№ 2020/2
Political economyMANDYBURA Viktor O.1
1Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine
Political economy of alienation and exploitation of labor: theoretical ideologues and objective reality
ABSTRACT ▼
The article deals with subjective reasons of the formation of theoretical ideologemes and reveals their special nature. The author analyzes approaches of the representatives of the three main doctrines of political economy to the understanding of the content of transformation in the relations of alienation and exploitation of labor under the conditions of global domination of corporate monopolistic capitalism. Based on critical analysis, revealed the content of common theoretical ideologemes of refuting the alienation and exploitation of labor in modern conditions, including: the theory of "welfare economy"; theory of "human capital"; theory of "expansion - enrichment - humanization" programs of labor functions; and theory of implementation of the principles of "strategic management".
The author considers the problems of determining the real degree of alienation and exploitation of labor, justifies his proposal on the need for practical implementation of an additional indicator "rate of alienation of the necessary product", and reveals the content of the method to calculate this indicator. Presented a detailed characteristic of modern conditions and revealed the reasons and factors of the extreme character of alienation and exploitation of labor in Ukraine.
Keywords:alienation of labor, exploitation of labor, labor, capital, contradiction of labor-capital relations, theoretical ideologeme, socio-economic confrontation, socio-economic justice, rate of exploitation, rate of alienation of the necessary product
JEL: А13
Article in Russian (pp. 20 - 53) | Download | Downloads :345 |
Article in Ukrainian (pp. 20 - 53) | Download | Downloads :215 |
REFERENCES ▼
1. Bogle, J. C. (2011). The battle for the soul of capitalism. Moscow: Izdatelstvo Instituta Gajdara [in Russian].
2. Hrytsenko, A. A. (2016). Reconstructive economic development: contents, guidelines and the vector of social justice. Ekon. teor. – Economic theory, 4, 5-18.
doi.org/10.15407/etet2016.04.005 [in Russian].
3. Hrytsenko, A. A. (2017). Social justice as a component of the architecture of secure economic development. Ukrainskyi sotsium – Ukrainian society, 4, 9-21 [in Ukrainian].
4. Hrytsenko, A. A. (2017). Architectonics of economic security. Kyiv: Institute for Economics and Forecasting [in Ukrainian].
5. Dunning, Т. J. (1860). Trades Unions and strikes. London: Quarterly Reviewer.
6. Soto, H. de (2004). The riddle of capital. Why capitalism triumphs in the West and is defeated throughout the rest of the world. Moscow: Olimp-biznes [in Russian].
7. Zingales, L., Rajan, R. (2004). Saving Capitalism from the Capitalists: Unleashing the Power of Financial Markets to Create Wealth and Spread Opportunity. Moscow: Institut kompleksnyh strategicheskih issledovanij. TEIS [in Russian].
8. Kuzmina, V. I. (1980). Standard budgets of the working population of the United States (questions of methodology and methodology). Moscow: CJeMI AN SSSR [in Russian].
9. McConnell, C. R., Brue, S.L. (1992). Economics: Principles, problems and policies: in 2 vol. Moscow: Respublika. Vol. 1 [in Russian].
10. Mandybura, V. O. (1998). The standard of living of the population of Ukraine and the problems of reforming the mechanisms of its regulation. Kyiv: Parlamentske vyd-vo [in Ukrainian].
11. Mandybura, V. O. (2016). Political and economic aspects of the differenciation of marginal states of the reproduction of population. Ekon. teor. – Economic theory, 3, 18-34.
doi.org/10.15407/etet2016.03.018[in Ukrainian].
12. Mandybura, V., Tomchuk-Ponomarenko, N. (2018). Ways of providing social and economic justice in personal income taxation. Ekon. teor. – Economic theory, 3, 46-56.
doi.org/10.15407/etet2018.03.059 [in Ukrainian].
13. Marx, K. (1955–1981). Capital. A Critique of Political Economy. Volume I. Book One: The Process of Production of Capital. Marx, K., Engels, F. Compositions. 2nd ed. Vol. 23. Moscow [in Russian].
14. Marx, K. (1955–1981). Capital: A Critique of Political Economy, Vol. III. Book 3. The Process of Capitalist Production as a Whole. Marx, K., Engels, F. Compositions. 2nd ed. Vol. 25. Part 1. Moscow [in Russian].
15. Parenti, M. (2006). Democracy for the Few is a provocative interpretation of American Government. Moscow: Pokolenie [in Russian].
16. Stiglitz, J. E. (1998). Economics of the public sector. Kyiv: Osnovy [in Ukrainian].
17. Stiglitz, J. E. (2015). The Price of Inequality: How Today’s Divided Society Endangers our Future. Moscow: Jeksmo [in Russian].
18. Stiglitz J. E. (2004) Evaluating Economic Change. Daedalus (Summer). Vol. 133. P. 18–25.
doi.org/10.1162/0011526041504551
19. Huntington, E. H. (1961). Chairman. The Heller Committee for Research in Social Economics of the University of California.