№ 2019/4

1. Blakely, E. (1994). Planning Local Economic Development: Theory and Practice. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
2. Burlai, T. (2016). Modern policy of the European Union in the context of social justice. Ekon. teor. – Economic theory, 4, 51-64. doi: https://doi.org/10.15407/etet2016.04.051">doi.org/10.15407/etet2016.04.051">https://doi.org/10.15407/etet2016.04.051 [in Ukrainian].
3. Cafaro, P. (2015). Three ways to think about the sixth mass extinction. Biological Conservation, 192, 387-393. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2015.10.017">doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2015.10.017">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2015.10.017
4. Campbell, J. (2007). Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways: An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32, 946-967. doi: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.25275684">doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.25275684">https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.25275684
5. Caragliu, A., Del Bo C., Nijkamp P. (2011). Smart Cities in Europe. Journal of Urban Technology, 18 (2), 65-82. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2011.601117">doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2011.601117">https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2011.601117
6. Castells, M. (1996). The Rise of the Network Society. The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture. Vol. I. Malden, MA; Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
7. Castells, M. (2000). Toward a Sociology of the Network Society. Contemporary Sociology, 29: 5, 693-699. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/2655234">doi.org/10.2307/2655234">https://doi.org/10.2307/2655234
8. Cherevko, H. Cherevko, I. (2010). Balanced development of rural areas. Ahrarna ekonomika – Agrarian economy, 3 (1-2), 36-40 [in Ukrainian].
9. Christoforou, A. (2017) Social Capital: Intuition, Precept, Concept and Theory. Social Capital and Local Development. London: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54277-5_2">doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54277-5_2">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54277-5_2
10. Cooke, P. (1992) Regional innovation systems: competitive regulation in the new Europe. Geoforum, 23, 365-382. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7185(92)90048-9">doi.org/10.1016/0016-7185(92)90048-9">https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7185(92)90048-9
11. Cooke, P. (2001). Strategy for regional innovation systems: Learning transfer and applications. Cardiff: Centre for Advanced Studies Cardiff University.
12. Crist, E. (2012). Abundant Earth and Population. Life on the Brink: Environmentalists confront Overpopulation. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.
13. Denhardt, R.B., Denhardt, J.V. (2002). The New Public Service: Serving Rather than Steering. Public Administration Review, 60: 6, 549-559. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/0033-3352.00117">doi.org/10.1111/0033-3352.00117">https://doi.org/10.1111/0033-3352.00117
14. Eisinger, P.K. (1988). The Rise of the Entrepreneurial State. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
15. Godfrey, P. C., Lewis, B. W. (2018). Pragmatism and pluralism: A moral foundation for stakeholder theory in the 21st century. All Faculty Publications. 2073. Retrieved from scholarsarchive.byu.edu/facpub/2073
16. Hanifan, L.J. (1916). The rural school community centre. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 67, 130-138.
17. Harrison, J., Freeman, R., Cavalcanti Sá de Abreu, M. (2015). Stakeholder Theory As an Ethical Approach to Effective Management: applying the theory to multiple contexts. Review of Business Management,17 (55), 858-869. doi: https://doi.org/10.7819/rbgn.v17i55.2647">doi.org/10.7819/rbgn.v17i55.2647">https://doi.org/10.7819/rbgn.v17i55.2647
18. Hassink, R. (2004). The Learning Region: A Policy Concept to Unlock Regional Economies from Path Dependency? Regionalization of Innovation Policy: Options and Experiences. Retrieved from citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/
19. Heyets, V. (2017). New pragmatism as an instrument to achieve a better future. Ekon. teor. – Economic theory, 1, 5-24. doi: https://doi.org/10.15407/etet2017.01.005">doi.org/10.15407/etet2017.01.005">https://doi.org/10.15407/etet2017.01.005 [in Ukrainian].
20. Hendry, J. (2001). Missing the target: Normative stakeholder theory and the corporate governance debate. Business Ethics Quarterly, 11, 159-176. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/3857875">doi.org/10.2307/3857875">https://doi.org/10.2307/3857875
21. Hoffman, A. J. (2001). Linking organizational and field-level analyses: The diffusion of corporate environmental practice. Organization & Environment, 14 (2), 133-156. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026601142001">doi.org/10.1177/1086026601142001">https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026601142001
22. Hrytsenko, A. (2016). Reconstructive economic development: contents, guidelines and the vector of social justice. Ekon. teor. – Economic theory, 4, 5-18. doi: https://doi.org/10.15407/etet2016.04.005">doi.org/10.15407/etet2016.04.005">https://doi.org/10.15407/etet2016.04.005 [in Ukrainian].
23. Jamali, D., Neville, B. (2011). Convergence versus divergence of CSR in developing countries: An embedded multi-layered institutional lens. Journal of Business Ethics, 102, 599-621. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0830-0">doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0830-0">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0830-0
24. Khovrak, I. V. (2019). Evolution of the paradigm of regional development. Modern Economics. 13, 246-252 [in Ukrainian].
25. Kodym, O., Unucka, J. (2017). Smart Life in Smart Region. MMS conference. Retrieved from eudl.eu/pdf/10.4108/eai.22-11-2017.2274120
26. Kopnina, H., Blewitt, J. (2014). Sustainable Business: Key issues. New York: Routledge.
27. Kopnina, H., Cocis, A. (2017). Environmental Education: Reflecting on Application of Environmental Attitudes Measuring Scale in Higher Education Students. Education Sciences, 7, 69. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci7030069">doi.org/10.3390/educsci7030069">https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci7030069
28. Leliuk, S.V. (2015). Financial security of economic systems: a system-behavioral approach. Naukovyi visnyk Uzhhorodskoho universytetu: Seriia Ekonomika – Uzhgorod University Scientific Bulletin: Economics Series, 1 (45/1), 197-200 [in Ukrainian].
29. Lenoir, R. (1974). Les exclus: Un Francais sur Dix. Paris: Editions de Seuil.
30. Marek, E. M., Polowczyk, J. (2018). Wpływ Richarda H. Thalera na rozwój ekonomii behawioralnej. Intercathedra. 4 (37), 369-378 [in Polish].
31. Mączyńska, E. (2018). Chwilówkowe pożyczki pieniężnie w kontekście ekonomii behawioralnej i regulacyjnych funkcji państwa. Rynek firm pożyczkowych w Polsce: Teoria i praktyka. Warszawa: Polskie Towarzystwo Ekonomiczne [in Polish].
32. Morgan, K. (1997). The learning region: institutions, innovation and regional renewal. Regional Studies, 31, 491-503. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343409750132289">doi.org/10.1080/00343409750132289">https://doi.org/10.1080/00343409750132289
33. Mitchell, R.K., Agle, B.R., Wood, D.J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22, 853-886. doi: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1997.9711022105">doi.org/10.5465/amr.1997.9711022105">https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1997.9711022105
34. Parmar, B.L., et al. (2010). Stakeholder theory: The state of the art. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
35. Phillips, R., Freeman, R.E., Wicks, A.C. (2003). What stakeholder theory is not. Business Ethics Quarterly, 13 (4), 479-502. doi: https://doi.org/10.5840/beq200313434">doi.org/10.5840/beq200313434">https://doi.org/10.5840/beq200313434
36. Porter, M.E. (1990). The Competitive Advantage of Nations. Harvard Business Review, 68 (2), 73-93.
37. Porter, M., Ketels, C. (2009). Clusters and Industrial Districts: Common Roots, Different Perspectives. A Handbook of Industrial Districts. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. doi: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781781007808.00024">doi.org/10.4337/9781781007808.00024">https://doi.org/10.4337/9781781007808.00024
38. Rees, W. (2010). What’s blocking sustainability? Human nature, cognition, and denial. Sustainability: Science, Practice, and Policy, 6 (2), 13-25. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2010.11908046">doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2010.11908046">https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2010.11908046
39. Rolston, H. (2015). Environmental Ethics for Tomorrow: Sustaining the Biosphere. Sustainability: Key issues. New York: Routledge.
40. Seligman, M. (2011). Flourish: a visionary new understanding of happiness and wellbeing. New York: Free Press.
41. Shoreman-Ouimet, E., Kopnina, H. (2016). Conservation and Culture: Beyond Anthropocentrism. New York: Routledge. doi: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315858630">doi.org/10.4324/9781315858630">https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315858630
42. Spear, R., et al. (2001). Tackling Social Exclusion in Europe. The Contribution of the Social Economy, Aldershot: Ashgate. Retrieved from w3.uqo.ca/
43. Strzelecki, Z. (2011). Gospodarka regionalna i lokalna w Polsce. Czynniki i bariery rozwojowe. Warszawa: Oficyna Wydawnicza SGH [in Polish].
44. Sukhenko, V.H. (2017). The linguistic picture of the world of Ukrainians through the prism of oxymoron. Science and Education a New Dimension. Philology, 124 (34), 72-75 [in Ukrainian].
45. Thaler, R.H., Sunstein, C.R. (2008). Nudge. Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Hapinness. New Haven & London: Yale University Press.
46. Verhun, A.M., Tarasenko, I.O. (2014). The concept of sustainable development in the context of globalization. Visnyk KNUTD – KNUTD Bulletin, 2, 207-218 [in Ukrainian].
47. Washington, H. (2015). Demystifying Sustainability: Towards Real Solutions. New York: Routledge.
48. Yaremenko, O. (2016). Contradictory unity of economic efficiency and social justice as a factor for economic systems functioning and evolution. Ekon. teor. – Economic theory, 4, 19-32. doi: https://doi.org/10.15407/etet2016.04.019">doi.org/10.15407/etet2016.04.019">https://doi.org/10.15407/etet2016.04.019 [in Ukrainian].