English
Ukrainian 
| HOME |
№ 2019/3
1Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine
Institutional destructions in the economy: preconditions, mechanisms, consequences
| Ekon. teor. 2019; 3:60-72 | https://doi.org/10.15407/etet2019.03.060 |
ABSTRACT ▼
JEL: O 100
| Article in Russian (pp. 60 - 72) | Download | Downloads :499 |
| Article in Ukrainian (pp. 60 - 72) | Download | Downloads :467 |
REFERENCES ▼
1. Adzhemoglu, D., Robinson, J.A. (2015). Why are some countries rich and others poor. The origin of power, prosperity and poverty. Moscow: AST [in Russian].
2. Aristotle (1983). Works, vol. 4. Moscow: Mysl [in Russian].
3. Auzan, A., Zolotov, A. (2008). Coalitions for modernization: analysis of the possibility of occurrence. Voprosy jekonomiki – Economic issues, 1, 97-107. doi: https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2008-1-97-107">doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2008-1-97-107">https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2008-1-97-107 [in Russian].
4. Balatsky, E. (2007). Fuzzy institutions, population culture, and institutional entropy. Obshhestvo i jekonomika – Society and economics, 5/6, 37-53 [in Russian].
5. Balatsky, E.V. (2017). The concept of inclusive institutions and its applications. Obshhestvennye nauki i sovremennost – Social sciences and modernity, 3, 143-156 [in Russian].
6. Durkheim, E. (1996). On the division of social labor. Moscow: Canon [in Russian].
7. Coase, R. Firm, market and law. Moscow Libertarium: Institute of Freedom. Retrieved from www.libertarium.ru/libertarium/l_lib_firm0 [in Russian].
8. Liszt, F. (2016). National system of political economy. Moscow: Socium. doi: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315442242">doi.org/10.4324/9781315442242">https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315442242 [in Russian].
9. Lytkina, E.I. (2015). Social structure in the three theories of anomie. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filosofija. Sociologija. Politologija – Bulletin of Tomsk State University. Philosophy. Sociology. Political science, 1:29. doi: https://doi.org/10.17223/1998863X/29/19">doi.org/10.17223/1998863X/29/19">https://doi.org/10.17223/1998863X/29/19 [in Russian].
10. Merton, R.K. (2006). Social theory and social structure. Moscow: AST, Hranitel [in Russian].
11. North, D., Wallis, D., Weingast, B. (2011). Violence and social order. Conceptual framework for the interpretation of the written history of mankind. Moscow: Izd-vo Instituta Gajdara [in Russian].
12. Smorodinskaya, N.V. (2015). Globalized economy: from hierarchies to network structure. Moscow: IJe RAN [in Russian].
13. Williamson, O. (1996). The economic institutions of capitalism. Firms, markets "relational contracting". St. Petersburg: Lenizdat [in Russian].
14. Frolov, D. (2019, July). From institutions to extites and further to a post-institutional theory of institutional anomalies. Retrieved from mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/95960/MPRA Paper No. 95960, posted 11 17:35 UTC [in Russian].
15. Schumpeter, J.A. (1982). Theory of economic development. Moscow: Progress [in Russian].
16. Arora, S., Barak, B. (2009). Complexity Theory: A Modern Approach, Cambridge University Press.
17. Bauman, Z. (1996). Alone Again – Ethics After Certainty. London: Demos.
18. Burnes, B. (2005). Complexity theories and organizational change; International. Journal of Management Reviews, 7(2). doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2005.00107.x">doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2005.00107.x">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2005.00107.x
19. Byrne, D. (1998). Complexity Theory and the Social Sciences: An Introduction. London, Routledge.
20. Bernburg, J.G. (2002). Anomie, social change, and crime: A theoretical examination of institutional-anomie theory. British Journal of Criminology, 42, 729-742. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/42.4.729">doi.org/10.1093/bjc/42.4.729">https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/42.4.729
21. Massimo, E. (1995). The “Creative Destruction” in Economic and Political Institutions. Department of Economics University of Trento.
22. Giddens, A. (1991). Fate, Risk and Security. A.Giddens. Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Cambridge: Polity Press.
23. Greve, B. (2013). The Routledge Handbook of the Welfare State. Routledge. doi: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203084229">doi.org/10.4324/9780203084229">https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203084229
24. Messner, S. (2013). Rosenfeld R. Crime and the American Dream. USA: Wadsworth: Cengage Learning.
25. Rustin, M., Massey, D. (2014, December). Rethinking the neoliberal world order. Soundings, 116-135.
26. Parsons, T. (1966). The Concept of Society: The Components and Their Interrelations. In Parsons T. Societies: Evolutionary and Comparative Perspectives. Englewood Cliffs (NJ): Prentice-Hall.
27. World Economic Outlook Database. October 2018. Retrieved from www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2018/02/weodata/index.aspx
28. Zhenhua Su, Yanyu Ye, Pu Wang. (2018, November 28). Social change and generalized anomie: Why economic development has reduced social trust in China. First Published. Research. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580918812281">doi.org/10.1177/0268580918812281">https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580918812281
2. Aristotle (1983). Works, vol. 4. Moscow: Mysl [in Russian].
3. Auzan, A., Zolotov, A. (2008). Coalitions for modernization: analysis of the possibility of occurrence. Voprosy jekonomiki – Economic issues, 1, 97-107. doi: https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2008-1-97-107">doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2008-1-97-107">https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2008-1-97-107 [in Russian].
4. Balatsky, E. (2007). Fuzzy institutions, population culture, and institutional entropy. Obshhestvo i jekonomika – Society and economics, 5/6, 37-53 [in Russian].
5. Balatsky, E.V. (2017). The concept of inclusive institutions and its applications. Obshhestvennye nauki i sovremennost – Social sciences and modernity, 3, 143-156 [in Russian].
6. Durkheim, E. (1996). On the division of social labor. Moscow: Canon [in Russian].
7. Coase, R. Firm, market and law. Moscow Libertarium: Institute of Freedom. Retrieved from www.libertarium.ru/libertarium/l_lib_firm0 [in Russian].
8. Liszt, F. (2016). National system of political economy. Moscow: Socium. doi: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315442242">doi.org/10.4324/9781315442242">https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315442242 [in Russian].
9. Lytkina, E.I. (2015). Social structure in the three theories of anomie. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filosofija. Sociologija. Politologija – Bulletin of Tomsk State University. Philosophy. Sociology. Political science, 1:29. doi: https://doi.org/10.17223/1998863X/29/19">doi.org/10.17223/1998863X/29/19">https://doi.org/10.17223/1998863X/29/19 [in Russian].
10. Merton, R.K. (2006). Social theory and social structure. Moscow: AST, Hranitel [in Russian].
11. North, D., Wallis, D., Weingast, B. (2011). Violence and social order. Conceptual framework for the interpretation of the written history of mankind. Moscow: Izd-vo Instituta Gajdara [in Russian].
12. Smorodinskaya, N.V. (2015). Globalized economy: from hierarchies to network structure. Moscow: IJe RAN [in Russian].
13. Williamson, O. (1996). The economic institutions of capitalism. Firms, markets "relational contracting". St. Petersburg: Lenizdat [in Russian].
14. Frolov, D. (2019, July). From institutions to extites and further to a post-institutional theory of institutional anomalies. Retrieved from mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/95960/MPRA Paper No. 95960, posted 11 17:35 UTC [in Russian].
15. Schumpeter, J.A. (1982). Theory of economic development. Moscow: Progress [in Russian].
16. Arora, S., Barak, B. (2009). Complexity Theory: A Modern Approach, Cambridge University Press.
17. Bauman, Z. (1996). Alone Again – Ethics After Certainty. London: Demos.
18. Burnes, B. (2005). Complexity theories and organizational change; International. Journal of Management Reviews, 7(2). doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2005.00107.x">doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2005.00107.x">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2005.00107.x
19. Byrne, D. (1998). Complexity Theory and the Social Sciences: An Introduction. London, Routledge.
20. Bernburg, J.G. (2002). Anomie, social change, and crime: A theoretical examination of institutional-anomie theory. British Journal of Criminology, 42, 729-742. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/42.4.729">doi.org/10.1093/bjc/42.4.729">https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/42.4.729
21. Massimo, E. (1995). The “Creative Destruction” in Economic and Political Institutions. Department of Economics University of Trento.
22. Giddens, A. (1991). Fate, Risk and Security. A.Giddens. Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Cambridge: Polity Press.
23. Greve, B. (2013). The Routledge Handbook of the Welfare State. Routledge. doi: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203084229">doi.org/10.4324/9780203084229">https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203084229
24. Messner, S. (2013). Rosenfeld R. Crime and the American Dream. USA: Wadsworth: Cengage Learning.
25. Rustin, M., Massey, D. (2014, December). Rethinking the neoliberal world order. Soundings, 116-135.
26. Parsons, T. (1966). The Concept of Society: The Components and Their Interrelations. In Parsons T. Societies: Evolutionary and Comparative Perspectives. Englewood Cliffs (NJ): Prentice-Hall.
27. World Economic Outlook Database. October 2018. Retrieved from www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2018/02/weodata/index.aspx
28. Zhenhua Su, Yanyu Ye, Pu Wang. (2018, November 28). Social change and generalized anomie: Why economic development has reduced social trust in China. First Published. Research. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580918812281">doi.org/10.1177/0268580918812281">https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580918812281
© Institute for economics and forecasting 2024. All rights reserved
