№ 2019/1
Political economyZAITSEV Yurii K.1
1Vadym Hetman Kyiv National Economic University
Political economy of the post-industrial society
ABSTRACT ▼
The article substantiates the necessity, possibility and expediency of the formation of concrete institutionalized directions in the subject field of contemporary political economy and, in particular, its direction as political economy of postindustrial society. The works of some modern theorists who consider the political economy of post-industrial society as a \"service political economy\" are critically analyzed, since, in their opinion, the sector of services is the dominant sector of the modern economy.
It has been proved that \"service political economy\" can not a priori cover the whole range of relations, contradictions, tendencies and variants of the development of institutional forms of economy and society in the conditions of the informational method of production that is born on the planet on the basis of a scientific revolution and, therefore, can not be identified with the political economy of post-industrial society. In this context, the field of the subject of political economy of post-industrial society is outlined, the idea is proposed and grounded, according to which the political economy of post-industrial society and contemporary political economy are close in their orientation to the institutional forms of political economy in its development, whose subject field is enriched in conditions of complication of the nature of interrelationships and interdependencies between individual elements and sectors of the architecture of globalized economy and globalized society.
Their subject field is enriched in the context of complexity of the nature of the interconnections and interdependencies between the individual elements and sectors of the globalized economy and the architectonics of globalized society, primarily in such areas as substantivist, institutional, constitutional or new political economy, political economy of a globalized society, political economy of the middle class, and political economy of post-capitalist society.
The article substantiates the position that only the unification of intellectual efforts of representatives of these directions can give a synergistic effect in understanding the laws of functioning and development of the modern economy and society. Also, it allows formulating the principles of an effective theoretical model of the state economic policy, aimed at solving urgent social and economic problems from the standpoint of ensuring the harmonization of the interests of all social groups and layers of the planet\'s population under the conditions of the fourth industrial revolution.
Keywords: political economy of the post-industrial society, contemporary political economy, \"service political economy\", digital economy, fourth industrial revolution, informational production mode, neoliber
JEL: O11, P16, P27
| Article in Russian (pp. 20 - 42) | Download | Downloads :472 |
| Article in Ukrainian (pp. 20 - 42) | Download | Downloads :472 |
REFERENCES ▼
1. Anthology of world philosophy (1971). Vol. 3. Moscow: Mysl [in Russian].
2. Blinder, A.S. (March/April, 2006). Offshoring: The Next Indusrial Revolusion? Foreign Affairs, 113-128. doi:
https://doi.org/10.2307/20031915">doi.org/10.2307/20031915">https://doi.org/10.2307/20031915
3. Blinder, A.S. (2009). Educatiom for Third Industrial Revolution. In Hannway J. and Goldhaber D. (Eds.). Crearting a New Teaching Profession. Urban Institute.
4. Brockhaus (2010). Philosophy: Concepts, thinkers, terms. Sant-Peterburg: Amphora; TID Amphora: RHGA [in Russian].
5. Gamble, E. (2018). The crisis is endless? The collapse of Western prosperity. Moscow: Publishing House of the Higher School of Economics [in Russian].
6. Gnatik, E.N. (2016). Human improvement: trends and benchmarks of education in the era of technological advancement. The problem of human improvement (in the light of new technologies). Moscow: LENAND [in Russian].
7. Freund, C., Weinhold, D. (2002). The Internet and international trade in services. American Economic Review, 92 (2), 236-240. doi:
https://doi.org/10.1257/000282802320189320">doi.org/10.1257/000282802320189320">https://doi.org/10.1257/000282802320189320
8. Zaitsev, Yu.K., Savchuk, V.S. (2011). Contemporary political economy (problems and institutional field of the subject and methodology). Kyiv: KNEU. [in Ukrainian].
9. Zaitsev, Yu., Moskalenko, O. (2018). Contemporary Political Economy as Theoretical Basis of Economic Development of a Society. Book 1. Philosophical and Methodological Principles of Subject Architectonics of the Contemporary Political Economy. Kyiv: KNEU [in Ukrainian].
10. Colombatto, E. (2016). Markets, morality and economic policy: a new approach to the protection of the free market economy. Moscow: Thought [in Russian]
11. Lund, S., Manica, J. (2017). Digital globalization: protection of data flows. Council on Foreign Relations. Tribune News Services. In Ukraine – exclusively for the "2000" [in Russian].
12. Reinert, E.S. (2017). Spontaneous Chaos. Economy of the recession. Moscow: Politicheskaya entsiklopediya [in Russian].
13. Hodgson, D. (2003). Economic Theory and Institutions: The Manifesto of Modern Institutional Economic Theory. Moscow: Delo [in Russian].
14. Schwab, K., Davis, N. (2018). Technologies of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Moscow: Eksmo [in Russian].
15. Corrado, C., Haskel, J. et al. (2012). Intangible Capital and Growth in Advanced Economies: Measurement Methods and Comparative Results. Discussion Paper, 6733. Retrieved from
repec.iza.org/dp6733.pdf/
16. Nordhaus, W.D. (2007). Two Centuries of Productivity Growth in Computing. The Journal of Economic History, 67, 1. doi:
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022050707000058">doi.org/10.1017/S0022050707000058">https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022050707000058
17. Schwab, K., Sala-i-Martín, X. (2016). The Global Competitiveness Report 2016–2017. World Economic Forum. Geneva.
18. Triplett, J.E., Bosworth, B.P. (2004). Productivity in the U.S. Services Sector. New Sources of Economic Growth. Brookings Institution Press Washington, D.C. Retrieved from
www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/productivityintheusservicessector_chapter.pdf/
19. Wren, A. (Ed.) (2013). The Political Economy of the Service Transition. Oxford. Oxford University Press. doi:
https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199657285.001.0001">doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199657285.001.0001">https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199657285.001.0001
English
Ukrainian 
