№ 2019/1
Political economy HEYETS Valeriy M.1, GRYTSENKO Andrii Andriyovych2
1State Organization “Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine”
2Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine
«TERTIUM DATUR» by Grzegorz W. Kolodko
ABSTRACT ▼
The article reveals the logical and historical grounds of the Grzegorz W. Kolodko’s approach to the interpretation of the phenomenon of China building socialism with Chinese characteristics and developing capitalist relations. Reality goes beyond the dilemma of "socialism or capitalism" and represents something third, having an independent meaning. It is shown that the starting point for the emergence of society and man is a jointly-divided labor whose two sides (jointness and separation) while historically evolving, are embodied on the side of separation in the market economy and capitalism, and on the side of jointness in the state and socialism. On this basis, there arises a confrontation between two opposing systems: capitalism and socialism. The subsequent historical progress turns capitalization and socialization into two complementary processes of the development of society, which are no longer adequate to describe in terms of the two systems. A certain third entity emerges. This proves that "Tertium Datur" by Grzegorz W. Kolodko has not only practical importance, but also deep logical and historical grounds.
Keywords: capitalism, socialism, jointly divided labor, state, market economy, Kolodko, China
JEL: B41, P1, P2
| Article in Russian (pp. 5 - 19) | Download | Downloads :597 |
| Article in Ukrainian (pp. 5 - 19) | Download | Downloads :640 |
REFERENCES ▼
1. Hegel, G. (1971). Science of logic. T. 2. Moscow: Mysl [in Russian].
2. Heyets, V.M. (2009). Society, state, economics: phenomenology of interaction and development. Institute of economics and forecasting of the NAS of Ukraine. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
3. Grinberg, R.S., Rubinstein A.Ya. (2013). Individual & State: An Economic Dilemma. Moscow: Ves mir [in Russian].
4. Hrytsenko, A.A. (2005). The development of forms of exchange, value and money. Kyiv: Osnova [in Russian].
5. Kolodko, G.V. (2014). Where the world is going: The political economy of the future. Moscow: Magistr [in Russian].
6. Kolodko, G.V. (2018). Socialism or capitalism? Tertium datur. Ekon. prognozuvannâ – Economy and forecasting, 1, 7-36. doi:
https://doi.org/10.15407/eip2018.01.007">doi.org/10.15407/eip2018.01.007">https://doi.org/10.15407/eip2018.01.007 [in Ukrainian].
7. Marx, K. (1960). Capital. Vol. 1. In K. Marx, F. Engels. Writings, 23 [in Russian].
8. Kolodko, G.W. (May-June, 2004). Institutions, Policies and Growth. Rivista di Politica Economica, 45-79.
9. Kolodko, G.W. (2014a). The New Pragmatism, or Economics and Policy for the Future. Acta Oeconomica, 64(2), 139-160. doi:
https://doi.org/10.1556/AOecon.64.2014.2.1">doi.org/10.1556/AOecon.64.2014.2.1">https://doi.org/10.1556/AOecon.64.2014.2.1
10. Kolodko, G.W. (2014b). Whither the World: The Political Economy of the Future. Vol. 1. Palgrave Macmillan.
11. Kolodko, G.W., McMahon, W.W. (1987). Stagflation and Shortageflation: A Comparative Approach. Kyklos, 40(2), 176-197. doi:
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6435.1987.tb02671.x">doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6435.1987.tb02671.x">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6435.1987.tb02671.x
12. Kornai, J. (2016). The System Paradigm Revisited Clarification and Additions in the Light of Experiences in the Post-Socialist Countries. Acta Oeconomica, 66(4), 347-569. doi:
https://doi.org/10.1556/032.2016.66.4.1">doi.org/10.1556/032.2016.66.4.1">https://doi.org/10.1556/032.2016.66.4.1
13. Fukuyama, F. (1989). The End of History. The National Interest, Summer. Retrieved from
www.wesjones.com/eoh.htm/
English
Ukrainian 
