HOME Welcome to the site of Economic Theory journal

№ 2017/3

Political economy


FILIPENKO Anton 1

1Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv

Economic world: methodology

Ekon. teor. 2017; 3:5-22https://doi.org/10.15407/etet2017.03.005


ABSTRACT ▼


JEL: B41

Article in Russian (pp. 5 - 22) DownloadDownloads :667
Article in Ukrainian (pp. 5 - 22) DownloadDownloads :592

REFERENCES ▼

1. Aristotle. (2008). Policy. Metaphysics. Analytics. Moscow [in Russian].
2. Blaug, M. (2004). The methodology of economic science, or How economists explain. Moscow [in Russian].
3. Kirdina, S. (2013). Methodological individualism and methodological institutionalism. Voprosy jekonomiki – Issues of economics, 10 [in Russian].
4. Polan'i, K. (2002). The great transformation: The political and economic origins of our time. St. Petersburg. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470755679.ch4">doi.org/10.1002/9780470755679.ch4">https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470755679.ch4 [in Russian].
5. Smit, V. (2008). Experimental economics. Moscow [in Russian].
6. Philosophy of Science: Epistemology. Methodology. Culture (2006). Moscow [in Russian].
7. Frolov, D. (2008). Methodological institutionalism: a new perspective on the evolution of economic science. Voprosy jekonomiki – Issues of economics, 11 [in Russian].
8. Habermas, Ju. (1990). Cognition and interest. Filosofskie nauki – Philosophical sciences, 1, 91 [in Russian].
9. Hausman, D. (1994). Economic methodology in a nutshell. Mirovaja jekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnoshenija – World economy and international relations, 2 [in Russian].
10. Shhedrovickij, P.G. (2007). Changes in thinking at the turn of the XXI century: socio-cultural challenges. Voprosy filosofii – Problems of philosophy, 7, 39-40 [in Russian].
11. Backhouse, R.E. (2010, March). Methodology in: action. Journal of economic methodology, 17: 1. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13501780903528929">doi.org/10.1080/13501780903528929">https://doi.org/10.1080/13501780903528929
12. Baumans, M., Davis, J.B. (2010). Economic methodology. Understanding economic as a science. New York.
13. Camerer, C.F. (2008). Neuroeconomics: Using neuroscience to make economic predictions. In Hausman D. (Ed.). The philosophy of economics. An Anthology. Third edition. Cambridge University press.
14. Cohen, B. (2014). Advanced introduction to international political economy. Cheltenham.
15. Dhami, S. (2016). The Foundations of behavioral economic analysis. Oxford University Press.
16. Dopfer, K. (2011). Economics in cultural key: complexity and evolution revisited. In The Elgar companion to recent economic methodology. doi: https://doi.org/10.4337/9780857938077.00022">doi.org/10.4337/9780857938077.00022">https://doi.org/10.4337/9780857938077.00022
17. Dippe, T. (2011, June). How economic methodology became a separate science. Journal of economic methodology, 18: 2. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/1350178X.2011.580196">doi.org/10.1080/1350178X.2011.580196">https://doi.org/10.1080/1350178X.2011.580196
18. Farmer, J. D. (2013). Hypotheses non fingo: problems with the scientific method in economics. Journal of Economic Methodology, 20 (4), 377-385. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/1350178X.2013.859408">doi.org/10.1080/1350178X.2013.859408">https://doi.org/10.1080/1350178X.2013.859408
19. Friedman, M. (2009). The methodology of positive economics. The Methodology of positive economics. Reflections on the Milton Friedman legacy. Cambridge University press. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511581427.002">doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511581427.002">https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511581427.002
20. Fumagalli, R. (2016). Five Theses on Neuroeconomics. Journal of Economic Methodology, 23 (1), 77-96. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/1350178X.2015.1024883">doi.org/10.1080/1350178X.2015.1024883">https://doi.org/10.1080/1350178X.2015.1024883
21. Guala, F. (2005). The methodology of experimental economics. Cambridge University Press. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511614651">doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511614651">https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511614651
22. Hands, D. W. (2004). Deweyan pragmatic philosophy and contemporary economic methodology. In Khalil E.L. (Ed.). Dewey, pragmatism, and economic methodology. London and New York. doi: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203799901.pt4">doi.org/10.4324/9780203799901.pt4">https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203799901.pt4
23. Herfeld, K. (2016, September). The world in axioms: an interview with Patrick Suppes. Journal of economic methodology, 23: 3. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/1350178X.2016.1189126">doi.org/10.1080/1350178X.2016.1189126">https://doi.org/10.1080/1350178X.2016.1189126
24. Heukelom, F. (2011). Behavioral economics. In Davis, J.B., and Hands, D.W. (Eds). The Elgar companion to recent economic methodology. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. doi: https://doi.org/10.4337/9780857938077.00007">doi.org/10.4337/9780857938077.00007">https://doi.org/10.4337/9780857938077.00007
25. Hűbner, J. (2015). Einfűhrung in die theoretische Philosophie. Stuttgart – Weimar. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-05427-2">doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-05427-2">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-05427-2 [in German].
26. Hutchison, T. W. (2009, September). A formative decade: methodological controversy in the 1930. Journal of economic methodology, 16: 3. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13501780903230963">doi.org/10.1080/13501780903230963">https://doi.org/10.1080/13501780903230963
27. Keizer, P. (2015). Multidisciplinary economics. A methodological account. Oxford University press. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199686490.001.0001">doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199686490.001.0001">https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199686490.001.0001
28. Krol, Z. (2015). Platonism and the development of mathematics. Infinity and geometry. Warszawa.
29. Moses, J.W., Knutsen, T.L. (2012). Ways of knowing: competing methodologies and methods in social and political research. 2-nd ed. London. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-00841-1">doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-00841-1">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-00841-1
30. Macroeconomic Policies on Shaky Foundations. Wheither Mainstream Economics? (2009). Marburg.
31. Mulberg, J. (1995). Social limits to economic theory. London and New York.
32. Perry, 6 and Bellamy, Ch. (2012). Principles of methodology. Research design in social science. Los Angeles.
33. Robbins, L. (2008). The nature and significance of economic science. In Hausman, D. (Ed.). The philosophy of economics. An Anthology. 3-d ed. Cambridge University press.
34. Santos, A. C. (2011). Experimental economics. In Davis, J.B., and Hands, D.W. The Elgar companion to recent economic methodology. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. doi: https://doi.org/10.4337/9780857938077.00008">doi.org/10.4337/9780857938077.00008">https://doi.org/10.4337/9780857938077.00008
35. Hausman, D. M. (Ed.). (2008). The philosophy of economics. An Anthology. Third edition. Cambridge University press.
36. Williamson, O. (2009, June). Pragmatic methodology; a sketch with applications to transactions cost economics. Journal of economic methodology, 16: 2. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13501780902940729">doi.org/10.1080/13501780902940729">https://doi.org/10.1080/13501780902940729