HOME Welcome to the site of Economic Theory journal

№ 2021/4

History of economic thought


FILIPENKO Anton 1

1Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv

Economic world: logic

Ekon. teor. 2021; 4:95-112https://doi.org/10.15407/etet2021.04.095


ABSTRACT ▼


JEL: P10; P16

Article in Russian (pp. 95 - 112) DownloadDownloads :116
Article in Ukrainian (pp. 95 - 112) DownloadDownloads :116

REFERENCES ▼

1. Hrytsenko, A. A. (2015). Contemporary crisis on the context of the logic of societal-economic development. Ekonomika Ukrainy – Economy of Ukraine, 6, 18-36 [in Ukrainian].
2. Castells, M. (2000). The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture. Moscow [in Russian].
3. Keynes, J. M. (2007). The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. The Selected Works. Moscow: GU VShJe [in Russian].
4. Leontief, V. V. (2007). Selected Works in 3 Vol. Vol. 3. Selected Worksarticles. Moscow [in Russian].
5. Marx, K. (1982). Capital. Critique of Political Economy. Vol. 1, Vol. 2, Vol. 3. Кyiv [in Ukrainian].
6. North, D. C. (2010). Understanding the Process of Economic Change.Transl. Moscow: Izd. dom Gos. un-ta — Vysshej shkoly ekonomiki [in Russian].
7. Piketti, T. (2016). Capital in XXI century. Кyiv: Nash format [in Ukrainian].
8. Popper, K. (2010). The Logic of scientific discovery. Moscow: AST; Astrel [in Russian].
9. Samuelson, P. A. (1992). Economics. Vol 1. Moscow: Algon [in Russian].
10. Smith, A. (2001). The Wealth of Nations. An Inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of Nations. Кyiv: Port-Royal [in Ukrainian].
11. Filipenko, A. (2020). Digital Economy: Theorethical and Applied Aspect. Econ. teor. – Economic theory, 2, 54-66. doi.org/10.15407/etet2020.02.054 [in Ukrainian].
12. Filipenko, A. (2014). Economic World: the Ontology. Econ. teor. – Economic theory, 3, 38-47 [in Ukrainian].
13. Filipenko, A. S. (2017). Basic methodological views on economic theory. In Society, Economics and Economic Science in the XXI Century: materials of the II International. scientific-practical conf.\ April 21-22, 2017 (p. 15-18). Kyiv: KNEU [in Ukrainian].
14. Sztompka, P. (2020). Sociology. Analysis of society. Lviv: Kolir PRO [in Ukrainian].
15. Almeida, F. (May-Aug 2016). Society and brain: A complementary approachto Thorstein Veblen’s conspicuous consumerbased on Tibor Sci-tovsky’s neuropsychology. Nova econ, 26 (2). doi.org/10.1590/0103-6351/2994
16. Bates, R. H. (1996). Institutions as Investments. Development Discussion Paper, 527.
17. Becchio, G. (2020). The Two Blades of Occam’s Razor in Economics: Logical and Heuristic. Economic Thought, 9.1: 1-17.
18. Cairnes, J. E. (2001). The Character and Logical Method of Political Economy. Kitchener.
19. Jagodziński W. (2017). The concept of institutional logic in the research of the spatial organization of economics. World Scientific News, 72, 618-627. Retrieved from www.worldscientificnews.com
20. Kuczynski, J. (1937). Labour Conditions in Western Europe 1820 to 1935. London.
21. Maddison A. (2003). The World Economy: Historical Statistics. Paris. doi.org/10.1787/9789264104143-en
22. Mestrovic S. G. (2010). Vicious abstractionism and the Darwinian struggle for existence of Veblen’s and Durkheim’s ideas. Sosyoloji Dergisi, 3. Dizi, 21, 61-84.
23. Morck, R. (January 2021). Kindleberger Cycles: Method in the Madness of Crowds? Working Paper, 28411. Retrieved from www.nber.org/papers/w28411. doi.org/10.3386/w28411
24. Robinson, J. (1956). The Accumulation of Capital. London.
25. Robinson, J. (1971). Economic Heresies. New York.
26. Priest, G. (2017). Logic: A Very Short Introduction. Second Edition. Oxford University Press.
27. Schwab, K. (2016). The Fourth Industrial Revolution. Geneva.
28. Soskise, D., Bates, R. H., Epstein, D. (1992). Ambition and Constraint: The Stabilizing Role of Institutions. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organizations, 8. doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780198811701.001.0001
29. Mäki, U. (ed.) (2009). The Methodology of Positive Economics. Reflections on the Milton Friedman legacy. Cambridge University Press. doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511581427
30. The Technology and Innovation Report 2021. Geneva, 2021.