Articles by : Yeshchenko P. № 2/2009
Political economyYESHCHENKO P. 1, CHUBUK L. P.
1Institute of Sociology, NAS of Ukraine
Social housing and models of its provision
ABSTRACT ▼
The authors consider the modern condition of housing in this country’s economy. They associate the development of the sector of social housing with correction of the general economic policy towards a model in which two policies would be combined, namely, the policy of efficiency and that of redistribution. He article provides proposals on the conceptual foundations of the provision and development of social housing in Ukraine.
Keywords:
Article in Russian (pp. 36 - 46) | Download | Downloads :319 |
Article in Ukrainian (pp. 36 - 46) | Download | Downloads :361 |
REFERENCES ▼
№ 4/2012
Political economyYESHCHENKO P. 1, ARSEENKO A.
1Institute of Sociology, NAS of Ukraine
Search of a new paradigm of economic development a ategorical imperative of our time
ABSTRACT ▼
The article is devoted to the analysis of various features of the modern crisis condition of the world economy, and of the place and role of economic and other social studies in that process. Focusing attention on the problem of search of a new paradigm of economic study, the authors justify their own approach to its solution.
Keywords:
Article in Russian (pp. 5 - 18) | Download | Downloads :397 |
Article in Ukrainian (pp. 5 - 18) | Download | Downloads :360 |
REFERENCES ▼
№ 3/2014
Political economyYESHCHENKO P. 1
1Institute of Sociology, NAS of Ukraine
Global crisis and crisis of economic theory: relationship and interaction
ABSTRACT ▼
The article considers various scientific approaches to the causes and consequences of the global economic crisis, and the place of economic science in this process. The author analyzes the problem of the change of the paradigm of economic growth, and justifies his approach to its solution.
Keywords:crisis of economic theory, the global crisis, plurality of views, the system of economic science, economic science paradigm, a new model of economic development
JEL: A10
Article in Russian (pp. 24 - 37) | Download | Downloads :341 |
Article in Ukrainian (pp. 24 - 37) | Download | Downloads :380 |
REFERENCES ▼
Agoshkova E.B., Ahlibininskij B.V. (1998) Jevoljucija ponjatija sistemy // Voprosy filosofii. № 7.
Grinjeujej D. i dr. (red.) (2002) Panorama jekonomicheskoj mysli konca HH stoletija. SPb.
Gricenko A. (2014) Struktura predmeta i metoda jekonomicheskoj teorii // Formuvannja rinkovoї ekonomіki: Zb. nauk. prac'. № 31. K. S. 7–18.
Iglton T. (2012) Pochemu Marks byl prav. M.: Kar'era Press.
Klejner G.B. (2007) Sistemnaja paradigma i jekonomicheskaja politika // Obshhestvennye nauki i sovremennost'. № 2–3.
Klejner G.B. (2011) Novaja teorija jekonomicheskih sistem i ejo predlozhenija // Vestnik Rossijskoj akademii nauk. T. 81. № 9.
Kornai Ja. (2002) Sistemnaja paradigma // Voprosy jekonomiki. № 4.
Kouz R. (1991) Firma, rynki, proizvodstvo. N'ju-Jork.
Makkonnell K.R., Brju S.L. (1992) Jekonomiks. Principy, problemy i politika. M.: Respublika.
Marks K. (1955) Kapital. M.: Gosudarstvennoe izdatel'stvo politicheskoj literatury.
Martynov V.A. (ruk.) (2002) K voprosu o tak nazyvaemom krizise jekonomicheskoj nauki. Materialy teoreticheskogo seminara IMJeMO. M.
Poltarovich V.M. (1998) Krizis jekonomicheskoj nauki // Jekonomicheskaja nauka sovremennoj Rossii. M.: CJeMI RAN. № 1.
Rjazanov V.T. (2006) Antropologicheskij princip v jekonomike // Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Serija 5. Vyp. 14.
Smit A. (2007 Issledovanie o prirode i prichinah bogatstva narodov. M.: Jeksmo.
Tambovcev V.L. (2003) O krizise jekonomicheskoj nauki // Jekonomicheskij vestnik Rostovskogo gosuniversiteta. T. 1. № 3.
Hubiev K. (2006) O problemah nauchnoj metodologii // Obshhestvo i jekonomika. № 3.
Shumpeter J.A. (2008) Teorija jekonomicheskogo razvitija. Kapitalizm, socializm i demokratija. M.: Jeksmo.
№ 4/2015
Political economyYESHCHENKO P. 1
1Institute of Sociology, NAS of Ukraine
Retrospective and perspective of political economy
ABSTRACT ▼
The various views of scholars on economic theory since the emergence of the science to date and the prospects of its development. For 400 years the political economy were installed its key components, the economy began to be seen as a system that operates through the market mechanism. A number of economic theories were wrong, which caused the stagnation of the world economy at the turn of the millennium. The attention that under current conditions is difficult and controversial process, on the one hand, the differentiation of Economics, and another - integration with other sciences. Most likely, this process will result in a unified science of society.
Keywords:political economy, the theory of economics, the fundamental economics, economic theory, neoliberal theory, retrospective perspective, the crisis of economic science
JEL: А100, В100
Article in Russian (pp. 35 - 42) | Download | Downloads :340 |
Article in Ukrainian (pp. 35 - 42) | Download | Downloads :338 |
REFERENCES ▼
Buharin N.I. (1989) Problemy teorii i praktiki socializma. M. Politizdat.
Buharin N.I. (1988) Izbrannye proizvedenija. M. Politizdat.
Hausman D. (red.) (2012) Filosofija jekonomiki. Antologija. M. Izd-vo Instituta Gajdara.
Shumpeter J.A. (2001) Istorija jekonomicheskogo analiza. T. 1. SPb. Jekonomicheskaja shkola.
Shumpeter J.A. (2008) Teorija jekonomicheskogo razvitija. Kapitalizm, socializm i demokratija. M. Jeksmo.
Iglton T. (2012) Pochemu Marks byl prav. M. Kar'era Press.
Baker D. (2012) Getting Radical with Markets. Review of Radical Political Economics. Summer
№ 4/2016
Political economyYESHCHENKO P. 1
1Institute of Sociology, NAS of Ukraine
The crisis of Ukrainian economy and how to come out of it
ABSTRACT ▼
The article reveals the basic causes of the crisis in Ukrainian economy, and its specific features. The author characterizes the influence of conducted economic policies on the socio-economic situation in the country. Formulated priority government measures that could change the current situation and prevent further deepening of the crisis.
Keywords:economic crisis, reform, economic policy, market model, socio-economic system, eco-nomic functions of the state.
JEL: J38, J45.
Article in Russian (pp. 33 - 50) | Download | Downloads :333 |
Article in Ukrainian (pp. 33 - 50) | Download | Downloads :378 |
REFERENCES ▼
1. Salen, P. (2015). Back to capitalism, in order to avoid crises. Moscow: Izd-vo Institut Gajdara [in Russian].
2. Basu, K. (2014). Beyond the Invisible Hand: Foundations of the new economics. Moscow: Izd-vo Instituta Gajdara [in Russian].
3. Piketti, T. (2015). Capital in the XXI century. Moscow: Ad Marginem Press [in Russian].
4. Korniienko, V. (1993). Public ownership as a strategic goal. Ekonomika Ukrainy – Economy of Ukraine,1, 51 [in Ukrainian].
5. Hrytsenko, A. (2015). Modern logic crisis in the context of socio-economic development. Jekonomika Ukrainy – Economy of Ukraine, 6, 18-19 [in Russian].
6. Zinov’ev, A. (1991). Where are we going. Jekonomicheskie nauki – Economic sciences, 7, 109 [in Russian].
7. Kornai, Ja. (1994). Transformational recession. Voprosy jekonomiki – Issues of economics, 3 [in Russian].
8. Simonenko, V. (2016, August. 12-18,). Strategic neglect and manipulation strategy. 2000, 32, 6-7 [in Russian].
9. Hvesik, M.A., Stepanenko, A.V. (2014). The environmental crisis in Ukraine: Social and economic consequences, and ways to overcome them. Jekonomika Ukrainy – Economy of Ukraine, 1, 75 [in Russian].
10. Stiglitz, J. (1998). Economics of Public Sector. Kyiv: Osnovy [in Ukrainian].
11. Hegel, G.V. (1999). The philosophy of law. Moscow [in Russian].
12. Thurow, L. (1999). The future of capitalism. Novosibirsk [in Russian].
№ 4/2017
Criticism and bibliographyYAREMENKO Oleh 1, YESHCHENKO P. 2
1Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine
2Institute of Sociology, NAS of Ukraine
Economic security in dangerous world: contemporary approach
Ekon. teor. 2017; 4:108-110 | |
ABSTRACT ▼
JEL: -
Article in Russian (pp. 108 - 110) | Download | Downloads :508 |
Article in Ukrainian (pp. 108 - 110) | Download | Downloads :477 |
REFERENCES ▼
-
№ 1/2018
Criticism and bibliographyYESHCHENKO P. 1, YAREMENKO Oleh 2
1Institute of Sociology, NAS of Ukraine
2Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine
Economic security in dangerous world: contemporary approach
Ekon. teor. 2018; 1:108-110 | |
ABSTRACT ▼
JEL: -
REFERENCES ▼
-
№ 4/2018
Political economyYESHCHENKO P. 1
1Institute of Sociology, NAS of Ukraine
A search of a new model for socio-economic development: a priority task of social sciences
ABSTRACT ▼
The author reveals the challenges of the present world social system, which determined the crisis of modern civilization. Particular attention is paid to the scientific substantiation of the new model of socio-economic development - a critical condition for overcoming the crisis both in each individual country and in the whole world community. Based of the study of globalization processes taking place in the modern world, the accelerated stratification of society on the rich and poor, hypertrophied development of the financial sector of the economy, the massive introduction of "digital trade", "digital money", "exchange digital currencies", etc., the article analyzes the role of social sciences in the process of changing the model of societal development.
In the author’s opinion, an integral approach to social sciences is now needed, which will become an important factor in societal development and provide a new round of society’s acceleration and renewal. The interdisciplinary approach will allow a new look at many of the traditional phenomena of social life, including such categories as capital, social justice, property and others, which will overcome the contradiction between theory and practice in modern life that is largely due to the methodological failure of the current neo-liberal theory
Keywords:crisis of civilization, global economy, digital revolution, challenges of modernity, integration approach to social sciences, model of social and economic development
JEL: O 100
Article in Russian (pp. 35 - 56) | Download | Downloads :559 |
Article in Ukrainian (pp. 35 - 56) | Download | Downloads :417 |
REFERENCES ▼
1. Alee, M. (1995). Economics as a science. Moscow: Nauka dlja obshhestva, RSUH [in Russian].
2. Alpatov, A.A. (2012). On the relationship between law and economics. Gosudarstvo i pravo – State and law, 1, 67-76 [in Russian].
3. Bolsevich, A. (2008). Economics of law: problems of occurrence and history of development. Voprosy jekonomiki – Economic issues, 12, 60-71 [in Russian].
4. Balackij, E. (2006). Economic science: new challenges of our time. Mirovaja jekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnoshenija – World economy and international relations, 1, 61-67 [in Russian].
5. Basu, K. (2014). On the other side of the invisible hand: The foundations of a new economic science. Moscow: Izd-vo Instituta Gajdara [in Russian].
6. Bourdieu, P. (2014). Forms of capital. Classic new economic sociology. Moscow: Izdatelskij dom Gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Vysshaja shkola jekonomiki [in Russian].
7. Gorts, A. (2010). Intangible knowledge: value and capital. Moscow: Izdatelskij dom Gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Vysshaja shkola jekonomiki [in Russian].
8. Hrytsenko, A.A. (2008). Economic theory in the modern world. Jekonomika Ukrainy – Economy of Ukraine, 10, 40-54 [in Russian].
9. Dolfsma, V. (2017). The failures of the state. Society, markets and rules. Moscow: Izd-vo Instituta Gajdara [in Russian].
10. Kleiner, G. (2004). Nanoeconomics. Voprosy jekonomiki – Economic issues, 12, 70-93 [in Russian].
11. Korneychuk, B. (2004). Creative well-being as a target factor. Jekonomist – Economist, 12, 76-99 [in Russian].
12. Shabanova, M. (2010). On the relationship of social and economic policy: the socio-economic perspective of analysis. Obshhestvo i jekonomika – Society and the economy, 8-9, 76-93 [in Russian].
13. Marx, K., Engels, F. (1955). Writings. Vol. 4 [in Russian].
14. Polanyi, K. (2002). The great transformation: the political and economic origins of our time. St. Petersburg: Aletejja [in Russian].
15. Rimashevskaja, N. (2004). The human potential of Russia and the problems of 'population savings'. Rossijskij jekonomicheskij zhurnal – Russian economic journal, 9-10, 23-40 [in Russian].
16. Rodina, G.M. (2006). The evolution of views on property relations; from the old to the new economy. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Ser. 6. Ekonomika – Moscow University Bulletin. Ser. 6. Economy, 4, 3-24 [in Russian].
17. Sakajja, T. (1999). The value created by knowledge, or history of the future. New post-industrial wave in the West: an anthology. Moscow [in Russian].
18. Tarasevich, V.N. (2017). A quarter of a century of independence of Ukraine: current contexts and imperatives of socio-economic reforms. Jekonomika Ukrainy – Economy of Ukraine, 8, 14-28 [in Russian].
19. Hubiev, K. (2006). On the problems of scientific methodology. Obshhestvo i jekonomika – Society and the economy, 3, 47-53 [in Russian].
20. Jedvinsson, L., Mjeloun, M. (1999). Intellectual capital. Determination of the true value of the company. New post-industrial wave in the West: an anthology. Moscow: Academia [in Russian].
21. Iaremenko, O. (2016). Contradictory unity of economic efficiency and social justice as a factor in the functioning and evolution of economic systems. Ekon. teor. – Economic theory, 4, 19-32 [in Ukrainian].
№ 1/2020
Political economyYESHCHENKO P. 1
1Institute of Sociology, NAS of Ukraine
Ukraine in the debt trap of the IMF
ABSTRACT ▼
The article reveals the IMF lending policy towards Ukraine in the context of eco-nomic reforms. Based on the analysis of a large array of statistical and empirical materials, the author proves the incapacity and failure of radical economic re-forms under the auspices of the IMF in Ukraine and the development of negative processes in this country, which lead to its transformation into a raw material ap-pendage of the "golden billion" countries. The IMF's lending policy has contributed to the growth of the Ukraine’s external and internal debt and the introduction of foreign capital in all spheres of its life.
Reforms in our country under the Washington Consensus are carried out in the interests of foreign capital and are reduced to their structural restructuring through marketing, privatization, liberalization and deregulation. All this leads to deindus-trialization of the national economy, opening-up to foreign capital, reduced social expenditures, and weaken state regulation of the labor market. Ukraine, from its own experience becomes increasingly convinced that curing its economy with the IMF's "assistance" is holding this country’s own economic growth and is accompanied increased inequity in income sharing.
IMF programs cost millions of people their jobs, denying them access to adequate health care, education systems and decent housing. Complying with IMF requirements leads to further collapse of our economy, total impoverishment, looting of the remnants of Ukrainian state property by foreign oligarchs and foreign TNCs, and the transition of our most important wealth - land - into the ownership of agricultural holdings. In order to free Ukraine from financial and credit dependence, it is proposed to encourage the national economy through a rapid growth of wages and pensions, which would increase the purchasing power of the households and revive business activities
Keywords:macroeconomic indicators, external debt, domestic debt, debt trap, government liabilities, dollarization, cost of labor as a commodity, subsidies, neoliberal policy
JEL: O11, O19
Article in English (pp. 19 - 36) |
Article in Russian (pp. 19 - 36) | Download | Downloads :411 |
Article in Ukrainian (pp. 19 - 36) | Download | Downloads :414 |
REFERENCES ▼
1. Babenko, M. (2019, May 14). Pay back, homeland. How Ukraine will pay a record volume of public debt payments. Focus. Retrieved from
focus.ua/economics/428903-otdaj-dolg-rodina.html [in Russian].
2. Vlasjuk, V. (2019, May 7). The trajectory of Ukrainian GDP: is it possible to change it. Jekonomicheskaja pravda – Economic truth. Retrieved from
www.epravda.com.ua/rus/columns/2019/05/7/647578/2 [in Russian].
3. Vlasjuk, V. (2018, November 17-23). Debt burden. Zerkalo nedeli. Ukraina – The mirror of the week. Ukraine, 44. Retrieved from
zn.ua/business/dolgovoe-bremya-300445_.html [in Russian].
4. Glushkov, V.M. (2012). OGAS (General State Automated System for collect-ing and processing information for accounting, planning and managing the national economy of the USSR). Retrieved from
www.warandpeace.ru/ru/analysis/view/72058/ [in Russian].
5. Hlushchenko, O.V. (2016). The formation of financial architecture to ensure national welfare. Kharkiv: KhNU imeni V.N. Karazina [in Ukrainian].
6. Danilishin, B. (2016, December 26). Cooperation with the IMF: problems and prospects. Zerkalo nedeli. Ukraina – The mirror of the week. Ukraine, 45. Retrieved from
gazeta.zn.ua/macrolevel/sotrudnichestvo-s-mvf-problemy-i-perspektivy-_.html [in Russian].
7. Korablin, S. (2019, March 23). Financial instability. Zerkalo nedeli. Ukraina – The mirror of the week. Ukraine, 11. Retrieved from
zn.ua/macrolevel/finansovaya-nestabilnost-312549_.html [in Russian].
8. Korpan, T. (2018, November 7). Ukrainians in ratings and numbers: The rich get richer, the poor get poorer. GOLOS. UA – VOICE.UA. Retrieved from
golos.ua/i/646421 [in Russian].
9. Marx, K. (1955). The process of capital production. In Criticism of political economy (vol. 1, book 1). Moscow: Gospolitizdat [in Russian].
10. Skljarov, R. (2016, November 5). How to bridge the split between elites and people: the path from below. Zerkalo nedeli. Ukraina – The mirror of the week. Ukraine, 41. Retrieved from
gazeta.zn.ua/macrolevel/kak-preodolet-raskol-mezhdu-elitami-i-narodom-put-snizu-_.html [in Russian].
11. Smit, A. (1993). A study on the nature and causes of the wealth of peoples. Book 1. Moscow: Nauka [in Russian].
12. Stiglitz, J. (2003). Globalization and Its Discontents. Kyiv: Akademiia [in Russian].