.
Увійти 
|
HOME |
№ 2021/1
1Institute for Economics and Forecasting NAS of Ukraine
Evolution of institutional forms of competitive relations: from the first to the fourth industrial revolution
Ekon. teor. 2021; 1:20-40 | https://doi.org/10.15407/etet2021.01.020 |
ABSTRACT ▼
The active introduction of information and communication technologies has significantly accelerated the transformation of institutional forms, and methods and mechanisms of competition. Network structures of information platforms (IP) have replaced the value chains. In these conditions, the study of development patterns of the institutional principles of successful competition becomes especially relevant. The methodological basis of the study is based on the use of tools of dialectical, historical-genetic, structural, and complementary qualitative analysis. The evolution of key institutional forms of competition in the process of transition from the First to the Fourth Industrial Revolutions is studied. The peculiarities of the role and place of IP as a universal institution and business model that receives competitive advantages in the conditions of active dissemination of digital technologies are revealed. The structure, the main sections of classification and directions of IP activities are presented. The author reveals the connection of the mechanisms for ensuring the IP competitiveness with their complementarity to the conditions of digitalization. The complementary place in the environment of the competitive interaction of IP as a network institutional form of the epoch of informatization is substantiated. It displaces in competitive markets hierarchical structures that were complementary to the needs of the industrial economy era. It is shown that the introduction of IP as the leading institutional structure of the information economy causes radical changes in the directions, the mechanism of competition and the competition policy of the state.
Keywords:institutes, information economy, information platforms, complementarity, competition, industrial revolutions
JEL: N10, O33
Article in Russian (pp. 20 - 40) | Download | Downloads :143 |
Article in Ukrainian (pp. 20 - 40) | Download | Downloads :133 |
REFERENCES ▼
2. Allen, R. (2014). The British industrial revolution in the global picture of the world. Moscow: Izd-vo in-ta Gajdara [in Russian].
3. Bradford DeLong, J. (2002). Robber barons. Essays on the world economy: Outstanding Economists of the World at the Carnegie Moscow Center. Moscow: Gendalf [in Russian].
4. Dobbin, F. (2013). Formation of industrial policy. The United States, Britain and France during the early days of the rail industry. Moscow: ID VShE [in Russian].
5. Djatlov, V. (2006). Traders, outsiders, or sent by God? Moscow: V. Djatlov [in Russian].
6. Sombart, W. (2005). Bourgeois: on the history of the spiritual development of a modern economic person / Collected Works. In 3 volumes. Vol. 1. St. Petersburg: Vladimir Dal [in Russian].
7. Castells, M. (2000). Information age. Moscow: GU VShE [in Russian].
8. Castells, M. (2004). Galaxy internet. Ekaterinburg: U-Faktoriya [in Russian].
9. Castells, M., Himanen, P. (2002). Information Society and the Welfare State. Finnish model. Moscow: LogoƩ. doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199256990.001.0001 [in Russian].
10. Lapickij, M. (1998). Labor and business in the mirror of religions. Moscow: Novyj vek [in Russian].
11. Lypov, V. (2018). Competitive strategy of Ukraine's development in the conditions of globalization. Part II. Competitive strategy of Ukraine's integration into the international economic space. Ekonomika Ukrainy – Economy of Ukraine, 4, 3-17. doi.org/10.15407/economyukr.2018.03.021 [in Ukraine].
12. Lypov, V. (2020). Social and economic considerations of the competitive policy USA and EU: information (digital) platforms. Ukrainskyi shchorichnyk z yevropeiskykh intehratsiinykh studii – Ukrainian Yearlybook of European Integration Studies, V, 79-100. Kyiv:APREI [in Ukraine].
13. Zhivotovskaja, I., Chernomorova, T. et al. (2014). New production systems and regional aspects of globalization. Moscow: INION [in Russian].
14. Polanyi, K. (2002). The Great Transformation: The Political and Spiritual Origins of Our Time. St. Petersburg: Aleteja [in Russian].
15. Porter, M. (1993). International competition. Moscow: Progress [in Russian].
16. Rifkin, J. (2017). Industrial Revolution 3: How Horizontal Interactions Are Changing the Energy, Economy and the World. Moscow: Alpina non-fikshin [in Russian].
17. Salvioli, G. (1922). Capitalism in the Ancient World. Study of the history of the economic life of Rome. Harkov-Ekaterinoslav: Vseukrainskoe gosudarstvennoe izdatelstvo [in Russian].
18. Sokolenko, S. (2000). Clusters in the global economy. Kyiv: Logos [in Ukraine].
19. Tocqueville A. de. (2000). Democracy in America. Moscow: Ves Mir. doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226924564.001.0001 [in Russian].
20. Friedman, T. (2006). The World is Flat 3.0. A Brief History of the Twenty-First Century. Moscow: AST [in Russian].
21. Schwab, K. (2019). The fourth industrial revolution. Kyiv: Fors Ukraina [in Russian].
22. Schumacher, E. (2012). Small Is Beautiful: A Study of Economics As If People Mattered. Moscow: ID VShE [in Russian].
23. Baldwin, R. (2016). The Great Convergence: Information Technology and the New Globalization. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
24. Caillaud, B., Jullien, B. (2003). Chicken&egg: competition among intermediation service providers. RAND Journal of Economics, 34: 2, 309-328. doi.org/10.2307/1593720
25. Cairncross, F. (1997). The Deaht of Distance: How the Communications Revolutions Will Change Our Lives. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
26. Casadesus-Masanell, R., Ruiz-Aliseda, F. (2009). Platform competition, compatibility, and social efficiency. NET Institute Working Paper, 08.32. doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1440150
27. Greif, A. (2006). Institutions and the Path to the Modern Economy: Lessons from Medieval Trade. Cambridge: Cambridge university press. doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791307
28. Haucap, J., Heimeschoff, U. (2013). Google, Facebook, Amazon, eBay: Is the Internet Driving Competition or Market Monopolization? Düsseldorf Institute for Competition Economics (DICE)Discussion Paper, 83. doi.org/10.1007/s10368-013-0247-6
29. Jullien, B., Sand-Zantman, W. (2016). Network Effects. Report, IDEI-TSE. Retrieved 10.10.2020 from
idei.fr/sites/default/files/IDEI/documents/conf/trading2016/rapport/networkeffect.pdf
30. Lal D. (1998). Unintended Consequences: The Impact of Factor Endowments, Culture, and Politics on Long-Run Economic Performance. Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press. doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/6996.001.0001
31. Baldwin, R. (2016). The Great Convergence: Information Technology and the New Globalization. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
32. Rochet J.C., Tirole J. (2003). Platform Competition in Two-Sided Markets. Journal of the European Economic Association, 1(4), р. 990-1029. doi.org/10.1162/154247603322493212
33. Van Gorp N., Batura O. (2015). Challenges for Competition Policy in the Digitalised Economy. Study for the ECON Committee, European Parliament.
34. Van Gorp N., Honnefelder S. (2015). Challenges for Competition Policy in the Digitalised Economy. Digiworld Economic Journal, 99, 149.
Сalendar of events
M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 |
27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |