| . |
English
Ukrainian
|
| HOME |
№ 2026/2
1Dragomanov Ukrainian State University
THEORETICAL AND METHODOLOGICAL FOUNDATIONS FOR JUSTIFYING IRRATIONAL CONSUMER BEHAVIOR IN MODERN CONDITIONS
| Ekon. teor. 2026; 2:69-88 | https://doi.org/10.15407/etet2026.02.069 |
ABSTRACT ▼
In contemporary society, characterized by digitalization, globalization, and economic instability, classical approaches to analyzing rational consumer choice are becoming increasingly less effective. The research addresses the limitations of classical economic theory in explaining consumer behavior shaped by emotional states, social factors, and information overload.
The purpose of the article is a theoretical and methodological justification of irrational consumer behavior in modern conditions based on the phased development of a system of axioms, theorems, models of irrational consumer behavior and the determination of their theoretical and practical significance.
The proposed theoretical and methodological approach explains and models irrational consumer behavior by considering social, psychological, economic, and technological factors. The author analyzes the specifics of consumer decision-making in situations where classical principles of rationality fail and proposes a system of axioms, theorems, and models to address these behaviors.
The study employs methods of axiomatic analysis, behavioral modeling, and synthesis of existing theoretical concepts. Empirical approaches, such as consumer behavior data analysis, experimental studies, and cognitive modeling methods, are also utilized to determine the impact of emotions, social trends, and cognitive biases.
The main scientific results include: 1. The development of a system of axioms reflecting the key characteristics of irrational consumer behavior. 2. The formulation of theorems explaining the influence of emotional states, cognitive distortions, and social context on decision-making. 3. The proposal of an axiomatic basis for modeling irrational behavior, which can be integrated into modern economic models. 4. The identification of factors that most significantly influence consumer decisions, including the impact of the digital environment, information overload, and manipulative marketing practices.
The theoretical significance of the work lies in expanding the existing economic models by integrating psychological and social factors, enabling a more accurate description and prediction of real-world consumer behavior under contemporary conditions. The practical significance is reflected in the development of recommendations for businesses (particularly in marketing), financial management, and public policy. The proposed results can be used to stimulate savings, manage demand effectively, and reduce the negative impact of manipulative practices on consumers.
Thus, the content of the article establishes a theoretical and methodological framework for studying irrational consumer behavior, which is critical for developing strategies in business, economics, and society.
Keywords:consumer, consumer behavior theory, consumer behavior research methodology, irrational consumer behavior, axiomatic approach, consumer behavior theorems and models
JEL: D010, D910
| Article in Ukrainian (pp. 69 - 88) | Download | Downloads :62 |
REFERENCES ▼
2. Vatamaniuk, O. Z. (2018). Rationality of human behavior in economics: The concept of bounded rationality. Ekonomichna teoriya ta pravo – Economic Theory and Law, 3(34), 11-25. htpps//doi.org/10.31359/2411-5584-2018-34-3-11 [in Ukrainian].
3. Horbachuk, V. M., Syrku, A. A., & Suleimanov, S.-B. (2017). Irrationality and rationality in decision-making. Ekonomichnyi visnyk Zaporizkoi derzhavnoi inzhenernoi akademii – Economic Bulletin of Zaporizhzhia State Engineering Academy, 2(08), part 2, 132–136. [in Ukrainian].
4. Grytsenko A. A. (Ed.). (2013). Hierarchy and Networks in the Institutional Architectonics of Economic Systems. National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, SO "Institute for Economics and Forecasting of the NAS of Ukraine", ief.org.ua/en/publication/monohrafii/2013/ierarkhija-ta-merezhi-v-instytuciyniy-arkhitektonici-ekonomichnykh-system [in Russian].
5. Dlugopolskiy, O. V. & Ivashuk, Yu. P. (2014). Experimental and behavioral econom-ics: From Vernon Smith to Daniel Kahneman. Visnyk Ternopilskoho natsionalnoho ekonomichnoho universytetu – Bulletin of Ternopil National Economic University, (1), 180–193 [in Ukrainian].
6. Ilyashenko, P. (2017). Behavioral finance: Household investments and decision-making regarding loans. Visnyk Natsionalnoho banku Ukrainy – Visnyk of the National Bank of Ukraine, (242), 31–52. doi.org/10.26531/vnbu2017.242.015 [in Ukrainian].
7. Krykun, V. A. (2017). The theory of behavioral economics in the study of the Ukrainian banking market during the years of independence. Naukovyi visnyk Mizhnarodnoho hu-manitarnoho universytetu. Seriya: Ekonomika i menedzhment – Scientific Bulletin of the International Humanitarian University. Series: Economics and Management, 24(1), 18–22 [in Ukraini-an].
8. Maksymenko, S. D., & Pasichnyk, I. D. (2013). On the issue of methodology of cognitive psychology. Naukovi zapysky Natsionalnoho universytetu "Ostrozka akademiia". Psykholohiya i pedahohika Seria – Scientific Notes of Ostroh Academy National University. Psy-chology and Pedagogy Series, (24), 3–6 [in Ukrainian].
9. Naumova, M., & Naumova, O. (2023). Consumer behavior in the global dimension. Naukovyi visnyk Poltavskoho universytetu ekonomiky i torhivli. Seriya: Ekonomichni nauky – Scientific Bulletin of Poltava University of Economics and Trade. Series: Economic Sciences, 1(107), 70–74. doi.org/10.37734/2409-6873-2023-1-10 [in Ukrainian].
10. Patytska, Kh. O. (2021). Behavioral patterns of economic decision-making at the local level: theoretical foundations. Biznes Inform – Business Inform, (1), 6–13. doi.org/10.32983/2222-4459-2021-1-6-13 [in Ukrainian].
11. Savchenko, O. V. (2014). Cognitive resources as an important component of individual experience at the cognitive level. Psykholohichni perspektyvy – Psychological Perspectives, (24), 283–296. [in Ukrainian].
12. Antonides, G. (2017). Sustainable consumer behavior: A collection of empirical studies. Sustainability, 9(10). doi.org/10.3390/su9101686
13. Bradford, D., Courtemanche, C., Heutel, G., McAlvanah, P., & Ruhm, C. (2017). Time preferences and consumer behavior. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 55(2–3), 119–145. doi.org/10.1007/s11166-018-9272-8/
14. Cialdini, R. (1984). Influence. The Psychology of Persuasion. William Morrow & Company.
15. Cialdini, R. B., & Goldstein, N. J. (2004). Social influence: Compliance and conformity. Annual Review of Psychology, (55), 591–621. doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142015/
16. Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford University Press. doi.org/10.1515/9781503620766
17. Hyken, S. (2018). The convenience revolution: How to deliver a customer service experience that disrupts the competition and creates fierce loyalty. Sound Wisdom.
18. Iyengar, S. (2010). The Art of Choosing. Twelve.
19. Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
20. Kahneman, D., Diener, E., & Schwarz, N. (Eds.). (1999). Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology. Russell Sage Foundation.
21. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–291. doi.org/10.2307/1914185
22. Kotler, P., & Armstrong, G. (2015). Principles of marketing. (Global Edition). Pearson.
23. Kotler P., Kartajaya H., & Setiawan I. (2017). Marketing 4.0: Moving from Traditional to Digital. John Wiley & Sons.
24. Laibson, D. (1997). Golden eggs and hyperbolic discounting. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(2), 443–478. doi.org/10.1162/003355397555253/
25. Lamberton, C., & Stephen, A. T. (2016). A thematic exploration of digital, social media, and mobile marketing: Research evolution from 2000 to 2015 and an agenda for future inquiry. Journal of Marketing, 80(6), 146–172. doi.org/10.1509/jm.15.0415/
26. Lerner, J. S., Li, Y., Valdesolo, P., & Kassam, K. S. (2015). Emotion and decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, (66), 799–823. doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115043
27. Loewenstein, G. (2000). Emotions in Economic Theory and Economic Behavior. The American Economic Review, 90(2), 426–432. doi.org/10.1257/aer.90.2.426
28. Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63(2), 81–97. doi.org/10.1037/h0043158
29. Rana, N. P., Slade, E. L., Sahu, G. P., Kizgin, H., Singh, N., Dey, B., Gutierrez, A., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (Eds.). (2020). Digital and social media marketing: Emerging applications and theoretical development. Springer. doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24374-6
30. Schwartz, B. (2004). The paradox of choice: Why more is less. Ecco.
31. Simon, H. A. (1957). Models of man, social and rational: Mathematical essays on rational human behavior in society setting. Wiley.
32. Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. Yale University Press.
33. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1991). Loss aversion in riskless choice: A reference-dependent model. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, (106), 1039-1061. doi.org/10.2307/2937956
34. Veblen, T. (1899). Mr. Cummings’s strictures on “The Theory of the Leisure Class”. Journal of Political Economy, 8(1), 106–117. www.jstor.org/stable/1817602/
Сalendar of events
| M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
| 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 |
| 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | ||
