| . |
Ukrainian
English
|
| НА ГОЛОВНУ |
№ 2026/1
1ДУ Інститут економіки та прогнозування НАН України
Традиціоналістський виклик Європейському зеленому курсу
| Ekon. teor. 2026; 1:72-97 | https://doi.org/10.15407/etet2026.01.072 |
АНОТАЦІЯ ▼
У контексті повторного виходу США з Паризької кліматичної угоди й потужного зростання впливу в Європі партій та рухів, що орієнтуються на образ нової моделі національної реконструкції та світового порядку, що просувається президентом США Д. Трампом, досліджено системні впливи євротрампізму, як нового феномена європейської політики, на Європейський зелений курс (ЄЗК). Для цілей дослідження застосовано міждисциплінарний та компаративний підходи, методи політичної економії, теорії нового культурного розколу, кейсів (фокусуючись на Німеччині, як ключовій євроінтеграційній країні та економіці), емпірико-аналітичний та рефлексивний. Обґрунтовано, що сучасний традиціоналістський виклик ЄЗК спрямований передусім проти глобалістського виміру та змісту Європейської кліматичної політики, а не проти традиційного регіонального чи місцевого захисту довкілля. Показано, що істотне посилення протягом 2020-х років (особливо з початку 2025 р.) партіями євротрампістського спрямування своїх позицій в Європарламенті та національних парламентах країн ЄС, зокрема можливостей впливати на процеси ухвалення рішень у сфері кліматичної політики через коаліційні угоди та активізацію взаємодії з традиційними правоцентристськими партіями на всіх рівнях, збільшує внутрішньоструктурні ризики для імплементації ЄЗК й становить в середньостроковій перспективі реальну загрозу порушення кліматичного консенсусу на рівні ЄС й навіть згортання ЄЗК. Оскільки відповідні плани економічного розвитку та дорожні карти інтеграції України до ЄС пов'язані з цілями ЄЗК, існує потреба в більш системному та критичному розгляді перспектив поступового збільшення оподаткування викидів та викопного палива в Україні, а також впровадження Механізму коригування вуглецевих викидів з урахуванням високих й далі зростаючих ризиків для імплементації ЄЗК.
Ключові слова:євротрампізм, глибинна екологія, Паризька кліматична угода, Європейський зелений курс, кліматичний скептицизм.
| Стаття українською мовою (cтор. 72 - 97) | Завантажити | Завантажень : 33 |
СПИСОК ЛІТЕРАТУРИ ▼
1. Бучин, М. А. (2023). Кліматична політика ЄС в умовах повномасштабної російсько-української війни. Вісник НТУУ «КПІ». Політологія. Соціологія. Право, 4(60), 27-31. doi.org/10.20535/2308-5053.2023.4(60).296974/
2. Іванюта, С. П., & Якушенко, Л. М. (2022). Європейський зелений курс і кліматична політика України: аналітична доповідь. Київ: Національний інститут стратегічних досліджень. 95 с. doi.org/10.53679/NISS-analytrep.2022.12/
3. Кицюк, І.В., Науменко, Н.С., & Присяжнюк, В.В. (2023). Європейський зелений курс: можливості та наслідки для українського бізнесу. Економіка та суспільс-тво, (56). doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2023-56-87/
4. Суходоля, О. (2022). Європейський план подолання залежності від російських енергоносіїв. Київ: Національний інститут стратегічних досліджень. niss.gov.ua/doslidzhennya/natsionalna-bezpeka/yevropeyskyy-plan-podolannya-zalezhnosti-vid-rosiyskykh/
5. Тодоров, І., & Тодорова, Н. (2025). Перші 100 днів другої каденції Трампа: зовнішня політика США та динаміка російсько-української війни. Геополітика України: історія і сучасність, 1(34), 21-32. doi.org/10.24144/2078-1431.2025.1(34)/
6. Berker, L. E. (2024, October). Turn to the right, turn away from the green? – A nuanced analysis on how a populist radical right party affects environmental policy making in Sweden. Review of Policy Research, 1-24. doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12631/
7. Berry, A. (2025, August 23). German welfare state 'can no longer be financed'. – Merz. Deutsche Welle. www.dw.com/en/german-welfare-state-can-no-longer-be-financed-merz/a-73742270/
8. Bocquillon, P. (2024). Climate and Energy Transitions in Times of Environmental Backlash? The European Union ‘Green Deal’ From Adoption to Implementation. Journal of Common Market Studies, 62(S1), 124–134. doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13675/
9. Böcher, M., Zeigermann, U., Berker, L. E., & Jabra, D. (2022). Climate policy expertise in times of populism – knowledge strategies of the AfD regarding Germany’s climate package. Environmental Politics, 31(5), 820–840. doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2022.2090537/
10. Böcher, M. (2023). Emergence and Development of the Environmental Policy Field. In H. Jörgens, C. Knill & Y. Steinebach (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of Environmental Policy (pp. 15–27). Routledge, London a. New York. doi.org/10.4324/9781003043843-3
11. Brendler, V., & Pollex, J. (2025). Contested Transitions: Policy Instruments as Sites of Conflict in Europe’s Green Transition. dms - der moderne staat, 18(1), 3-16. doi.org/10.3224/dms.v18i1.01/
12. Bublyk, Y., Shapoval, Y., Brus, S., & Diachuk, O. (2025). Ukraine country report for Output IV: Green finance in the agricultural sector of Ukraine: PROGRESS stocktaking for the country framework on financing climate change adaptation and resilience in the Agricultural. Kyiv: Institute for Economics and Forecasting of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. 63 pp.
13. Carter, N. (2018). The Politics of the Environment: Ideas, Activism, Policy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 436 pp. doi.org/10.1017/9781108642163
14. Cockburn, P. (2025, June 7). Trumpism is a greater danger to Europe than Putin. The i Paper. inews.co.uk/opinion/trumpism-is-a-greater-danger-to-europe-than-putin-3735725
15. Colgan, J. D., Green, J. F., & Hale, T. N. (2021). Asset Revaluation and the Existential Politics of Climate Change. International Organization, 75(Special Issue 2), 586–610. doi.org/10.1017/S0020818320000296/
16. Crulli, M., & Emanuele, V. (2025, April). Bringing Rokkan into the twenty-first century: the cleavage structure of Western Europe. Journal of European Public Policy, 1–30. doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2025.2486080/
17. Dupont, C., Moore, B., Boasson, E. L., Gravey, V., Jordan, A., Kivimaa, P., Kulovesi, K., Kuzemko, C., Oberthür, S., Panchuk, D., Rosamond, J., Torney, D., Tosun, J., & Von Homeyer, I. (2024). Three decades of climate policy: Racing toward climate neutrality? WIREs Climate Change, 15(1). doi.org/10.1002/wcc.863/
18. Forchtner, B. (2019). Climate Change and the Far Right. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 10(5), e604. doi.org/10.1002/wcc.604/
19. Gerstenberg, Anne, & Schnapp, K.-U. (2025). Instruments as belief-driven entities: Reconceptualizing the interplay of beliefs and policy instruments. der moderne staat, 18(1), 35–51. doi.org/10.3224/dms.v18i1.03/
20. Gerstenberg, A., & Schnapp, K.-U. (2025). The politics of climate policy instruments: Investigating policymakers’ belief systems in EU climate policymaking. der moderne staat, 18(1), 52–72. doi.org/10.3224/dms.v18i1.04/
21. Graham, D. A. (2025, August 25). Trump's Right-Wing Socialism. The Atlantic. www.theatlantic.com/newsletters/archive/2025/08/trump-big-government-socialism/684003/
22. Green-Pedersen, C., & Little, C. (2023). Understanding the Conflict of Conflicts: Is Left-Right Conflict a Necessary Condition for the Development of New Politics? Political Studies, 72(2). doi.org/10.1177/00323217221141424/
23. Haskett, J. D. (2025, April 14). U.S. Withdrawal from the Paris Agreement: Process and Potential Effects. Congressional Research Service. www.congress.gov/crs-product/R48504/
24. Havercroft J, Wiener A, Kumm M, & Dunoff J. L. (2018). Editorial: Donald Trump as global constitutional breaching experiment. Global Constitutionalism, 7(1), 1-13. doi.org/10.1017/S2045381718000035
25. Hiltz, J. P., & Levit, G. (2012, October 15). The Biosphere and Noosphere: Vladimir Vernadsky and Teilhard de Chardin. Forum SynergieWissen ZfL Berlin. www.zflprojekte.de/synergie/doku.php?id=features:noosphaere/
26. Hultman, M., Björk, A., & Viinikka, T. (2020). The Far Right and Climate Change Denial: Denouncing Environmental Challenges Via Anti-Establishment Rhetoric, Marketing of Doubts, Industrial/Breadwinner Masculinities Enactments and Ethno-Nationalism. In B. Forchtner (Ed.), The Far Right and the Environment. Politics, Discourse and Communication (pp. 121-35). Routledge, London a. New York. doi.org/10.4324/9781351104043-8
27. Hupke, K.-D. (2020). Naturschutz. Eine Kritische Einführung. Springer Spektrum, Berlin & Heidelberg. 10.1007/978-3-662-62132-5
28. Inglehart, R., & Baker, W. E. (2000). Modernization, Cultural Change, and the Persistence of Traditional Values. American Sociological Review. 65(1), 19-51. doi.org/10.1177/000312240006500103
29. Isaac, J. C. Making America Great Again? (2017). Perspectives on Politics, 15(3), 625-631. doi.org/10.1017/S1537592717000871/
30. Johnson, K., & Lu, C. (2025, July 16). Trump Embraces State Capitalism. Foreign Policy. foreignpolicy.com/2025/07/16/trump-economy-industry-state-capitalism-steel-rare-earth-investment/
31. Kafka, K.I., & Kostis, P. C. (2021, December). Post-materialism and economic growth: Cultural backlash, 1981–2019. Journal of Comparative Economics, 49(4), 901-917. doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2021.04.001/
32. Kallis, G., Mastini, R., & Zografos, C. (2023, November). Perceptions of degrowth in the European Parliament. Preprint. ResearchGate. (23 pp.) doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.25370.21448/
33. Krastev, I., & Leonard, M. (2025, June). Trump’s European Revolution. European Council on Foreign Relations. 25 pp. ecfr.eu/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Trumps-European-revolution-v1.pdf/
34. Küppers, A. (2024). ‘Climate-Soviets,’ ‘Alarmism,’ and ‘Eco-Dictatorship’: The Framing of Climate Change Scepticism by the Populist Radical Right Alternative for Germany. German Politics, 33(1), 1–21. doi.org/10.1080/09644008.2022.2056596
35. Kurella, A.S., & Rapp, M. (2025, February). Unfolding GAL-TAN: the multi-dimensional nature of public opinion in Western Europe. West European Politics, 1–26. doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2025.2466117/
36. Kurmayer, N.J. (2025, September 15). Berlin scales back electrification target over slow pace of switch from fossil fuels. Euractive. www.euractiv.com/news/berlin-scales-back-electrification-target-over-slow-pace-of-switch-from-fossil-fuels/
37. Lenschow, A. (2021). Studying EU Environmental Policy. In A. Jordan & V. Gravey (Eds.), Environmental Policy in the European Union. Actors, Institutions and Processes (pp. 51-71). Routledge, London. doi.org/10.4324/9780429402333-5
38. Liefferink, D., & Wurzel, R. (2017). Environmental Leaders and Pioneers: Agents of Change? Journal of European Public Policy, 24(7), 951–68. doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2016.1161657/
39. Little, A. (2025, March 26). Trump has blown up the world order – and left Europe's leaders scrabbling. BBC. www.bbc.com/news/articles/c2er9j83x0zo/
40. Lockwood, M. (2018). Right-Wing Populism and the Climate Change Agenda: Exploring the Linkages. Environmental Politics. 27(4), 712-32. doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2018.1458411/
41. Lowndes, J. (2019). Populism and race in the United States from George Wallace to Donald Trump. In C. de la Torre (Ed.), Routledge Handbook of Global Populism (pp. 190-200). Routledge, London a. New York. doi.org/10.4324/9781315226446-15
42. Mathiesen, K., Camut, N., Weise, Z., Cooper, C., & Guillot, L. (2024). Bears, cars and angry farmers fuel green backlash. Politico. www.politico.eu/article/bears-cars-angryfarmers-fuel-green-deal-backlash-eu-agenda-european-commission-ursula-von-der-leyen/#germany/
43. Marquardt, J., & Lederer, M. (2022). Politicizing climate change in times of populism: An introduction. Environmental Politics, 31(5), 735–754. doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2022.2083478/
44. McLaughlin, A. (1993). Regarding Nature: Industrialism and Deep Ecology. SUNY Press, Albany.
45. McLaughlin, A. (1995). The Heart of Deep Ecology. In G. Sessions (Ed.), Deep Ecology for the Twenty-First Century (pp. 85-93). Shambhala, Boston a. London.
46. Naess, A. (1973). The shallow and the deep, long‐range ecology movement. A summary. Inquiry. An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, 16(1–4), 95–100. doi.org/10.1080/00201747308601682/
47. Naess, A. (2005). Can Violence Lead to Nonviolence? Gandhi's Point of View. In A. Drengson (Ed.). The Selected Works of Arne Naess (pp. 2091-2104). Springer-Verlag. doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-4519-
48. Odmalm, P., & Rydgren, J. (2019). Introduction: Comparing and Reconceptualising the (Populist) Radical Right. European Political Science, (18), 373-78. doi.org/10.1057/s41304-018-0158-7
49. Plotnikov, O. (2023). The General Situation with Climate Change in the World and Risk Assessment for the Global Economy. In T. C. Devezas, J. C. C. Leitão, Y. Yegorov, D. Chistilin (Eds.), Global Challenges of Climate Change (pp. 31-47). Springer, Cham. doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16477-4_3
50. Plotnikov, O. (2025). The Influence of the Fragmentation of the World Economy on the Post-War Reconstruction of Ukraine. In J. Carrillo-Pina & O. Sharov (Eds.). The Geoeconomics of the International Monetary Order: Money and Power in the 21st Century (pp. 71-91). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-90851-4_4
51. Pollex, J. (2025). Is it all about distribution? – Debating the Green Deal in the European Parliament. Journal of European Integration, 47(2), 217–236. doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2025.2459874
52. Posaner, J. (2025, September 13). Manfred Weber 'promises' to reverse EU's combustion engine ban. Euractive. www.euractiv.com/news/manfred-weber-promises-to-reverse-eus-combustion-engine-ban/
53. Rankin, J. (2019, December 13). European Green Deal to press ahead despite Polish targets opt-out. The Guardian. www.theguardian.com/environment/2019/dec/13/european-green-deal-to-press-ahead-despite-polish-targets-opt-out
54. Rosenhall, L., & Friedman, L. (2025, June 12). Trump Blocks California E.V. Rules in Latest Move to Rein In the State. The New York Times. www.nytimes.com/2025/06/12/us/california-trump-electric-vehicle-waiver.html
55. Rovny, J., & Edwards, E. E. (2012). Struggle over Dimensionality: Party Competition in Western and Eastern Europe. East European Politics and Societies, 26(1), 56-74. doi.org/10.1177/0888325410387635
56. Schunz, S. (2022). The ‘European Green Deal’ – a paradigm shift? Transformations in the European Union’s sustainability meta-discourse. Political Research Exchange, 4(1), 23 pp. doi.org/10.1080/2474736X.2022.2085121
57. Sultani, H. (2025, February). The reinforcement of European 'Trumpism' – on the verge of a 'new' Europe. Baku: AIR Center – Center of Analysis of International Relations. 8 pp. www.academia.edu/128018025/The_reinforcement_of_European_Trumpism_on_the_verge_of_a_new_Europe?auto=download
58. Sutton, S., & Guida, V. (2025, August 22). Trump is turning the government into an investment firm. Politico. www.politico.com/newsletters/morning-money-capital-risk/2025/08/22/trump-is-turning-the-government-into-an-investment-firm-00519364
59. Throsby, D. (2001) Economics and Culture. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 228 pp.
60. Töller, A. E. (2022). Machen Parteien in der Umweltpolitik einen Unterschied? Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft, 15(4), 447-76. doi.org/10.1007/s12286-021-00501-9
61. Vernadsky, V. I. (2005, Spring [1945, January]). Some Words About the Noösphere. 21st Century. Pp. 16-21. 21sci-tech.com/translations/The_Noosphere.pdf
62. Vihma, A., Reischl, G., & Andersen, A. N. (2021). A Climate Backlash: Comparing Populist Parties’ Climate Policies in Denmark, Finland, and Sweden. The Journal of Environment & Development, 30(3), 219–39. doi.org/10.1177/10704965211027748
63. von Homeyer, I., Oberthür, S., & Dupont, C. (2022). Implementing the European Green Deal during the Evolving Energy Crisis. Journal of Common Market Studies, 60(S1), 125–136. doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13397
64. Wendler, F. (2023). The European Green Deal Agenda After the Attack on Ukraine: Exogenous Shock Meets Policy‐Making Stability. Politics and Governance, 11(4), 352–364. doi.org/10.17645/pag.v11i4.7343
2. Іванюта, С. П., & Якушенко, Л. М. (2022). Європейський зелений курс і кліматична політика України: аналітична доповідь. Київ: Національний інститут стратегічних досліджень. 95 с. doi.org/10.53679/NISS-analytrep.2022.12/
3. Кицюк, І.В., Науменко, Н.С., & Присяжнюк, В.В. (2023). Європейський зелений курс: можливості та наслідки для українського бізнесу. Економіка та суспільс-тво, (56). doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2023-56-87/
4. Суходоля, О. (2022). Європейський план подолання залежності від російських енергоносіїв. Київ: Національний інститут стратегічних досліджень. niss.gov.ua/doslidzhennya/natsionalna-bezpeka/yevropeyskyy-plan-podolannya-zalezhnosti-vid-rosiyskykh/
5. Тодоров, І., & Тодорова, Н. (2025). Перші 100 днів другої каденції Трампа: зовнішня політика США та динаміка російсько-української війни. Геополітика України: історія і сучасність, 1(34), 21-32. doi.org/10.24144/2078-1431.2025.1(34)/
6. Berker, L. E. (2024, October). Turn to the right, turn away from the green? – A nuanced analysis on how a populist radical right party affects environmental policy making in Sweden. Review of Policy Research, 1-24. doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12631/
7. Berry, A. (2025, August 23). German welfare state 'can no longer be financed'. – Merz. Deutsche Welle. www.dw.com/en/german-welfare-state-can-no-longer-be-financed-merz/a-73742270/
8. Bocquillon, P. (2024). Climate and Energy Transitions in Times of Environmental Backlash? The European Union ‘Green Deal’ From Adoption to Implementation. Journal of Common Market Studies, 62(S1), 124–134. doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13675/
9. Böcher, M., Zeigermann, U., Berker, L. E., & Jabra, D. (2022). Climate policy expertise in times of populism – knowledge strategies of the AfD regarding Germany’s climate package. Environmental Politics, 31(5), 820–840. doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2022.2090537/
10. Böcher, M. (2023). Emergence and Development of the Environmental Policy Field. In H. Jörgens, C. Knill & Y. Steinebach (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of Environmental Policy (pp. 15–27). Routledge, London a. New York. doi.org/10.4324/9781003043843-3
11. Brendler, V., & Pollex, J. (2025). Contested Transitions: Policy Instruments as Sites of Conflict in Europe’s Green Transition. dms - der moderne staat, 18(1), 3-16. doi.org/10.3224/dms.v18i1.01/
12. Bublyk, Y., Shapoval, Y., Brus, S., & Diachuk, O. (2025). Ukraine country report for Output IV: Green finance in the agricultural sector of Ukraine: PROGRESS stocktaking for the country framework on financing climate change adaptation and resilience in the Agricultural. Kyiv: Institute for Economics and Forecasting of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. 63 pp.
13. Carter, N. (2018). The Politics of the Environment: Ideas, Activism, Policy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 436 pp. doi.org/10.1017/9781108642163
14. Cockburn, P. (2025, June 7). Trumpism is a greater danger to Europe than Putin. The i Paper. inews.co.uk/opinion/trumpism-is-a-greater-danger-to-europe-than-putin-3735725
15. Colgan, J. D., Green, J. F., & Hale, T. N. (2021). Asset Revaluation and the Existential Politics of Climate Change. International Organization, 75(Special Issue 2), 586–610. doi.org/10.1017/S0020818320000296/
16. Crulli, M., & Emanuele, V. (2025, April). Bringing Rokkan into the twenty-first century: the cleavage structure of Western Europe. Journal of European Public Policy, 1–30. doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2025.2486080/
17. Dupont, C., Moore, B., Boasson, E. L., Gravey, V., Jordan, A., Kivimaa, P., Kulovesi, K., Kuzemko, C., Oberthür, S., Panchuk, D., Rosamond, J., Torney, D., Tosun, J., & Von Homeyer, I. (2024). Three decades of climate policy: Racing toward climate neutrality? WIREs Climate Change, 15(1). doi.org/10.1002/wcc.863/
18. Forchtner, B. (2019). Climate Change and the Far Right. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 10(5), e604. doi.org/10.1002/wcc.604/
19. Gerstenberg, Anne, & Schnapp, K.-U. (2025). Instruments as belief-driven entities: Reconceptualizing the interplay of beliefs and policy instruments. der moderne staat, 18(1), 35–51. doi.org/10.3224/dms.v18i1.03/
20. Gerstenberg, A., & Schnapp, K.-U. (2025). The politics of climate policy instruments: Investigating policymakers’ belief systems in EU climate policymaking. der moderne staat, 18(1), 52–72. doi.org/10.3224/dms.v18i1.04/
21. Graham, D. A. (2025, August 25). Trump's Right-Wing Socialism. The Atlantic. www.theatlantic.com/newsletters/archive/2025/08/trump-big-government-socialism/684003/
22. Green-Pedersen, C., & Little, C. (2023). Understanding the Conflict of Conflicts: Is Left-Right Conflict a Necessary Condition for the Development of New Politics? Political Studies, 72(2). doi.org/10.1177/00323217221141424/
23. Haskett, J. D. (2025, April 14). U.S. Withdrawal from the Paris Agreement: Process and Potential Effects. Congressional Research Service. www.congress.gov/crs-product/R48504/
24. Havercroft J, Wiener A, Kumm M, & Dunoff J. L. (2018). Editorial: Donald Trump as global constitutional breaching experiment. Global Constitutionalism, 7(1), 1-13. doi.org/10.1017/S2045381718000035
25. Hiltz, J. P., & Levit, G. (2012, October 15). The Biosphere and Noosphere: Vladimir Vernadsky and Teilhard de Chardin. Forum SynergieWissen ZfL Berlin. www.zflprojekte.de/synergie/doku.php?id=features:noosphaere/
26. Hultman, M., Björk, A., & Viinikka, T. (2020). The Far Right and Climate Change Denial: Denouncing Environmental Challenges Via Anti-Establishment Rhetoric, Marketing of Doubts, Industrial/Breadwinner Masculinities Enactments and Ethno-Nationalism. In B. Forchtner (Ed.), The Far Right and the Environment. Politics, Discourse and Communication (pp. 121-35). Routledge, London a. New York. doi.org/10.4324/9781351104043-8
27. Hupke, K.-D. (2020). Naturschutz. Eine Kritische Einführung. Springer Spektrum, Berlin & Heidelberg. 10.1007/978-3-662-62132-5
28. Inglehart, R., & Baker, W. E. (2000). Modernization, Cultural Change, and the Persistence of Traditional Values. American Sociological Review. 65(1), 19-51. doi.org/10.1177/000312240006500103
29. Isaac, J. C. Making America Great Again? (2017). Perspectives on Politics, 15(3), 625-631. doi.org/10.1017/S1537592717000871/
30. Johnson, K., & Lu, C. (2025, July 16). Trump Embraces State Capitalism. Foreign Policy. foreignpolicy.com/2025/07/16/trump-economy-industry-state-capitalism-steel-rare-earth-investment/
31. Kafka, K.I., & Kostis, P. C. (2021, December). Post-materialism and economic growth: Cultural backlash, 1981–2019. Journal of Comparative Economics, 49(4), 901-917. doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2021.04.001/
32. Kallis, G., Mastini, R., & Zografos, C. (2023, November). Perceptions of degrowth in the European Parliament. Preprint. ResearchGate. (23 pp.) doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.25370.21448/
33. Krastev, I., & Leonard, M. (2025, June). Trump’s European Revolution. European Council on Foreign Relations. 25 pp. ecfr.eu/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Trumps-European-revolution-v1.pdf/
34. Küppers, A. (2024). ‘Climate-Soviets,’ ‘Alarmism,’ and ‘Eco-Dictatorship’: The Framing of Climate Change Scepticism by the Populist Radical Right Alternative for Germany. German Politics, 33(1), 1–21. doi.org/10.1080/09644008.2022.2056596
35. Kurella, A.S., & Rapp, M. (2025, February). Unfolding GAL-TAN: the multi-dimensional nature of public opinion in Western Europe. West European Politics, 1–26. doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2025.2466117/
36. Kurmayer, N.J. (2025, September 15). Berlin scales back electrification target over slow pace of switch from fossil fuels. Euractive. www.euractiv.com/news/berlin-scales-back-electrification-target-over-slow-pace-of-switch-from-fossil-fuels/
37. Lenschow, A. (2021). Studying EU Environmental Policy. In A. Jordan & V. Gravey (Eds.), Environmental Policy in the European Union. Actors, Institutions and Processes (pp. 51-71). Routledge, London. doi.org/10.4324/9780429402333-5
38. Liefferink, D., & Wurzel, R. (2017). Environmental Leaders and Pioneers: Agents of Change? Journal of European Public Policy, 24(7), 951–68. doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2016.1161657/
39. Little, A. (2025, March 26). Trump has blown up the world order – and left Europe's leaders scrabbling. BBC. www.bbc.com/news/articles/c2er9j83x0zo/
40. Lockwood, M. (2018). Right-Wing Populism and the Climate Change Agenda: Exploring the Linkages. Environmental Politics. 27(4), 712-32. doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2018.1458411/
41. Lowndes, J. (2019). Populism and race in the United States from George Wallace to Donald Trump. In C. de la Torre (Ed.), Routledge Handbook of Global Populism (pp. 190-200). Routledge, London a. New York. doi.org/10.4324/9781315226446-15
42. Mathiesen, K., Camut, N., Weise, Z., Cooper, C., & Guillot, L. (2024). Bears, cars and angry farmers fuel green backlash. Politico. www.politico.eu/article/bears-cars-angryfarmers-fuel-green-deal-backlash-eu-agenda-european-commission-ursula-von-der-leyen/#germany/
43. Marquardt, J., & Lederer, M. (2022). Politicizing climate change in times of populism: An introduction. Environmental Politics, 31(5), 735–754. doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2022.2083478/
44. McLaughlin, A. (1993). Regarding Nature: Industrialism and Deep Ecology. SUNY Press, Albany.
45. McLaughlin, A. (1995). The Heart of Deep Ecology. In G. Sessions (Ed.), Deep Ecology for the Twenty-First Century (pp. 85-93). Shambhala, Boston a. London.
46. Naess, A. (1973). The shallow and the deep, long‐range ecology movement. A summary. Inquiry. An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, 16(1–4), 95–100. doi.org/10.1080/00201747308601682/
47. Naess, A. (2005). Can Violence Lead to Nonviolence? Gandhi's Point of View. In A. Drengson (Ed.). The Selected Works of Arne Naess (pp. 2091-2104). Springer-Verlag. doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-4519-
48. Odmalm, P., & Rydgren, J. (2019). Introduction: Comparing and Reconceptualising the (Populist) Radical Right. European Political Science, (18), 373-78. doi.org/10.1057/s41304-018-0158-7
49. Plotnikov, O. (2023). The General Situation with Climate Change in the World and Risk Assessment for the Global Economy. In T. C. Devezas, J. C. C. Leitão, Y. Yegorov, D. Chistilin (Eds.), Global Challenges of Climate Change (pp. 31-47). Springer, Cham. doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16477-4_3
50. Plotnikov, O. (2025). The Influence of the Fragmentation of the World Economy on the Post-War Reconstruction of Ukraine. In J. Carrillo-Pina & O. Sharov (Eds.). The Geoeconomics of the International Monetary Order: Money and Power in the 21st Century (pp. 71-91). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-90851-4_4
51. Pollex, J. (2025). Is it all about distribution? – Debating the Green Deal in the European Parliament. Journal of European Integration, 47(2), 217–236. doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2025.2459874
52. Posaner, J. (2025, September 13). Manfred Weber 'promises' to reverse EU's combustion engine ban. Euractive. www.euractiv.com/news/manfred-weber-promises-to-reverse-eus-combustion-engine-ban/
53. Rankin, J. (2019, December 13). European Green Deal to press ahead despite Polish targets opt-out. The Guardian. www.theguardian.com/environment/2019/dec/13/european-green-deal-to-press-ahead-despite-polish-targets-opt-out
54. Rosenhall, L., & Friedman, L. (2025, June 12). Trump Blocks California E.V. Rules in Latest Move to Rein In the State. The New York Times. www.nytimes.com/2025/06/12/us/california-trump-electric-vehicle-waiver.html
55. Rovny, J., & Edwards, E. E. (2012). Struggle over Dimensionality: Party Competition in Western and Eastern Europe. East European Politics and Societies, 26(1), 56-74. doi.org/10.1177/0888325410387635
56. Schunz, S. (2022). The ‘European Green Deal’ – a paradigm shift? Transformations in the European Union’s sustainability meta-discourse. Political Research Exchange, 4(1), 23 pp. doi.org/10.1080/2474736X.2022.2085121
57. Sultani, H. (2025, February). The reinforcement of European 'Trumpism' – on the verge of a 'new' Europe. Baku: AIR Center – Center of Analysis of International Relations. 8 pp. www.academia.edu/128018025/The_reinforcement_of_European_Trumpism_on_the_verge_of_a_new_Europe?auto=download
58. Sutton, S., & Guida, V. (2025, August 22). Trump is turning the government into an investment firm. Politico. www.politico.com/newsletters/morning-money-capital-risk/2025/08/22/trump-is-turning-the-government-into-an-investment-firm-00519364
59. Throsby, D. (2001) Economics and Culture. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 228 pp.
60. Töller, A. E. (2022). Machen Parteien in der Umweltpolitik einen Unterschied? Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft, 15(4), 447-76. doi.org/10.1007/s12286-021-00501-9
61. Vernadsky, V. I. (2005, Spring [1945, January]). Some Words About the Noösphere. 21st Century. Pp. 16-21. 21sci-tech.com/translations/The_Noosphere.pdf
62. Vihma, A., Reischl, G., & Andersen, A. N. (2021). A Climate Backlash: Comparing Populist Parties’ Climate Policies in Denmark, Finland, and Sweden. The Journal of Environment & Development, 30(3), 219–39. doi.org/10.1177/10704965211027748
63. von Homeyer, I., Oberthür, S., & Dupont, C. (2022). Implementing the European Green Deal during the Evolving Energy Crisis. Journal of Common Market Studies, 60(S1), 125–136. doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13397
64. Wendler, F. (2023). The European Green Deal Agenda After the Attack on Ukraine: Exogenous Shock Meets Policy‐Making Stability. Politics and Governance, 11(4), 352–364. doi.org/10.17645/pag.v11i4.7343
Календар подій
| П | В | С | Ч | П | С | Н |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | ||||
| 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
| 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 |
| 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 |
| 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |
© Institute for economics and forecasting 2026. All rights reserved
