pp. 5 - 17) | Download | Downloads :436 |
Article in Ukrainian (pp. 5 - 17) | Download | Downloads :443 |
REFERENCES ▼
2. Artomova, T.I. (2011). Methodological anatomy of the global financial and economic crisis. Ekon. teor. – Economic theory, 2, 16-32 [in Russian].
3. Heyets, V. (2013). On the future of the welfare state. Mir peremen – The World of transformations, 4, 88-103 [in Russian].
4. Hrytsenko, A. (2011). Methodological bases modernize Ukraine. Ekonomika Ukrainy – Economy of Ukraine, 2, 4-12 [in Ukrainian].
5. Gubanov, S. (2001). Vertical integration – the main way of development. Jekonomist – The Economist, 1, 35-49 [in Russian].
6. Deljagin, M. (2015). What we do not know. Svobodnaja mysl – Free thought, 1, 37- 50 [in Russian].
7. Kibenko, E.R. (2001). Corporate law in Ukraine. Kharkiv: Jespada [in Russian].
8. Korovin, V. (2014). Third World network war. Sankt-Peterburg: Piter Press [in Russian].
9. Madzukato, M. (2015). Innovative State. Rossija v global’noj politike – Russia in global affairs, 3, 199-210 [in Russian].
10. Nykyforuk, O.I. (2014). Modernization of surface transportation systems of Ukraine. NAS of Ukraine, Institute for economics and forecasting. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
11. Nykyforuk, O.I., Chmyrova, L.Iu., Fediai, N.O. (2015). Prospects for funding transport projects in the framework of international financial assistance. Ekonomika Ukrainy – Economy of Ukraine, 4, 45- 57 [in Ukrainian].
12. Piriashvili, B.Z., Nykyforuk, O.I. (Eds.). (2014). The principles of the modernization of production infrastructure Ukraine. NAS of Ukraine, Institute for economics and forecasting. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
13. Sapir, Zh. (2015). The French economy in 2014: conjunctural crisis and structural crisis. Problemy prognozirovanija – Problems of forecasting, 2, 93-107 [in Russian].
14. Stiglitz, J. (2005). Roaring Nineties. The seeds of collapse. Moscow: Sovremennaja jekonomika i pravo [in Russian].
15. Supjan, V.B. (2002). The state’s role in the American economy: theory and practice. SShA - Kanada: jekonomika, politika, kul'tura – USA - Canada: Economics - Politics - Culture, 1, 2-17 [in Russian].
16. Supjan, V.B. (2015). The American economic model: characteristics and efficiency at the beginning of the XXI century. SShA - Kanada: jekonomika, politika, kul'tura – USA - Canada: Economics - Politics - Culture, 3-25 [in Russian].
17. Cygankov, A. (2015). Strong State: The Theory and Practice in the XXI century. Rossija v global’noj politike – Russia in Global Affairs, 3, 8-18 [in Russian].
18. Shlihter, A. (2014). Public goods in the United States: the distribution and financing. Mirovaja jekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnoshenija – World economy and international relations, 5, 42-52 [in Russian].
19. Feigenbaum, H., Henig, J., Hament, Ch. (1998). Shrinking the State: The Political Underpinning of Privatization. Cambridge. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511660016">doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511660016">https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511660016
20. Fridman, M. (1962). Capitalism, Freedom and Democracy. Chicago.
№ 4/2017
1Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine
European values: traditional concepts in the era of global market transformations
Ekon. teor. 2017; 4:5-31 | https://doi.org/10.15407/etet2017.04.005 |
ABSTRACT ▼
The article clarifies the value basis of global market transformations, and reveals the traditional concepts of the values of social life. The author updates the heuristic potential of the concept of European values as the core of civilizational interactions for the substantiation of the programs for modernization of the system of socio-economic relations and reduction of uncertainty in economic prospects.
Keywords:values of social life, civilizational interactions, global market transformations
JEL: А130
Article in Russian (pp. 5 - 31) | Download | Downloads :844 |
Article in Ukrainian (pp. 5 - 31) | Download | Downloads :568 |
REFERENCES ▼
2. An’gan, Hu. (2015). "New Normality" of China. Rossija v global’noj politike – Russia in global politics, 3, 162-169 [in Russian].
3. Artemova, T. (2014a). Pure moral science: about self-justification of "fundamental" scientific knowledge in conditions of global modernization. Ekon. teor. – Economic theory, 2, 5-20 [in Russian].
4. Artemova, T. (2014b). Pure moral science: about self-justification of "fundamental" scientific knowledge in conditions of global modernization. Ekon. teor. – Economic theor, 3, 5-23 [in Russian].
5. Artemova, T.I. (2017). Global economic leadership in the context of value analysis. Ekonomika Ukrainy – Economy of Ukraine, 5-6, 123-135 [in Russian].
6. Babichenko, K.N. (2016). War of Human Rights. Svobodnaja mysl’ – Free thought, 1, 5-18 [in Russian].
7. Berdjaev, N. (1922). The Death Thought of Faust. In Berdjaev, N.A., Bukshpan, Ja.M. et.al. Oswald Spengler and the Decline of Europe, 55-72. Moscow: Knigoizdatel’stvo "Bereg" [in Russian].
8. Czjun’zhu, L. (2017). On the main issues of Sinification of Marxism. Svobodnaja mysl’ – Free thought, 4, 65-76 [in Russian].
9. Cygankov, P.A. (Ed.). (2015). "Hybrid Wars" in the Chaotic World of the 21st Century. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo MGU [in Russian].
10. Cherkovec, V.N. (Ed.) (1994). World History of Economic Thought in 6 vol. Vol 5. Moscow: Mysl’ [in Russian].
11. Chernenko, E. (2016). The beginning of political cyberwar. Rossija v global’noj politike – Russia is a global politician, 6, 134-144 [in Russian].
12. Conflict problems in the modern world (2016). Mirovaja jekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnoshenija – World Economy and International Relations, 6, 90-101 [in Russian].
13. Deljagin, M. (2015). What we do not know. Svobodnaja mysl’ – Free thought, 1, 37-50 [in Russian].
14. Fon Mizes, L. (1994). Socialism. Economic and sociological analysis. Moscow: Catallaxy [in Russian].
15. Fukujama, F. (1990). The end of the story? Voprosy filosofii – Questions of philosophy, 3, 134-148 [in Russian].
16. Gilev, A. (2014). Multidimensional war and a new defence strategy. Rossija v global’noj politike – Russia in global politics, 5, 47-56 [in Russian].
17. Global system at the break: on the way to a new normality (2016). Mirovaja jekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnoshenija – World economy and international relations, 8, 5-25 [in Russian].
18. Grammatchikov, A., Vandysheva, O. (2017). There is a cyberwar folk. Jekspert – Expert, 5, 13-19 [in Russian].
19. Grin, R. (2016). 33 strategies of war. Moscow: Ripol Klassik [in Russian].
20. Grishin, I. (2017). Immigration Concerns in Sweden. Mirovaja jekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnoshenija – World Economy and International Relations, 9, 66-76 [in Russian].
21. Gurevich, P.S. (Ed.) (1986). A new technocratic wave in the West. Digest of articles. Moscow: Progress [in Russian].
22. Hajtun, S.D. (2011). The post-industrial moral revolution and its economic (Keynesian) basis. Voprosy filosofii – Questions of philosophy, 3, 24-35 [in Russian].
23. Hantington, S. (1994).The clash of civilizations? Polis – Police, 1, 33-48 [in Russian].
24. Hrytsenko, A.A. (1997). Structure of market transformation of inversion type. Ekonomika Ukrainy – Economy of Ukraine, 1, 4-10 [in Russian].
25. Inozemcev, V.L. (Ed.). (1999). A new post-industrial wave in the West. Anthology. Moscow: Academia [in Russian].
26. Jensen, R. (2008). Dream Society. How the coming shift from information to imagination will transform your business. Moscow: Mann, Ivanov i Ferber [in Russian].
27. Kaldor, M. (2015). New old wars: organized violence in the global era. Moscow: Delo [in Russian].
28. Kissindzher, G. (2015). World order. Moscow: "AST" [in Russian].
29. Kozin, N. (2005). Is there a future for the West? Svobodnaja mysl’ – Free thought, 4, 192-201 [in Russian].
30. Lomanov, A. (2012). Calcium for the communists. Rossija v global’noj politike – Russia in global politics, 6, 106-119 [in Russian].
31. Lomanov, A. (2015). The common denominator of the nation. Chinese values will compete with Western values. Rossija v global’noj politike – Russia in global politics, 5, 138-152 [in Russian].
32. Loss of certainty: outlines of the post-crisis world (2014). Seventh meeting of the intellectual club of the magazine "Free thought". Svobodnaja mysl’ – Free thought, 6, 133-152 [in Russian].
33. Luk’janov, F. (2017). Superpower on autopilot and wandering ghost. Rossija v global’noj politike – Russia in global politics, 2, 5-6 [in Russian].
34. Makkonnell, K.R., Brju, S.L. (1992). Economics: Principles, problems and politics. Moscow: Respublika [in Russian].
35. Mareev, S. (2010). Ideas, ideals and "values". Svobodnaja mysl’ – Free thought, 1, 173-186 [in Russian].
36. Mart’janov, V.S. (2016). Goodbye, middle class. Svobodnaja mysl’ – Free thought, 5, 53-70 [in Russian].
37. Marshall, A. (1993). Principles of economic science. Moscow: Izdatel’skaja gruppa "Progress" [in Russian].
38. Moss, M. (2015). Salt, sugar and fat: how the food giants put us on a needle. Moscow: Mann, Ivanov i Ferber [in Russian].
39. Ol’sevich, Ju.Ja. (1994). Postwar thought of the West: the key to understanding (instead of concluding). In Vsemirnaja istorija jekonomicheskoj mysli v 6-ti t. – World history of economic thought in 6-th vol, vol. 5, 508-522. Moscow: Mysl’ [in Russian].
40. Ol’sevich, Ju.Ja. (1999). The present crisis of the economic theory of marxism (chapter 31). In History of economic teachings: (modern stage), p. 687-700. Moscow: INFRA-M [in Russian].
41. Osipov, G.V. (Ed.). (1995). Encyclopedic sociological dictionary. Moscow: ISPI RAN [in Russian].
42. Pajn, Dzh., Gilmor, Dzh. (2005). Economy of impressions. Moscow: Vil’jams [in Russian].
43. Piters, T. (2006). Fundamentals. Design. Moscow: Mann, Ivanov i Ferber [in Russian].
44. Plotnikov, I.S. (Ed.). (1935). Mercantilism. Leningrad: OGIZ; Socjekgiz [in Russian].
45. Rydderstralle, Y., Nordstrem, K. (2004). Karaoke-Capitalism. Dnipropetrovsk: Balans Biznes Buks [in Ukrainian].
46. Rouz, K. (2016). The war of currency devaluations. Mir peremen – The world of change, 3, 100-109 [in Russian].
47. Samuelson, Paul A., Nordhaus, William D. (2000). Economics. Moscow: Laboratorija Bazovyh Znanij [in Russian].
48. Semenov, A. (1998). New rules for a new economy. Digest of Kevin Kelly’s article in the magazine "Wired". Znanie – sila – Knowledge is power, 4, 20-29 [in Russian].
49. Si, Chen’, Sypin’, Aj, Lasu, Caj (2013). The path of national revival and Sinification of Marxism. Pekin: Pekinskaja kompanija "Shans"; Sankt-Peterburg: Buki Vedi [in Russian].
50. Slivotski, A. (2006). Migration of value. What will happen to your business the day after tomorrow? Moscow: Mann, Ivanov i Ferber [in Russian].
51. Solov’ev, Je. (2016). The revival of history and the problem of the formation of a new world order. Mirovaja jekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnoshenija – World economy and international relations, 5, 102-108 [in Russian].
52. Soros, Dzh. (1999). The crisis of world capitalism. Open society at risk. Moscow: INFRA-M [in Russian].
53. Surikov, V. (2015). The battlefield is the screen. Jekspert – Expert, 18-19, 60-61 [in Russian].
54. Turou, L. (1999). The future of capitalism. How the economy of today forms the world of tomorrow. Anthology. Moscow: Academi [in Russian].
55. Shevchenko, V.N. (2017). The tragedy of perestroika from the point of view of Chinese scientists. Svobodnaja mysl’ – Free thought, 4, 191-196 [in Russian].
56. Shen’min, L. (2017). The October Revolution is like an art canvas. Svobodnaja mysl’ – Free thought, 4, 9-20 [in Russian].
57. Shmitt, B., Rodzhers, D., Vrocos, K. (2005). Business in the style of the show. Marketing in the culture of impressions. Moscow: Vil’jams [in Russian].
58. Vjejpin, S. (2017). Marxist philosophy in modern China. Svobodnaja mysl’ – Free thought, 4, 131-160 [in Russian].
59. Zagorskij, A.V., Romashkina, N.P. (Eds.). (2015). Threats to Information Security in Crises and Conflicts of the 21st Century. Moscow: IMJeMO RAN [in Russian].
60. Ivanov, I. (2012). Anatomy of European values. Sovremennaja Evropa – Modern Europe, 2, 13-23 [in Russian].
№ 3/2018
1Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine
European values: the intellectual property of the civilizational dialogue
Ekon. teor. 2018; 3:5-28 | https://doi.org/10.15407/etet2018.03.005 |
ABSTRACT ▼
It is revealed that European culture has been historically oriented to humanity. The results of high philosophical studies, pioneering achievements of science, masterpieces of art and literature, technological innovations of the European class invariably became the property of all mankind. For the countries and peoples of the post-Soviet space, European cultural values are of particular importance. But in the era of global market oriented transformations, the traditional concepts of the European cultural heritage need to be reconsidered.
The author shows that, in the general civilization heritage, the scientific knowledge accumulated by the society is of remarkable value. The importance of fundamental scientific knowledge as a public good was understood in antiquity. The phenomenon of historical dialogue between representatives of the best minds of antiquity and the Middle Ages laid the foundation for the formation of classical European philosophy and science of modern times. It is from the precious intellectual alloy of "Christian Aristotelianism", that those civil society institutions that until now constitute the subject of pride of European nations and models for imitation throughout the world were forged. At the same time, however, the basis for a new understanding of the laws and arrangement of public life involves the historically formed contradictions and paradoxes of fundamental scientific knowledge.
It was discovered that post-Soviet countries have been mastering the fruits of the European civilizational heritage jointly and gradually. In the course of the market oriented transformation of the economy, the problem of the formation of effective development institutions is critical for the normal adaptation of these countries to global challenges. However, the civilizational experiences should be borrowed in a prudent manner. The process should be based on adequate methodological foundations, and take into account the overall inversive character of the development of the intellectual sphere and economic life in general.
Keywords: historical cultural heritage, fundamental scientific knowledge as a public good, inversion character of global social transformations, intellectual dialogue, European civilizational values
JEL: A 130
Article in Russian (pp. 5 - 28) | Download | Downloads :612 |
Article in Ukrainian (pp. 5 - 28) | Download | Downloads :524 |
REFERENCES ▼
2. Aristotle (1983a). Nicomache’s ethics. Aristotle. Works: in 4 tons. T. 4. Moscow: Mysl, 53-294 [in Russian].
3. Aristotle. (1976). Metaphysics. Aristotle. Works: in 4 tons. T. 1. Moscow: Mysl, 63-368 [in Russian].
4. Aristotle. (1983b). Great ethics. Aristotle. Works: in 4 tons. T. 4. Moscow: Mysl, 295-374 [in Russian].
5. Aristotle. Politics (1983). Aristotle. Works: in 4 tons. T. 4. Moscow: Mysl, 375-642 [in Russian].
6. Artomova, T.I. (2011). Methodological anatomy of the global financial and economic crisis. Ekon. teor. – Economic theory, 2, 16-33 [in Ukrainian].
7. Artomova, T.I. (2017). European values: traditional concepts in the era of global market transformations. Ekon. teor. – Economic theory, 4, 5-31 [in Ukrainian].
8. Artemyeva, T.V. (2009). Russia’s entry into the intellectual space of Europe: from Peter I to Catherine II. Voprosy filosofii – Philosophy issues, 9, 41-55 [in Russian].
9. Artomova, T.I. (2016). The inverse character of social market transformations. Ukrainskyi sotsium – Ukrainian society, 4, 69-77 [in Ukrainian].
10. Asmus, V. (1976). Metaphysics of Aristotle. Aristotle. Works: in 4 tons. T. 1. Moscow: Mysl, 5-50 [in Russian].
11. Berdyaev, N.A. (1990). The meaning of the story. Moscow: Thought. (Copyright YMCA-PRESS, Paris, 1969) [in Russian].
12. Most people do not realize what is happening (2018). The speech of the Israeli historian Yuval Noah Harari in Davos 01/29/2018. Retrieved from: bykvu.com/bukvy/84181-bolshinstvo-lyudej-ne-osoznayut-chto-proiskhodit-rech-izrailskogo-istorika-v-davose/ Appeal date: 10. 02. 2018 [in Russian].
13. Gaidenko, P. (2009). To the problem of the formation of modern European science. Voprosy filosofii – Philosophy issues, 5, 80-92 [in Russian].
14. Heyets, V.M., et al. (ed.) (2015). Innovative Ukraine 2020: National Report. Kyiv: NAN Ukrainy [in Ukrainian].
15. Hrytsenko, A.A. (ed.) (2008). Institutional economics and dynamics of economic transformations. Kharkiv: Fort [in Russian].
16. Hrytsenko, A.A. (1997). The structure of the market transformation of the inversion type. Ekonomika Ukrainy – Economy of Ukraine, 1, 4-10 [in Russian].
17. Dergachev V. (2018). European experience of regional politics. Mir peremen – The world of change, 1, 157-171 [in Russian].
18. Dynkin, A., Barrows, M. (ed.) (2016). The global system at the turn: the path to a new normality. Scientific report on the results of a joint study of the IMEMO RAS and the Atlantic Council. Moscow: IMEMO RAN [in Russian].
19. Inozemtsev, V.L. (1998). Outside the economic society. Moscow: Akademia; The science [in Russian].
20. Kiseleva, M.S., Chumakova, T.V. (2009). Russia’s entry into the intellectual space of Europe: between the Kingdom and the Empire. Voprosy filosofii – Philosophy issues, 9, 22-40 [in Russian].
21. Kindzersky, Yu. (2018). Institutional traps and preconditions for effective neo-industrial transformations in Ukraine. Socio-Humanities and Modern Challenges: Materials of the Third All-Ukrainian Scientific Conference (Dnipro, May 25-26, 2018). Part II Dnipro: SPD Okhotnik, 290-292 [in Ukrainian].
22. Kuzminov, J., Radaev, V. et al. (2005). Institutions: from borrowing to growing. Voprosy jekonomiki – Economic Issues, 5, 5-27 [in Russian].
23. Marshall, A. (1993). Principles of economic science: in 3 tons. Moscow: Izdatelskaja gruppa Progress [in Russian].
24. Mechanic, A. (2018). Victory and defeat neoliberalism. Jekspert – Expert, 27, 66-67 [in Russian]
25. Meadows, Donella, Meadows, Dennis, Randers, Jorgen (1999). Beyond the acceptable: global catastrophe or stable future? New post-industrial wave in the West: an anthology. Moscow: Academia, 572-595 [in Russian].
26. Milanovic, B. (2017). Global inequality. A new approach for the era of globalization. Moscow: Gaidar Institute Publishing [in Russian].
27. Neklessa, A. (1998). Epilogue stories. Vostok – East, 5, 5-30 [in Russian].
28. New inequalities – new conflicts: ways to overcome (2017). Abstracts of speeches and speeches of participants of the III Congress of the Sociological Association of Ukraine (Kharkiv, October 12-13, 2017). Kharkiv: Sotsiolohichna asotsiatsiia Ukrainy, Kharkivskyi natsionalnyi universytet imeni V.N. Karazina [in Ukrainian].
29. Podlesnaja, V.G. (2017). Logico-historical foundations of formation of socio-economic cycles. Kyiv: Institut jekonomiki i prognozirovanija NAN Ukrainy [in Russian].
30. Polterovich, V.M. (1999). Institutional traps and economic reforms. Jekonomika i matematicheskie metody – Economics and Mathematical Methods, 35: 2, 1-37 [in Russian].
31. Soros, J. (1999). The crisis of world capitalism. An open society is in danger. Moscow: INFRA-M, VI [in Russian].
32. Stiglitz, J. (2005). Roaring ninety. Seeds collapse. Moscow: Sovremennaja jekonomika i pravo [in Russian].
33. Tarasevich, V.N. (2017). The quarter of the century of independence of Ukraine: actual contexts and imperatives of socio-economic reforms. Ekonomika Ukrainy – Economy of Ukraine, 7, 3-21 [in Russian].
34. The loss of certainty: outlines of the post-crisis world (2014). Seventh meeting of the intellectual club of the magazine Free thought. Svobodnaja mysl – Free Thought, 6, 133-152 [in Russian].
35. Fukuyama, F. (1990). End of story? Voprosy filosofii – Philosophy issues, 3, 134-148 [in Russian].
36. Handy, C. (1999). Alchemist spirit. Beyond the Capitalism: Finding a Goal in the Modern World. New Post-Industrial Wave in the West: Anthology. Moscow: Academia, 163-184 [in Russian].
37. Weizsaecker, E., Wijkman, A. (2018). Come On! Capitalism, Short-termism, Population and the Destruction of the Planet. Springer.
№ 1/2019
1Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine
Search for models of effective management of national economy under conditions of social challenges (Review on monograph Anti-crisis management of the national economy)
Ekon. teor. 2019; 1:113-115 |
ABSTRACT ▼
Keywords:
JEL:
Article in Russian (pp. 113 - 115) | Download | Downloads :424 |
Article in Ukrainian (pp. 113 - 115) | Download | Downloads :434 |
REFERENCES ▼
№ 4/2019
1Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine
European values: a liberal doctrine through the methodology of political economy
Ekon. teor. 2019; 4:5-28 |
ABSTRACT ▼
Clarification of the laws of harmonious ordering of the social economy system was largely carried out in the depth of European civilization in the course of the evolution of fundamental scientific knowledge. Thus, the synergy of intellectual efforts of the representatives of classical German philosophy, English political economy and French social doctrines became a catalyst and, at the same time, a fertile cultural ground for the establishment of civic institutions of modern times.
Transcendent understanding of civilizational values as a system of social relations is to be carried out by political economy – the science of economic laws. Such a mission of economic science was defined during the formation of its classic research line as the logic of the Middle Way. However, modern economic theory in content remains traditional. It does not conceive its object in a single space-time coordinate system or recognize the economic value (economic good) as its own object and the basis of social relations. For that reason, the most important concepts of civilizational herit-age are considerably distorted.
Freedom, equality, and brotherhood, which are considered to be political in origin, are the most important universal values that have been promulgated by the European community in modern times. However, the crystallization of the values of freedom, equality, and brotherhood in their syncretic unity is initially carried out in the depths of political economy. In recent times, each of them has been taken as one of the traditional methodological branches of economic science. Thus, the problem of freedom is key to the liberal-margin economic doctrine that today ideologically feeds educational courses in economics. In order to modernize the training courses, experts propose to restore their connection with the provisions of the authentic doctrine of liberal marginalization, and with the conceptual system of L. von Mises. This rethinking makes the logic of functioning of the modern market economy and the basic principles of neoliberal policy more transparent and at the same time shows the imperfection of liberal doctrine in comparison with the original scientific provi-sions of classical economic thought.
Keywords:harmonious ordering of the economic system, methodology of political economy, liberal ideology, freedom of economic choice, European civilizational values
JEL: A130
REFERENCES ▼
2. Artomova, T. (2011). Methodological anatomy of the global financial and economic crisis. Ekon. teor. – Economic theory, 2, 16-33 [In Ukrainian].
3. Artomova, T. (2006). Cost and price: the logical-historical process of shaping. Kiev: Osnova [In Russian].
4. Acemoglu, D., Robinson, J. (2013). Politics or economics? Traps standard solutions. Vo-prosy jekonomiki – Economic issues, 12, 4-28 [In Russian].
5. Bakunin, M.A. (1990). Corruption. – About Machiavelli. – The development of statehood (preface to the publication of N.M. Pirumova). Voprosy jekonomiki – Economic issues, 12, 53-66 [In Russian].
6. Hrytsenko. A. The structure of the market transformation of the inversion type. Jekonomika Ukrainy – Economy of Ukraine, 1, 4-10 [In Russian].
7. Galbraith, J. (1979). Economic theories and goals of society. Moscow: Progress [In Rus-sian].
8. Jacobs, G. (2018). The political economy of neoliberalism and illiberal democracy. Mir peremen. – World of change, 3, 26-36 [In Russian].
9. Joseph, S. Nye, Jr. (2017). Will the liberal world order survive? Rossija v globalnoj politike – Russia in Global Affairs, 2, 72-82 [In Russian].
10. The law of reproduction of inequality is established. Editorial Article (2017). Jekspert. – Expert, 38, 13 [In Russian].
11. Kapeljushnikov, R.I. (2019a). Contra paninstitutionalism. Part I. Voprosy jekonomiki – Eco-nomic issues, 7, 119-146 [In Russian].
12. Kapeljushnikov, R.I. (2019б). Contra paninstitutionalism. Part II. Voprosy jekonomiki – Economic issues, 8, 98-126 [In Russian].
13. Chiesa, G. (2018). Go beyond the limits of the \\\"cash card\\\". Reading Gramsci today. Scat-tered notes on intellectuals and cultural organizations. Svobodnaja mysl. – Free thought, 6, 17-32 [In Russian].
14. McConnell, C.R., Brju, S.L. (1992). Economics: Principles, problems and politics: in 2 vol-umes. Moscow: Respublika [In Russian].
15. Macron, E. (2019). \\\"Capitalism has degraded and gone crazy\\\". Retrieved from www.ridus.ru/news/306110 [In Russian].
16. Marshall, A. (1993). Principles of economic science: in 3 vol. Moscow: Izdatelskaja gruppa \\\"Progress\\\" [In Russian].
17. Mises, L. von (1993). Bureaucracy. Planned chaos. Anti-capitalist mentality. Moscow: Delo [In Russian].
18. Mises, L. von (1994). Socialism. Economic and sociological analysis. Moscow: \\\"Catallaxy\\\" [In Russian].
19. Mises, L. von (2000). Human Activities: A Treatise on Economic Theory. Moscow: OAO \\\"NPO \\\"Jekonomika\\\"\\\" [In Russian].
20. Milanovic, B. (2014). Global inequality. A new approach for the era of globalization. Mos-cow: Izd-vo Instituta Gajdara [In Russian].
21. Niblett, R. (2018). The retreat of liberalism. Rossija v globalnoj politike – Russia in Global Affairs, 2, 83-93 [In Russian].
22. New Inequalities - New Conflicts: Ways to Overcome (2017). Abstracts and speeches of the participants of the 3rd Congress of the Sociological Association of Ukraine (Kharkiv, October 12-13, 2017). Kharkiv: Sociological Association of Ukraine, VN Kharkiv National University Karazin [In Ukrainian].
23. Nuti, D.M. (2018). The rise, fall and future of socialism. Mir peremen. – World of change, 41-55 [In Russian].
24. Piketti, T. (2015). Capital in the 21st century. Moscow: AD Marginem Press [In Ukrainian].
25. Sachs, J. (2012). The price of civilization. Moscow: Izdatelstvo Instituta Gajdara [In Russian].
26. Samuelson, P.A., Nordhaus V.D. (2000). Economy. Moscow: Laboratorija Bazovyh Znanij [In Russian].
27. Huerta, de Soto J. (2010). \\\"Human activity\\\" by Ludwig von Mises as a textbook on economic theory. Voprosy jekonomiki – Economic issues, 11, 62-82 doi: doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2010-11-62-82 [In Russian].
28. Fukuyama, F. (2019). Socialism must return. Mir peremen. – World of change, 1, 8-10 [In Russian].
1Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine
European values: a liberal doctrine through the methodology of political economy
Ekon. teor. 2019; 4:5-28 | https://doi.org/10.15407/etet2019.04.005 |
ABSTRACT ▼
Clarification of the laws of harmonious ordering of the social economy system was largely carried out in the depth of European civilization in the course of the evolution of fundamental scientific knowledge. Thus, the synergy of intellectual efforts of the representatives of classical German philosophy, English political economy and French social doctrines became a catalyst and, at the same time, a fertile cultural ground for the establishment of civic institutions of modern times.
Transcendent understanding of civilizational values as a system of social relations is to be carried out by political economy – the science of economic laws. Such a mission of economic science was defined during the formation of its classic research line as the logic of the Middle Way. However, modern economic theory in content remains traditional. It does not conceive its object in a single space-time coordinate system or recognize the economic value (economic good) as its own object and the basis of social relations. For that reason, the most important concepts of civilizational heritage are considerably distorted.
Freedom, equality, and brotherhood, which are considered to be political in origin, are the most important universal values that have been promulgated by the European community in modern times. However, the crystallization of the values of freedom, equality, and brotherhood in their syncretic unity is initially carried out in the depths of political economy. In recent times, each of them has been taken as one of the traditional methodological branches of economic science. Thus, the problem of freedom is key to the liberal-margin economic doctrine that today ideologically feeds educational courses in economics. In order to modernize the training courses, experts propose to restore their connection with the provisions of the authentic doctrine of liberal marginalization, and with the conceptual system of L. von Mises. This rethinking makes the logic of functioning of the modern market economy and the basic principles of neoliberal policy more transparent and at the same time shows the imperfection of liberal doctrine in comparison with the original scientific provisions of classical economic thought.
Keywords: harmonious ordering of the economic system, methodology of political economy, liberal ideology, freedom of economic choice, European civilizational values
JEL: A130
Article in Russian (pp. 5 - 28) | Download | Downloads :548 |
Article in Ukrainian (pp. 5 - 28) | Download | Downloads :454 |
REFERENCES ▼
2. Artomova, T. (2011). Methodological anatomy of the global financial and economic crisis. Ekon. teor. – Economic theory, 2, 16-33 [In Ukrainian].
3. Artomova, T. (2006). Cost and price: the logical-historical process of shaping. Kiev: Osnova [In Russian].
4. Acemoglu, D., Robinson, J. (2013). Politics or economics? Traps standard solutions. Voprosy jekonomiki – Economic issues, 12, 4-28 [In Russian].
5. Bakunin, M.A. (1990). Corruption. – About Machiavelli. – The development of statehood (preface to the publication of N.M. Pirumova). Voprosy jekonomiki – Economic issues, 12, 53-66 [In Russian].
6. Hrytsenko. A. The structure of the market transformation of the inversion type. Jekonomika Ukrainy – Economy of Ukraine, 1, 4-10 [In Russian].
7. Galbraith, J. (1979). Economic theories and goals of society. Moscow: Progress [In Russian].
8. Jacobs, G. (2018). The political economy of neoliberalism and illiberal democracy. Mir peremen. – World of change, 3, 26-36 [In Russian].
9. Joseph, S. Nye, Jr. (2017). Will the liberal world order survive? Rossija v globalnoj politike – Russia in Global Affairs, 2, 72-82 [In Russian].
10. The law of reproduction of inequality is established. Editorial Article (2017). Jekspert. – Expert, 38, 13 [In Russian].
11. Kapeljushnikov, R.I. (2019a). Contra paninstitutionalism. Part I. Voprosy jekonomiki – Economic issues, 7, 119-146 [In Russian].
12. Kapeljushnikov, R.I. (2019б). Contra paninstitutionalism. Part II. Voprosy jekonomiki – Economic issues, 8, 98-126 [In Russian].
13. Chiesa, G. (2018). Go beyond the limits of the "cash card". Reading Gramsci today. Scattered notes on intellectuals and cultural organizations. Svobodnaja mysl. – Free thought, 6, 17-32 [In Russian].
14. McConnell, C.R., Brju, S.L. (1992). Economics: Principles, problems and politics: in 2 volumes. Moscow: Respublika [In Russian].
15. Macron, E. (2019). "Capitalism has degraded and gone crazy". Retrieved from www.ridus.ru/news/306110 [In Russian].
16. Marshall, A. (1993). Principles of economic science: in 3 vol. Moscow: Izdatelskaja gruppa "Progress" [In Russian].
17. Mises, L. von (1993). Bureaucracy. Planned chaos. Anti-capitalist mentality. Moscow: Delo [In Russian].
18. Mises, L. von (1994). Socialism. Economic and sociological analysis. Moscow: "Catallaxy" [In Russian].
19. Mises, L. von (2000). Human Activities: A Treatise on Economic Theory. Moscow: OAO "NPO "Jekonomika"" [In Russian].
20. Milanovic, B. (2014). Global inequality. A new approach for the era of globalization. Moscow: Izd-vo Instituta Gajdara [In Russian].
21. Niblett, R. (2018). The retreat of liberalism. Rossija v globalnoj politike – Russia in Global Affairs, 2, 83-93 [In Russian].
22. New Inequalities - New Conflicts: Ways to Overcome (2017). Abstracts and speeches of the participants of the 3rd Congress of the Sociological Association of Ukraine (Kharkiv, October 12-13, 2017). Kharkiv: Sociological Association of Ukraine, VN Kharkiv National University Karazin [In Ukrainian].
23. Nuti, D.M. (2018). The rise, fall and future of socialism. Mir peremen. – World of change, 41-55 [In Russian].
24. Piketti, T. (2015). Capital in the 21st century. Moscow: AD Marginem Press [In Ukrainian].
25. Sachs, J. (2012). The price of civilization. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo Instituta Gajdara [In Russian].
26. Samuelson, P.A., Nordhaus V.D. (2000). Economy. Moscow: Laboratorija Bazovyh Znanij [In Russian].
27. Huerta, de Soto J. (2010). "Human activity" by Ludwig von Mises as a textbook on economic theory. Voprosy jekonomiki – Economic issues, 11, 62-82. doi: https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2010-11-62-82">doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2010-11-62-82">https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2010-11-62-82 [In Russian].
28. Fukuyama, F. (2019). Socialism must return. Mir peremen. – World of change, 1, 8-10 [In Russian].
№ 1/2020
1Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine
European values: a liberal doctrine through the methodology of political economy
Ekon. teor. 2020; 1:5-28 |
ABSTRACT ▼
Кількісну теорію грошей суттєво допрацював І. Фішер, висунувши рівняння обміну: MV=PQ
Keywords:Кількісну теорію грошей суттєво допрацював І. Фішер, висунувши рівняння обміну: MV=PQ
JEL: В140
REFERENCES ▼
№ 3/2022
1Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine
Theory of value as an asset of economic science: the origins of political economy in the broadest sense
Ekon. teor. 2022; 3:29-44 | https://doi.org/10.15407/etet2022.03.029 |
ABSTRACT ▼
The emergence of a new reality as Information Society and Network Economics has marked the beginning of global market transformations. Such transformations are conditioned by the latest technological advances and innovations in the sphere of information and communication but at their core, they involve the need for creative thinking about the new socio-economic picture of the world. An adequate response to the vital social demand is the formation of a relativistic economic theory. The logic of the Middle Way, as a classical institutional direction, is called upon today to form political econo-my in a broad sense through the economic value theory.
The ideas about the subject and method of political economy in the in the broad sense as the theory of socio-economic relativity were substantiation updated in the works of K. Marx and F. Engels. However, the methodological foundations of positive relativism had been originally laid down in the science of economic and crystallized in the depths of its classical current. In the light of the classical value approach, the theories of Marxism and Neoclassical synthesis claiming to be the main ideological theories, were turned out to be marginal.
The evolution of politic-economic orders of social life is value-conditioned. Its scientific comprehension as a historical process of the formation of value and price, deployment of a value genetic code (institutional constitution), that is, the architectonics of an economic system, is the lot of political economy in a broad sense. Accordingly, positively relativistic political economy in the narrow sense reflects the completeness of the value comprehension of the mission of public choice at each of the basic stages in the pro-cess of historical deployment of the being of institutional architectonics.
Aristotelian creative insights associated with the recognition of the triple nature of eco-nomic value, the institutional architectonics of management, designed to shape the benchmarks for a virtuous social life, represent the core of genuine European values. Consistent value based analysis necessarily leads economic science to clarify the essence and laws of economic harmony, which is the equilibrium functioning and sustainable development of economic systems.
Keywords:global market transformations, economics of the new reality, world social order, methodology of economic science, theory of economic value, economic good, relativ-istic political economy in a broad and narrow sense, sustainable development, European
JEL: A130
Article in Russian (pp. 29 - 44) | Download | Downloads :192 |
Article in Ukrainian (pp. 29 - 44) | Download | Downloads :159 |
REFERENCES ▼
2. Aristotle (1983). Nicomachean ethics. Aristotle. Works: in 4 vols. Vol. 4. Moscow: Mysl [in Russian].
3. Artomova, T. (2017). European values: traditional concepts in the era of global market transformations. Ekon. teor. – Economic theory, 4: 5-31. doi.org/10.15407/etet2017.04.005 [in Ukrainian].
4. Artomova, T. I. (2018). European Values: Intellectual Space of Civilizational Dialogue. Ekon. teor. – Economic theory, 3: 5-28. doi.org/10.15407/etet2018.03.005 [in Ukrainian].
5. Artomova, T. I. (2013). The logic of the Middle Way as the foundation of relativistic economics. In: Political Economy: Social Priorities: Proceedings of the First International Political Economy Congress: in 2 volumes. Vol. 2: National Economies in the Global World: Political Economy and Economic Policy. Moscow: LENAND [in Russian].
6. Artomova, T. I. (2006). Cost and price: the logical-historical process of shaping. Kyiv: Osnova [in Russian].
7. Artomova, T. I. (2014a). Pure moral science: about the self-justification of "fundamental" scientific knowledge in the context of global modernization. Ekon. teor. – Economic theory, 2: 5-20 [in Ukrainian].
8. Artomova, T. I. (2014b). Pure moral science: about the self-justification of "fundamental" scientific knowledge in the context of global modernization. Ekon. teor. – Economic theory, 2: 5-23 [in Ukrainian].
9. Bagaturia, G. A., Vygodsky, V. S. (1976) Economic legacy of Karl Marx (history, content, methodology). Moscow: Mysl [in Russian].
10. Gaidenko, P. P. (2009). To the problem of the formation of modern European science. Voprosy Filosofii – Questions of Philosophy, 5: 80-92 [in Russian].
11. Grytsenko, A. A. (1997). Structure of market transformation of inversion type. Ekon. Ukr. – Economy of Ukraine, 1: 4-10 [in Russian].
12. Inozemtsev, V. L. (1998). Outside the economic society. Moscow: Academia; Nauka [in Russian].
13. Grytsenko, A. A. (ed.) (2008). Institutional architectonics and dynamics of economic transformations. Kharkiv: Fort [in Russian].
14. Trifonova, D. K., Shirokorad, L. D. (eds.) (1983). History of the political economy of socialism. Leningrad: Leningrad University Press [in Russian].
15. Yates, F. A. (2000). Giordano Bruno and the Hermetic Tradition: transl. from English. G. Dashevsky. Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie [in Russian].
16. Castells, M. (1999). Formation of a society of network structures. In: New post-industrial wave in the West: an anthology. Moscow: Academia [in Russian].
17. Marx K. (1968). Economic Manuscripts 1857–1859. In: Marx K., Engels F. Works. 2nd ed. T. 46, part 1 [in Russian].
18. Marx K. (1960). Capital: in 4 volumes. T. 1. In: Marx K., Engels F. Works. 2nd ed. T. 23 [in Russian].
19. Marx K. (1962). Capital: in 4 vols. T. 3. In the book: Marx K., Engels F. Works,2nd ed. T. 25, part II [in Russian].
20. Marx, K. (1964). Ludwig Kugelmann – in Hannover. London, July 11, 1868. In: K. Marx, F. Engels. Works. 2nd ed. T. 33.
21. Marx, K. (1963). Letter to Engels in Manchester, June 27, 1867. In: Marx K., Engels F. Works. 2nd ed. T. 31 [in Russian].
22. Marcuse, G. (2002). Eros and civilization. One dimensional person. A study of the ideology of a developed industrial society: per. from English. A. A. Yudina. Moscow: AST Publishing House LLC [in Russian].
23. Neklessa, A. I. (2015). Heart of Darkness. Svobodnaja mysl – Free thought, 3: 119-138 [in Russian].
24. Neklessa, A. I. (1998). Epilogue of the story. Vostok – East, 5: 5-30 [in Russian].
25. Pine, II B. J., Gilmore, J. H. (2020). Economy of impressions. How to turn a purchase into an exciting action. Moscow: Alpina Pablisher [in Russian].
26. Polanyi, K. (2004). Aristotle discovers economics. Origins. Economy in the context of history and culture (p. 5-51). Moscow: GU-VShJe [in Russian].
27. Stiglitz, J. E. (2005). Roaring nineties. Seeds of collapse. Moscow: Modern Economics and Law [in Russian].
28. Tarasevich, V. N. (2014). Economic-universe knowledge and political economy in a broad sense. Political economy: past, present, future. Kyiv: TsUL [in Russian].
29. Toffler, E. (2002). Shock of the future. Moscow: OOO "Izdatelstvo AST" [in Russian].
30. Chernyshev, V. R. (1924). The life and work of David Ricardo. In: Ricardo D. Principles of political economy. Leningrad: Rabochee Izdatelstvo "Priboj" [in Russian].
31. Engels F. (1961). Anti-Dühring. In Marx K., Engels F. Works. 2nd ed. T. 20 [in Russian].
32. Global Trends 2025: A Transformed World (November 2008). US Government Printing Office. Retrieved 20.07.2022 from www.astrid-online.it/static/upload/protected/Glob/Global-Trends-2025.pdf
33. Global Trends 2030: Alternative Worlds. a publication of the National Intelligence Council (December 2012). Retrieved 20.07.2022 from www.dni.gov/files/documents/GlobalTrends_2030.pdf
34. Mapping the Global Future. Report of the National Intelligence Council’s. 2020 Project. Based on consultations with nongovernmental experts around the world (December 2004). Retrieved 20.07.2022 from www.dni.gov/files/documents/Global%20Trends_Mapping%20the%20Global%20Future%202020%20Project.pdf
35. World Bank Group. 2017. World Development Report 2017: Governance and the Law. Washington, DC: World Bank. Retrieved 20.07.2022 from openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/25880
№ 4/2022
1Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine
The theory of value as an acquisition of economic science: restoration of the foundations of social harmony
Ekon. teor. 2022; 4:30-52 | https://doi.org/10.15407/etet2022.04.030 |
ABSTRACT ▼
The formation of the information society and the network based economy has marked the beginning of global market transformations, which in their deep essence are associated with the need for a creative understanding of the new socio-economic picture of the world. An adequate response to the vital social demand is the formation of a rela-tivistic economic theory. The logic of the Middle Way as a classical institutional channel is today called to create political economy in a broad sense with the help of the theory of economic value.
Since the time of Adam Smith, when economic science recognized value relations as its own subject, and until now, the theoretical stream of the classical school has preserved internal harmony and is now able to produce signals of balanced functioning and sustainable development for economic entities. The basis for this is its value based origins in the triple unity of transformed economic forms of marginal utility, value and price. Such a concept is able, on the one hand, to most fully reflect the economic picture of the world with the help of the value based unity of economic history, and on the other hand, to creatively transform it.
The triple nature of economic value as an ideal platform for the institutional architecture of management designed to formulate the guidelines of virtuous social life, constitutes the core of true European values. However, the concept of European values has not yet been properly understood in the coordinate system of fundamental scientific knowledge, and the key concept of economic value as an economic good has not yet acquired proper scientific interpretation and consistent deployment. The ideological detachment of the official concepts of modern economic thought from the institutional core of European values determines the tendency of their methodological degradation.
Meanwhile, the value based methodology has not exhausted its potential. Continuity with the legacy of classical political economy determines the most important creative breakthroughs in economic theory during the 20th century. In the bowels of the Middle Way logic based on the concept of a standard product by P. Sraffa, the outlines of a new model of economic equilibrium in the economic system were formed in the pro-cess of its informational and technological modification. However, traditional economic science does not recognize the actual meaning of such a concept. Under the conditions of value disorientation against the background of politicized economic relations and dysfunction of social institutions, the struggle for the transformation of the world order model acquires the characteristics of a war against humanity. But it is not the "hard" power and manipulation of technologies, but rather effective mastery of social values, and the restoration of their beneficial creative potential, that is the key to success in the struggle.
Keywords:global market transformations, economy of the new reality, world social order, meth-odology of economic science, theory of value, economic good, relativistic political economy in the broad and narrow sense, sustainable development, European values
JEL: A130
Article in Russian (pp. 30 - 52) | Download | Downloads :180 |
Article in Ukrainian (pp. 30 - 52) | Download | Downloads :193 |
REFERENCES ▼
2. Ananin O. I. (2001a). The world of economy in the minds of pre-capitalist eras. In: History of Economic Doctrines. Moscow: INFRA-M [in Russian].
3. Ananin O. I. (2001б). Crystallization of scientific knowledge: XVI-XVIII centuries. In: History of Economic Doctrines. Moscow: INFRA-M [in Russian].
4. Anikin A. V. (1985). Youth of science. Life and ideas of thinkers-economists be-fore Marx. Moscow: Politizdat [in Russian].
5. Artomova, T. (2019). European values: a liberal doctrine through the methodol-ogy of political economy. Ekon. teor. – Economic theory, 4: 5-28. DOI: 10.15407/etet2019.04.005 [in Ukrainian].
6. Artomova, T. (2017). European values: traditional concepts in the era of global market transformations. Ekon. teor. – Economic theory, 4: 5-31 DOI: doi.org/10.15407/etet2017.04.005 [in Ukrainian].
7. Artomova, T. (2018). European Values: the intellectual Space of the civiliza-tional Dialogue. Ekon. teor. – Economic theory, 3: 5-28. DOI: doi.org/10.15407/etet2018.03.005 [in Ukrainian].
8. Artomova, T. (2006). Cost and price: the logical-historical process of shaping. Kiev: Osnova [in Russian].
9. Artomova, T. (2007). Economic Value Measure Institute. Ekon. teor. – Economic theory, 3: 35-56 [in Ukrainian].
10. Artomova, T. (2022). Theory of Value as an Asset of Economic Science: the origins of Political Economy in the Broadest Sense. Ekon. teor. – Economic theory, 3, 29-44. DOI: doi.org/10.15407/etet2022.03.029 [in Ukrainian].
11. Artomova, T. (2011). Methodological anatomy of the global financial and economic crisis. Ekon. teor. – Economic theory, 2: 16-33 [in Ukrainian].
12. Barabanov O., Maslova E. (2019). The concept of "global commons" as a fac-tor of global instability. Mirovaja economika i mezdunarodnye otnosheniya – World Economy and International Relations, 63(8): 53-63. DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2019-63-8-55-63 [in Russian].
13. Bulgakov, S. N. (1990). Philosophy of economy. Moscow: Nauka, Institute of Sociology of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR. [in Russian].
14. Heyets, V. M. (2022). Social reality in the digital space. Ekon Ukr. – Economy of Ukraine, 1: 3-28. DOI: doi.org/10.15407/economyukr.2022.01.003 [in Ukraini-an].
15. Grytsenko, A. A. (2003). About institutional architecture as a new scientific di-rection. Ekon. prognozuvannâ – Economics and forecasting, 2: 127-147 [in Ukrainian].
16. Grytsenko, A. A. (ed.) (2013). Hierarchy and networks in the institutional archi-tectonics of economic systems. Kyiv NAN Ukrainy, Institut jekonomiki i prognozirovanija [in Russian].
17. Grytsenko A. A. (ed). (2008). Institutional architectonics and dynamics of eco-nomic reforms. Kharkov: Fort [in Russian].
18. Grytsenko, A. A. (ed). (2021). Formation of the institutional architecture of the information and network economy / NAS of Ukraine, State University "Institute of Eco-nomics and Forecasting of the NAS of Ukraine"; DNNU "Academy of Financial Man-agement". Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
19. Korsakov, G. B. (2015). Military nanotechnologies: the structure of advanced research in the USA. SShA-Kanada: JePK – USA &Canada: Economics-Politics-Culture, 11: 95-105 [in Russian].
20. Legoyda, V. R. (2004). For what they burned Giordano Bruno. Zhurnal Foma – Foma magazine, 5 (22): 7-10 [in Russian].
21. Marx, K. (1955). Theses on Feuerbach. In Marx K., Engels F. Essays, 2nd ed., vol. 3 [in Russian].
22. New inequalities – new conflicts: ways to overcome. Abstracts of reports and speeches of the participants of the III Congress of the Sociological Association of Ukraine (Kharkov, October 12-13, 2017). Kharkov: Sotsiolohichna asotsiatsiia Ukrainy, Kharkivskyi natsionalnyi universytet imeni V.N. Karazina. (2017) [in Ukrainian].
23. Poljanskij, F. Ja., Drozdov, V. V. (1987). Economic thought of feudal Europe. In: World History of Economic Thought: in 6 volumes, v. 1. Moscow: Mysl [in Russian].
24. Poljanskij, F. Ja., Drozdov, V. V. (1987). Mercantilism. In: World History of Economic Thought. In 6 volumes, v. 1. Moscow: Mysl [in Russian].
25. Serra, A. (1935). A short treatise "On the means to supply in abundance with gold and silver the kingdoms deprived of mines of precious metals". Mercantilism. Digest of articles. Leningrad: Ogiz, Socjekgiz [in Russian].
26. Smith A. (1935а). Inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. In 2 vols., vol. 1. Moscow-Leningrad: Gosudarstvennoe socialno-jekonomicheskoe izdatelstvo [in Russian].
27. Smith A. (1935б). Inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations: in 2 vols, vol. 2. Moscow-Leningrad: Gosudarstvennoe socialno-jekonomicheskoe izdatelstvo [in Russian].
28. Sraffa, P. (1999). Production of commodities by means of commodities. Prelude to a critique economic theory. Moscow: UNITI-DANA [in Russian].
29. Huizinga J. (1989). Autumn of the Middle Ages. Moscow: Nauka [in Russian].
30. Engels, F. Sketch to the Critique of Political Economy. Marx K., Engels F. Es-says, 2nd ed., vol. 1. 544-571 [in Russian].
31. Yaremenko, O. (2022). Ukraine in the institutional dimension of global conflict and natural localization. Ekon. teor. – Economic theory, 2: 90-114. DOI: doi.org/10.15407/etet2022.02.090 [in Ukrainian].
Сalendar of events
M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 |
15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 |
22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 |
29 | 30 |