.
Увійти 
|
HOME |
№ 1/2015
GRYTSENKO Andrii Andriyovych1, PODLIESNA Vasylyna H.2
1Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine
2Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine
Topic 27. Socio-economic cycles: historical forms and state regulation
Ekon. teor. 2015; 1:89-99 |
ABSTRACT ▼
Keywords:
JEL:
Article in Russian (pp. 89 - 99) | Download | Downloads :136 |
Article in Ukrainian (pp. 89 - 99) | Download | Downloads :133 |
REFERENCES ▼
№ 4/2016
1Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine
Reconstructive economic development: contents, guidelines and the vector of social justice
Ekon. teor. 2016; 4:5-18 | https://doi.org/10.15407/etet2016.04.005 |
ABSTRACT ▼
The article reveals the contents of the reconstructive type of economic development as a unity of introverted, inclusive and innovative development, aimed at resolving the internal domestic problems of the country by means of a radical restructuring of the economy, changing its supporting structures and engaging its internal potential in a reflexive interaction with the environment for the welfare of citizens and social justice. The author defines the identity and difference between modernization and reconstruction of the economy, and justifies the need to consider the relationship between qualitative and quantitative characteristics of economic reforms, and the possibility of destructive growth and growth without development. It is shown that the reconstructive development is possible both on the basis of economic growth, and under certain conditions with zero or even negative economic growth. It is proved that the reconstructive development is essentially a socially-oriented phenomenon. The author proposes to use the laws of architectonics to evaluate the justice of economic development and formulates the guidelines of reconstructive development.
Keywords:reconstructive economic development, economic growth, introverted development, inclu-sive development, laws of architectonics, social justice.
JEL: O100
Article in Russian (pp. 5 - 18) | Download | Downloads :649 |
Article in Ukrainian (pp. 5 - 18) | Download | Downloads :537 |
REFERENCES ▼
2. Hegel, G. (1970). Science of logic. Vol. 1. Moscow: Mysl’ [in Russian].
3. Hegel, G. (1974). Encyclopedia of Philosophy.Vol. 1. Nauka logiki. Moscow: Mysl’ [in Russian].
4. Hrytsenko, A. (2014). Institutional economics: the subject, methodology, content. Saabrucken. Deutschland: LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing [in Russian].
5. Hrytsenko, A. (Ed.). (2008). Institutional dynamics of architectonic and economic transfor-mation. Kharkov: Fort, 2008 [in Russian].
6. Kaznacheev, V.P. (1989). V.I. Vernadsky’s Teachings the biosphere and the noosphere. Novosibirsk: Nauka. Sib. otdelenie [in Russian].
7. Kriuchkova, I.V. (2004). Structural factors of economic development of Ukraine. Kyiv: Naukova dumka [in Ukrainian].
8. The Growth Report. Strategies for Sustained Growth and Inclusive Development. (2009). Moscow: Ves’ Mir [in Russian].
№ 4/2018
1Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine
Digital development: structure, capitalization and socialization
Ekon. teor. 2018; 4:5-20 | https://doi.org/10.15407/etet2018.04.005 |
ABSTRACT ▼
The author shows that digital development is an integral part of a more general process of transi-tion from the industrial-market to the information-network economy and formation of a reconstruc-tive type of development. The essence of the digital economy as a system of economic relations related to production, distribution, exchange and consumption of goods is determined on the basis of the use of digital technologies based on a discrete coding system of information processing and transmission. It is shown that the development of digital technologies is correlated with the structure of human thinking.
Based on determining the reflection interaction in the triad of "subject-object-activity", the author reveals the structure of digital development, and justifies the interpretation of the virtual as an exte-riorized ideal transformed into an external process, which acts as a reality in relation to human consciousness. The development of digital technologies forms a whole world of the virtual, which exists alongside and in conjunction with the real one, resulting in the world becoming hybrid. The contradictory relationship between digitalization, capitalization and socialization is shown and the challenges of society arising in the process of digital development are clarified. The emphasis is placed on the importance of forming digital competences and ensuring a proper social quality of the development.
Keywords:digital development, digital economy, digital technologies, digitalization, capitalization, socialization, the virtual, the real, hybrid world
JEL: O01, 03
Article in Russian (pp. 5 - 20) | Download | Downloads :796 |
Article in Ukrainian (pp. 5 - 20) | Download | Downloads :618 |
REFERENCES ▼
2. Keshelava, A.V., Budanov, V.G., Rumjancev, V.Ju. et al. (2017). Introduction to the 'Digital' economy. On the threshold of the digital future. Book One. VNIIGeosistem [in Russian].
3. Hegel, G. (1974). Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Vol. 1. The science of logic. Moscow: Mysl [in Russian].
4. Hrytsenko, A.A. (2016). Reconstructive economic development is a new paradigm for Ukraine. Reconstructive economic development: main directions, efficiency and social justice. Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine. Retrieved from ief.org.ua/docs/scc/2.pdf [in Ukrainian].
5. Rjabova, V. (2017). The report of the joint commission of UNESCO and ITU on the digital skills necessary for 'life and work' was released. Retrieved from d-russia.ru/vyshel-doklad-sovmestnoj-komissii-yunesko-i-mse-o-tsifrovyh-navykah-neobhodimyh-dlya-zhizni-i-raboty.html [in Russian].
№ 1/2019
1Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine
Digital development: structure, capitalization and socialization
Ekon. teor. 2019; 1:0-0 |
ABSTRACT ▼
The author shows that digital development is an integral part of a more general process of transition from the industrial-market to the information-network economy and formation of a reconstructive type of development. The essence of the digital economy as a system of economic relations related to production, distribution, exchange and consumption of goods is determined on the basis of the use of digital technologies based on a discrete coding system of information processing and transmission. It is shown that the development of digital technologies is correlated with the structure of human thinking.
Based on determining the reflection interaction in the triad of \"subject-object-activity\", the author reveals the structure of digital development, and justifies the interpretation of the virtual as an exteriorized ideal transformed into an external process, which acts as a reality in relation to human consciousness. The development of digital technologies forms a whole world of the virtual, which exists alongside and in conjunction with the real one, resulting in the world becoming hybrid. The contradictory relationship between digitalization, capitalization and socialization is shown and the challenges of society arising in the process of digital development are clarified. The emphasis is placed on the importance of forming digital competences and ensuring a proper social quality of the development.
Keywords:digital development, digital economy, digital technologies, digitalization, capitalization, socialization, the virtual, the real, hybrid world
JEL: O01, 03
REFERENCES ▼
2. Keshelava, A.V., Budanov, V.G., Rumjancev, V.Ju. et al. (2017). Introduction to the \"Digital\" economy. On the threshold of the digital future. Book One. VNIIGeosistem [in Russian].
3. Hegel, G. (1974). Encyclopedia of Philosophy. T. 1. The science of logic. Moscow: Mysl [in Russian].
4. Hrytsenko, A.A. (2016). Reconstructive economic development is a new paradigm for Ukraine. Reconstructive economic development: main directions, efficiency and social justice: monograph collection. State Enterprise Institute of Economics. and predicting. NAS of Ukraine\". URL: ief.org.ua/docs/scc/2.pdf [in Ukrainian].
5. Rjabova, V. (2017). The report of the joint commission of UNESCO and ITU on the digital skills necessary for “life and work” was released. URL: d-russia.ru/vyshel-doklad-sovmestnoj-komissii-yunesko-i-mse-o-tsifrovyh-navykah-neobhodimyh-dlya-zhizni-i-raboty.html [in Russian].
HEYETS Valeriy M.1, GRYTSENKO Andrii Andriyovych2
1State Organization “Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine”
2Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine
«TERTIUM DATUR» by Grzegorz W. Kolodko
Ekon. teor. 2019; 1:5-19 | https://doi.org/10.15407/etet2019.01.005 |
ABSTRACT ▼
The article reveals the logical and historical grounds of the Grzegorz W. Kolodko’s approach to the interpretation of the phenomenon of China building socialism with Chinese characteristics and developing capitalist relations. Reality goes beyond the dilemma of "socialism or capitalism" and represents something third, having an independent meaning. It is shown that the starting point for the emergence of society and man is a jointly-divided labor whose two sides (jointness and separation) while historically evolving, are embodied on the side of separation in the market economy and capitalism, and on the side of jointness in the state and socialism. On this basis, there arises a confrontation between two opposing systems: capitalism and socialism. The subsequent historical progress turns capitalization and socialization into two complementary processes of the development of society, which are no longer adequate to describe in terms of the two systems. A certain third entity emerges. This proves that "Tertium Datur" by Grzegorz W. Kolodko has not only practical importance, but also deep logical and historical grounds.
Keywords: capitalism, socialism, jointly divided labor, state, market economy, Kolodko, China
JEL: B41, P1, P2
Article in Russian (pp. 5 - 19) | Download | Downloads :637 |
Article in Ukrainian (pp. 5 - 19) | Download | Downloads :676 |
REFERENCES ▼
2. Heyets, V.M. (2009). Society, state, economics: phenomenology of interaction and development. Institute of economics and forecasting of the NAS of Ukraine. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
3. Grinberg, R.S., Rubinstein A.Ya. (2013). Individual & State: An Economic Dilemma. Moscow: Ves mir [in Russian].
4. Hrytsenko, A.A. (2005). The development of forms of exchange, value and money. Kyiv: Osnova [in Russian].
5. Kolodko, G.V. (2014). Where the world is going: The political economy of the future. Moscow: Magistr [in Russian].
6. Kolodko, G.V. (2018). Socialism or capitalism? Tertium datur. Ekon. prognozuvannâ – Economy and forecasting, 1, 7-36. doi: https://doi.org/10.15407/eip2018.01.007">doi.org/10.15407/eip2018.01.007">https://doi.org/10.15407/eip2018.01.007 [in Ukrainian].
7. Marx, K. (1960). Capital. Vol. 1. In K. Marx, F. Engels. Writings, 23 [in Russian].
8. Kolodko, G.W. (May-June, 2004). Institutions, Policies and Growth. Rivista di Politica Economica, 45-79.
9. Kolodko, G.W. (2014a). The New Pragmatism, or Economics and Policy for the Future. Acta Oeconomica, 64(2), 139-160. doi: https://doi.org/10.1556/AOecon.64.2014.2.1">doi.org/10.1556/AOecon.64.2014.2.1">https://doi.org/10.1556/AOecon.64.2014.2.1
10. Kolodko, G.W. (2014b). Whither the World: The Political Economy of the Future. Vol. 1. Palgrave Macmillan.
11. Kolodko, G.W., McMahon, W.W. (1987). Stagflation and Shortageflation: A Comparative Approach. Kyklos, 40(2), 176-197. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6435.1987.tb02671.x">doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6435.1987.tb02671.x">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6435.1987.tb02671.x
12. Kornai, J. (2016). The System Paradigm Revisited Clarification and Additions in the Light of Experiences in the Post-Socialist Countries. Acta Oeconomica, 66(4), 347-569. doi: https://doi.org/10.1556/032.2016.66.4.1">doi.org/10.1556/032.2016.66.4.1">https://doi.org/10.1556/032.2016.66.4.1
13. Fukuyama, F. (1989). The End of History. The National Interest, Summer. Retrieved from www.wesjones.com/eoh.htm/
№ 3/2019
GRYTSENKO Andrii Andriyovych1, BOBUKH Iryna
1Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine
Macroeconomics. Textbook. Theme 39. Ukraine in the global economic space and its competitiveness
Ekon. teor. 2019; 3:101-114 |
ABSTRACT ▼
Keywords:
JEL:
Article in Russian (pp. 101 - 114) | Download | Downloads :464 |
Article in Ukrainian (pp. 101 - 114) | Download | Downloads :484 |
REFERENCES ▼
2. The Global Competitiveness Reports 2002–2018. World Economic Forum. Geneva, 2002–2018.
№ 1/2020
GRYTSENKO Andrii Andriyovych1, BANDURA Oleksandr 2
1Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine
2Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine
Features and factors of contemporary inflation dynamics
Ekon. teor. 2020; 1:77-93 | https://doi.org/10.15407/etet2020.01.077 |
ABSTRACT ▼
The article considers the features of contemporary inflation, which are difficult to explain within the framework of well-known theories. We used the authors’ CMI-model of economic cycles to explain the phenomena of low inflation in the US economy and relatively low economic growth under the record high employment during 2008-2019. In this model, the aggregate money supply M2 is divided in two parts: 1) neutral (that does not affect the growth rate) and 2) non-neutral (that affects the growth rate). We proved empirically that the implementation of the "quantitative easing" monetary policy through the financial markets (to reduce the short- and long-term interest rates) has little effect on the economic growth rate, but mainly causes the growth of the stock markets, which absorb neutral money supply, holding back the inflation process. However, this policy may cause a financial bubble in the stock markets and increases the probability of a significant correction in the value of financial assets in the case of a new recession. We evaluated the outlooks of the beginning of a new recession in the US economy that can cause a new recession in Ukrainian economy as well. The positive effect from the “quantitative easing” monetary policy is a record duration (for the entire history of observations) of the US recovery that contributed to the record low unemployment. The negative effects of this policy include the least (for the last 50 years) average economic growth rates during the recovery and relatively low level of labor productivity since 2010. At the same time, the existence of developed financial markets and stimuli for investments in financial assets may serve as an effective instrument to hold back the inflation. Therefore, any contributing from all regulators in development of financial markets would be also useful for Ukraine.
Keywords:inflation, business cycle, financial market, monetary policy, (non)neutral money, recession, growth rate, financial index.
JEL: E30, E31, E32, E37
Article in English (pp. 77 - 93) | ||
Article in Russian (pp. 77 - 93) | Download | Downloads :532 |
Article in Ukrainian (pp. 77 - 93) | Download | Downloads :519 |
REFERENCES ▼
2. Polterovich, V. (1997). Crisis of economic theory. The unknown economy: a report at a seminar at TSEMI RAS. 1997. Retrieved from mathecon.cemi.rssi.ru/vm_polterovich/files/Crisis_Economic_Theory.pdf [in Russian].
3. Ader, D. (2018). U.S. recession looms, yield curve inversion or not. Bloom-berg Prophets. March 8. Retrieved from www.bloomberg.com
4. Bauer, M., Mertens, T. (2018). Economic forecast with the yield curve. Fed-eral Reserve Bank of San-Francisco Economic Letter, Economic Research 2018–07. Retrieved from www.frbsf.org
5. Bernoth, K., König, P. Raab, C. (2015). Large-Scale Asset Purchases by Central Banks II: Empirical Evidence. DIW Roundup: Politik im Fokus, No. 61. Re-trieved from hdl.handle.net/10419/111846
6. Bhatnagar, S., Cormier, A-K., Hess, K., Leon-Manlagnit, P. et al. (2017). Low Inflation in Advanced Economies: Facts and Drivers. Staff Analytical Note by International Economic Analysis Department. Bank of Canada. P. 20. Retrieved from www.bank-banque-canada.ca
7. Boesler, M. (2018). Fed Chairman Powell Unravels Inflation Riddle. Bloom-berg Markets. April 6. Retrieved from www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-04-06/who-needs-an-economics-ph-d-as-powell-unravels-inflation-riddle
8. Chappatta, B. (2018, June 19). Pension plans exert an invisible force on the yield curve. Bloomberg news. June 19. Retrieved from www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2018-06-19/pension-plans-exert-pressure-on-the-bond-yield-curve?utm_medium=email&utm_source=newsletter&utm_term=180619&utm_campaign=sharetheview
9. Ho-Yin, Y., King-Tai, L. (2011). The Effects of Quantitative Easing on Infla-tion Rate: A Possible Explanation on the Phenomenon. European Journal of Eco-nomics, Finance and Administrative Sciences, 41, 7. Retrieved from researchdb.hsu.edu.hk/assets/upload/103/The_Effects_of_Quantitative_Easing_on_Inflation_Rate_-_A_Possible_Explanation_on_the_Phenomenon_(2011).pdf
10. Meinusch, A., Tillmann, P. (2014). The macroeconomic impact of uncon-ventional monetary policy shocks. Joint Discussion Paper Series in Economics. Working paper No. 26-2014; Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, 35. Re-trieved from hdl.handle.net/10419/102367
11. Orphanides, A. (January, 2002). Monetary policy rules and the Great Infla-tion. Division of Monetary Affairs, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve Sys-tem. Meeting of the American Economic Association, Atlanta, GA. doi.org/10.17016/FEDS.2002.08
12. Smith, N. (May 1, 2018). What Causes Recessions. Bloomberg Econom-ics, Econ Grapples.
13. Smialek, J. (2017, October 15). Yellen calls inflation the "Biggest surprise" in the Economy. Bloomberg Markets. Retrieved from www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-10-15/yellen-says-fed-to-raise-rates-gradually-as-inflation-picks-up
№ 3/2020
GRYTSENKO Andrii Andriyovych1, BURLAI Tetiana V.2
1Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine
2Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine
The impact of digitalization on social development
Ekon. teor. 2020; 3:24-51 | https://doi.org/10.15407/etet2020.03.024 |
ABSTRACT ▼
The article shows the place of digitalization in the natural transition from the in-dustrial-market to the information-network economy. The authors clarify the struc-ture of relations that determine the mechanism of interaction of technical and technological processes of digitalization and socio-economic relations, and note the complexity of the reflexive interaction of the technical, technological and so-cio-economic components of societal development. The objective foundations and modern features of the processes of dissemination of information, communi-cation and digital technologies, manifested at the societal level, are revealed. The dualistic nature of digitalization development is revealed: the introduction of the latest technologies not only opens up additional opportunities for business, gov-ernments and people, but also generates significant problems, challenges and risks, forming the so-called "digital gap". It is emphasized that in the social di-mension, the most characteristic of such gaps is the difference in opportunities for access to digital technologies, which potentially leads to unfair distribution of benefits and increased inequality in society. The main social risks caused by the processes of digitalization at the micro and macro levels are identified. The dy-namics of digitalization processes and their impact on social development in a global and national context are comprehensively characterized. Shown various national management strategies, formulated as responses to the challenges of digital development and with a focus on minimizing the social risks associated with them. The modern approaches of the European Union to regulating the im-pact of digitalization on social development and employment are revealed, includ-ing those related to the adoption in 2010 of the Digital Agenda for Europe, the construction of the European Digital Single Market and the implementation of the European Gigabit Society Strategy until 2025. Proposed a few corrections in the mechanisms of Ukraine’s national policy regarding the anticipation and regulation of the social consequences of digitalization, in particular, in the context of the Strategy for the digital transformation of the social sphere of Ukraine presented in September 2020.
Keywords:information-network economy, digitalization, social development, social risks, government policy
JEL: А130, I310, O110, O290
Article in Russian (pp. 24 - 51) | Download | Downloads :504 |
Article in Ukrainian (pp. 24 - 51) | Download | Downloads :540 |
REFERENCES ▼
2. Akatkin, Ju. M., Jasinovskaja, E. D. (2019). Digital Transformation of Public Administration: Datacentricity and Semantic Interoperability. Moscow: Lenand [in Russian].
3. World Bank (2019). World Development Report 2019: The Changing Nature of Work. Washington, DC [in Russian].
4. United Nations (June 2020). Report of the Secretary-General Roadmap for Digital Cooperation [in Russian].
5. Hrytsenko, A. A. (2018). Digital development: structure, capitalization and socialization. Ekon. teor. - Economic theory, 4, 5-20. doi.org/10.15407/etet2018.04.005 [in Ukrainian].
6. Kolot, A., Herasymenko, O. (2020). The sphere of work in the conditions of the global socio-economic reality 2020: challenges for Ukraine. Kyiv: Fond im. Fridrikha Eberta [in Ukrainian].
7. Koh, L.V., Koh, Ju.V. (2019). Analysis of existing approaches to measuring the digital economy. Nauchno-tehnicheskie vedomosti SPbGPU. Jekonomicheskie nauki - Scientific and technical statements of SPbSPU. Economic sciences, 12: 4, 78-89 [in Russian].
8. Maxton, G., Randers, J. (2017). In search of prosperity. Managing economic development to reduce unemployment, inequality and climate change. Kyiv: Pabulum [in Ukrainian].
9. Malkov, S. Ju. (2018). On the risks of the information society. Informacionnoe obshhestvo - Information society, 2, 19-24 [in Russian].
10. International Labour Office (2019). Work for a brighter future - Global Commission on the Future of Work. Geneva: ILO [in Russian].
11. International Labour Organization (2018). Work on Digital Labour Platforms in Ukraine: Issues and Policy Perspectives [in Ukrainian].
12. O'Nil, K. (2020). BIG DATA. Weapons of mathematical destruction. How big data increases inequality and threatens democracy. Kyiv: Fors Ukraina [in Ukrainian].
13. Osipov, G. S. (2001). Artificial Intelligence: State of Research and a Few Words on the Future. Novosti iskusstvennogo intellekta - Artificial Intelligence News, 1, 3-13 [in Russian].
14. Sadovaja, E. S. (2018). The digital economy and the new labor market paradigm. Mirovaja jekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnoshenija - World economy and international relations, 62, 12, 35-45. doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2018-62-12-35-45 [in Russian].
15. Uemura, N. (2017, August 11). Strategy "Society 5.0". Izvestija - News, 148 (29886) [in Russian].
16. Khandii, O. O. (2019). Social resources of economic development: levers of state regulation. Institute for the Ekonomy of Industry, NAS of Ukraine. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
17. Shamileva, L. L., Khandii, O. O. (2019). The concept of PJSC-analysis of risk identification in the field of social and labor relations in terms of digitalization of the economy. The sphere of employment and income in the digital economy: regulatory mechanisms, challenges and dominants of development: Coll. thesis add. participants international scientific-practical conf., Oct. 23-24, 2019 (p. 56-58). Kyiv: KNEU [in Ukrainian].
18. European Commission (2014). The Digital Agenda Toolbox.
19. European Commission (2019, April). Report of the High-Level Expert Group on the Impact of the Digital Transformation on EU Labour Markets.
20. European Commission (2019, August). Connectivity for a European Gigabit Society.
21. European Commission (2020, June). Digital Economy and Society Index (DESI) 2020. Thematic chapters.
22. Greenfield, A. (2017). Radical Technologies: The Design of Everyday Life. London-New York: VERSO.
23. Hauben, H., Lenaerts, K., Kraatz, S. (2020, June). Platform economy and precarious work: Mitigating risks. Directorate-General for Internal Policies of the European Parliament.
24. ITU (2019). Measuring Digital Development: Facts and figures 2019. International Telecommunication Union (ITU).
25. McKinsey Global Institute (2019, February). Notes from the AI frontier: Tackling Europe's gap in digital and AI. Discussion Paper.
26. McKinsey & Company, European Commission (2020, February). Shaping the digital transformation in Europe. Working paper: Economic potential.
27. Quaglio, G., Millar, S. (2020, May). Potentially Negative Effects of Internet Use. Panel for the Future of Science and Technology, European Parliamentary Research Service.
28. Ramírez-Djumena, N. (2016, September). Picture This: Digital Divide. Finance & Development.
29. UNCTAD (October 2017). Information Economy Report 2017: Digitalization, Trade and Development.
30. UNCTAD (2018). Technology and Innovation Report 2018: Harnessing Frontier Technologies for Sustainable Development.
31. UNCTAD (2019, May). Digital development: Opportunities and challenges.
32. UNCTAD (2019, July). Digital Economy Report 2019. Value Creation and Capture: Implications for Developing Countries.
№ 1/2021
BILORUS Oleg H.1, GRYTSENKO Andrii Andriyovych2
1Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine
2Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine
Innovation and information economy: digital dimension and evolutionary dynamics in a global context
Ekon. teor. 2021; 1:115-119 |
ABSTRACT ▼
=
Keywords:-
JEL: -
Article in Russian (pp. 115 - 119) | Download | Downloads :291 |
Article in Ukrainian (pp. 115 - 119) | Download | Downloads :400 |
REFERENCES ▼
№ 4/2022
1Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine
Economic contradictions of globalization and localization and their modern manifestations
Ekon. teor. 2022; 4:5-29 | https://doi.org/10.15407/etet2022.04.005 |
ABSTRACT ▼
The article reveals the methodological approaches in the research on the contradictions of globalization and localization, their movement at different stages of the devel-opment of society and their modern manifestations. It is found that the cell from which these contradictions grow in history is jointly divided labor. Jointness in the process of historical development reaches its limit in globalization, and division - in localization. Before the age of great geographical discoveries and the emergence of the global market, the contradictions of globalization and localization existed implicitly, and then they took an explicit form and passed through the three following stages: development through international trade, development through the globalization of capital, and de-velopment by moving globalization mainly into virtual space. The author shows the diversity of forms of solving the contradictions of globalization and localization. Among them, the change of world order, hybrid war and reconstructive post-war recovery are identified and revealed. The main contradiction of modern times is found to be the contradiction between globalization, which develops due to informational and financial technologies, and the localization of material and labor resources, which cannot move in space at the speed of information and financial flows. The author clarifies peculiarities in the manifestation and settlement of the contradictions of globalization and local-ization in Ukraine, in whose space the global contradictions of the main global players are presently localized. The article shows the need for reconstructive recovery for Ukraine based on this country’s nationally rooted development.
Keywords:globalization, localization, contradictions, world order, hybrid system "peace-war", nationally rooted development
JEL: F01, F02, F 51, F60, F63
Article in Russian (pp. 5 - 29) | Download | Downloads :167 |
Article in Ukrainian (pp. 5 - 29) | Download | Downloads :205 |
REFERENCES ▼
2. Hegel, G. (1971). Science of logic. T. 2: Doctrine of essence. Moscow: Mysl [in Russian].
3. Heyets, V., Podolets R., Dyachuk, O. (2022). The post-war economy of Ukraine in the imperatives of low-carbon development (macro assessment). Science and innovation, 6. doi.org/10.15407/visn2022.03.008 [in Ukrainian].
4. Grytsenko, A. (2020). Economic and informational imperative of the new statistical paradigm. Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
5. Grytsenko, A. (2021). Research methodology of the transformation of economic functions of the state in the conditions of globalization. Ekon. Ukr. – Economy of Ukraine, 7, 05-13. doi. org/10.15407/economyukr.2021.07.005 [in Ukrainian].
6. Dmitriev, A. (2001). The Peace of Westphalia of 1648 and modern international law: a monograph. Kyiv: Koretsky Institute of State and Law of National Academy of Science of Ukraine; Kyiv University of Law of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine [in Ukrainian].
7. Marx, K., Engels, F. (1955-1983). Works. Edition 2nd. Moscow: Izdatelstvo politicheskoj literatury [in Russian].
8. Pavlenko, Y. (2002). History of world civilization. Philosophical analysis. Kiev: Feniks [in Russian].
9. Dalio, R. (2021). The Principles for Dealing with the Changing World Order: Why Nations Succeed or Fail. New York, London, Toronto, Sydney, New Dehli: Avid Reader Press.
10. Huntington, S. P. (1977) The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order. New York: Touchstone book, Simon and Schuster. 368. Retrieved 30.04.2022 from msuweb.montclair.edu/~lebelp/1993SamuelPHuntingtonTheClashOfCivilizationsAndTheRemakingofWorldOrder.pdf/
11. Stiglitz, J. (2022). Getting deglobalisation right. Retrieved 12.06.2022 from socialeurope.eu/getting-deglobalisation-right/
12. Toynbee, A. J. (1948). Civilization on Trial. New York: Oxford University Press. Retrieved from ia801606.us.archive.org/22/items/in.ernet.dli.2015.185313/2015.185313.Civilization-On-Trial.pdf/
№ 2/2023
GRYTSENKO Andrii Andriyovych1, BURLAI Tetiana V.2, BORZENKO Olena 3
1Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine
2Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine
3Institute for Economics and Forecasting of NAS of Ukraine
Societal consequences of modern hybrid warfare: theoretical foundations and institutional dimension
Ekon. teor. 2023; 2:5-28 | https://doi.org/10.15407/etet2023.02.005 |
ABSTRACT ▼
The article reveals the concept of societal in the political-economic discourse, and shows its connection with the relevant philosophical and sociological vision. It is argued that the current Russian-Ukrainian war has clear signs of a modern hybrid war, which is generated by the globallocal hybrid system of "peace – war" and combines a whole range of means, from military-political and economic to cybernetic and cultural and humanitarian ones. Based on the combination of political-economic and sociological discourses in a broad sense, it is substantiated that the main components of the hybrid system "peace – war" from the point of view of the transformation of social relations are: armedmilitary, financial-economic, and informational-spiritual components, which cause a comprehensive impact on people’s worldview, positioning and behav-ior, which leads to significant societal consequences.
The authors give various characteristics of the institutional dimension of the war’s societal consequences. Theoretically, the phenomenon of emergent institutional order is taken as the basis for considering the institutional dimension of the societal consequences caused by the hybrid war. It is revealed that in the martial law conditions, the role of the trust institution is growing (the trust institution is considered as a defining and integral construct of the socio-economic system’s institutional architecture, embod-ied both in trust in the state and power structures, and in trust in new institutions created by the hybrid war (volunteers and various forms of amateur civil movements)).
The authors show that in the context of societal development in the conditions of war shocks and post-war recovery of Ukraine, the quality of institutions and the state’s institutional potential play an extremely important role. Analysis of the societal conse-quences of the Russian Federation’s invasion in Ukraine in the institutional dimension shows the need to overcome the key institutional destructions generated both in the previous period and during the war. Also, it is necessary to create an institutional basis for a new economic model focused on ensuring a combination of Ukrainian effective reconstructive recovery in the post-war period and its full integration into the European Union and the world space.
Keywords:societal system, hybrid threats, institutions, military shocks, reconstructive economic recovery
JEL: E02, F29, H11, N40, O43, P48
Article in Ukrainian (pp. 5 - 28) | Download | Downloads :252 |
REFERENCES ▼
2. Bond, I., Cornago, E., et al. (2023, February). A year of war in Europe: The balance sheet. Centre for European Reform Policy brief. Retrieved from www.cer.eu/sites/default/files/pbrief_ukraine_1year_22.2.23.pdf
3. Butorina, O.V., Borko, Ju.A. (2022). Benefits of Regional Integration: Revisiting the Concept. Sovremennaja Evropa – Modern Europe, 1, 5-20. doi.org/10.31857/S0201708322010016/ [in Russian].
4. Grytsenko, A.A. (ed.) (2020). Trust in the socio-economic system. Trust in the institutional architectonics of space-time (vol. 1). Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine. Kyiv [in Russian].
5. Grytsenko, A.A. (ed.) (2021). Formation of the institutional architecture of the information and network economy. Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine; Academy of Financial Management. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
6. Grytsenko, A.A. (ed.) (2022). Economic contradictions of globalization and localization in the conditions of hybrid war and post-war reconstruction. Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine. Kyiv. Retrieved from ief.org.ua/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Ec-superech-globaliz-ta-localiz-v-umomah-gibryd-viyny.pdf/ [in Ukrainian].
7. Grushetskyi, A. (2023, January). Dynamics of trust in social institutions in 2021–2022. Kyiv International Institute of Sociology. Retrieved from kiis.com.ua/?lang=ukr&cat=reports&id=1174&page=4/ [in Ukrainian]
8. Dembitskyi, S. (2022). Settings regarding societal values during the war: the liberal-democratic vector of Ukraine's development. In E. Golovaha, S. Makyeyev (eds.), Ukrainian society in the conditions of war. 2022. Kyiv: Institute of Sociology of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. Retrieved from i-soc.com.ua/assets/files/monitoring/maket-vijna...2022dlya-tipografiivse.pdf/ [in Ukrainian].
9. Recovery and reconstruction of the post-war economy of Ukraine (2022). Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine. Kyiv. Retrieved from ief.org.ua/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Vidnovlennja-ta-reconstrukcsja-povojennoji-economiky.pdf/ [in Ukrainian].
10. Ivashuk, Yu. (2016). Emergent institutional order in the economy and its behavioural foundations. Jekonomicheskaja teorija – Economic theory, 3, 69-81. doi.org/10.15407/etet2016.03.069/ [in Ukrainian].
11. Leusenko, I.V. (2011). The term "societal" (societal) and the formation of methodological foundations for the study of the sociology of the norm in the work of T. Parsons. Sistema cennostej sovremennogo obshhestva – The value system of modern society, 21, 133-141. Retrieved from: cyberleninka.ru/article/n/termin-sotsietalnyy-societal-i-formirovanie-metodologicheskih-osnov-issledovaniya-sotsiologii-normy-v-tvorchestve-t-parsonsa/ [in Russian].
12. OSCE (2003, December). OSCE Strategy for Countering Threats to Security and Stability in the 21st Century. Retrieved from www.osce.org/files/f/documents/5/2/17508.pdf/ [in Russian].
13. United Nations (2022). Report of the Secretary-General on the work of the Organization (A/77/1, 77th session). Retrieved from digitallibrary.un.org/record/3987317?ln=en/ [in Russian].
14. Parsons, T. (1997). The system of modern societies. Moscow: Aspekt-Press [in Russian].
15. Office of IOM in Ukraine (March 2023). Crisis in Ukraine 2022–2023: A Year of Response. Retrieved from ukraine.iom.int/sites/g/files/tmzbdl1861/files/documents/2023-03/IOM%20Ukraine%20Regional%20Response%201%20Year%20Special%20Report%20Ukr.pdf/ [in Ukrainian].
16. Semenets’-Orlova, I.A. (2022). Modern conceptual approaches to the definition of the concept of "ethnocentrism" in the two-dimensional field of inter-ethnic separation and integration. Ukr. socìum –Ukrainian society, 2(81), 116-133. doi.org/10.15407/socium2022.02.116 [in Ukrainian].
17. Sorokin, P. (1992). Human, civilization, society. Moscow: Politizdat [in Russian].
18. Sociological Group "Rating" (2023, February). How the war changed me and the country. Results of the year. Retrieved from ratinggroup.ua/files/ratinggroup/reg_files/rating_war_changed_me_and_the_country_february_2023.pdf/ [in Ukrainian].
19. Sociological Group "Rating" (March 2023). All-Ukrainian survey of the International Republican Institute (IRI): February 2023. Retrieved from ratinggroup.ua/files/ratinggroup/reg_files/ukr-23-ns-01-ukr_for_public_-_final.pdf/ [in Ukrainian].
20. Sushiy, O.V. (2012). Cultural and symbolic foundations of national identity. Derzhavne upravlinnia: teoriia ta praktyka – Public administration: theory and practice, 2, 1-7. Retrieved from nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Dutp_2012_2_7/ [in Ukrainian].
21. UNHCR (February 2023). Ukraine: Humanitarian Response Plan for 2023. Retrieved from www.unhcr.org/ua/wp-content/uploads/sites/38/2023/02/Ukraine-Humanitarian-Response-Plan-February-2023-UK.pdf/ [in Ukrainian].
22. Bilal, A. (November 2021). Hybrid Warfare – New Threats, Complexity, and “Trust” as the Antidote. NATO Review. Retrieved from www.nato.int/docu/review/articles/2021/11/30/hybrid-warfare-new-threats-complexity-and-trust-as-the-antidote/index.html/
23. Caliskan, M., Liégeois, M. (2021). The concept of “hybrid warfare” undermines NATO’s strategic thinking: insights from interviews with NATO officials. Small Wars &Insurgencies, 32: 2, 295-319. Retrieved from www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09592318.2020.1860374/; doi.org/10.1080/09592318.2020.1860374
24. Fox, R.C. (Ed.) (2005). After Parsons — a theory of social action for the twenty-first century. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
25. Grytsenko, A. (2022, May 20-21). Hybrid System "peace-war" as a Modern Form of the Changing World Order. In A. Grytsenko, M. Kidiryuz (eds.), Proceeding Book of the Second International Symposium on the Study of War (p. 67-73). Economic Development and Social Research Institute. Ankara: IKSAD Publishing House.
26. Johnson, R. (2018). Hybrid War and Its Countermeasures: A Critique of the Literature. Small Wars & Insurgencies, 29(1), 141-163. Retrieved from www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09592318.2018.1404770?src=recsys/; doi.org/10.1080/09592318.2018.1404770
27. Keller, A.G. (1915). Societal evolution: a study of the evolutionary basis of the science of society. New York, The Macmillan Co.
28. Mattis, J.N., Hoffman, F. (2005, November). Future Warfare: The Rise of Hybrid Wars. The U.S. Naval Institute Proceedings, 131/11/1, 233. Retrieved from www.usni.org/magazines/proceedings/2005/november/future-warfare-rise-hybrid-wars/
29. Parsons, T. (1965). Theories of Society: Foundations of Modern Sociological Theory. Free Press of Glencoe.
30. Quirk, P., Sharma P. (February 2023). Advancing a framework for the stabilization and reconstruction of Ukraine. Issue Brief. Atlantic Council. Retrieved from www.atlanticcouncil.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Advancing_a_Framework_Final.pdf
31. Sorokin, P.A. (1928). Contemporary Sociological Theories. New York and London: Harper & Brothers.
32. Sorokin, P.A. (1962). Society, Culture and Personality. Their Structure and Dynamics. New York.
33. Sumner, W. (1959). Folkways. New York.
34. Sumner, W., Keller, A. (1942). The science of society. New York.
35. World Bank (April 6, 2023). Russia’s Invasion of Ukraine and Cost-of-Living Crisis Dim Growth Prospects in Emerging Europe and Central Asia. Retrieved from www.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/2023/04/06/russian-invasion-of-ukraine-and-cost-of-living-crisis-dim-growth-prospects-in-emerging-europe-and-central-asia
Сalendar of events
M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ||||||
2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 |
16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 |
23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
30 |