Articles by : Hrymaliuk Andrii № 2/2018
Political economyZVIERIAKOV Mykhailo I.1, HRYMALIUK Andrii 2
1Odessa National University of Economics
2Odessa National Economic University
Odessa school and the present
ABSTRACT ▼
The scientific traditions of the Odessa School of Economic Thought, which was created by Professor A.K. Pokrytan, can play a significant role in the further development of the logico-historical approach to the analysis of economic development. One of the most important methodological foundations of the Odessa school is the consistent delineation of the formal and the real sides of the transformation processes. The main purpose of the article is to outline in the most general terms the opportunities that the methodology of the Odessa school opens up for the analysis of the transformation processes unfolding today in the world economy and, first of all, in the most developed countries.
The most important result of the study is connected with the conclusion that at the present time the process of the movement of a highly developed economy is developing not just towards the next technological order, but towards a new technological method of production. This tendency can explain much in the modern world, including the turbulence that we see today in Western society. Modern highly developed society is still only nominally post-industrial, and there has yet to be a process of real post-industrial transformation in the future. The latter can be very painful for it, since it is connected with the mass expulsion of people from the sphere of material production and management. Thus, the main conclusion is that the contradiction between formal and real transformation, which at the end of the 20th century determined the historical fate of Soviet society, in the 21st century begins to exacerbate now in Western society, which enters into a process of real post-industrial transformation.
Keywords: logical-historical approach, Odessa school, economic theory, real post-industrial transformation, technological way of production, highly developed economy
JEL: B 41
| Article in Russian (pp. 5 - 21) | Download | Downloads :648 |
| Article in Ukrainian (pp. 5 - 21) | Download | Downloads :584 |
REFERENCES ▼
1. Bogdanov, A.A., Skvorcov-Stepanov, I.I. (2011). The course of political economy pre-capitalist era. Moscow: Librocom [in Russian].
2. Heyets, V.M., Hrytsenko, A.A. (2013). Exit from the crisis (Reflections on the actual in connection with the read). Ekonomika Ukrainy – Economy of Ukraine, 6, 4-19 [in Russian].
3. Goldstone, J.A. (2014). Why Europe? The rise of the West in world history. 1500-1850. Moscow: Publishing house of Gaidar Institute [in Russian].
4. Hrytsenko, A.A. (2005). The development of forms of exchange, value and money. Kiev: Osnova [in Russian].
5. Hrytsenko, A.A. (2011). Methodological basis of modernization of Ukraine. Ekonomika Ukrainy – Economy of Ukraine, 2, 4-21 [in Russian].
6. Hrytsenko, A.A. (2016). The economy of Ukraine on the way to inclusive development. Ekonomika Ukrainy – Economy of Ukraine, 2, 45-63 [in Russian].
7. Hrytsenko, A.A. (2017). Logico-historical bases of cardinal economic changes and transition to reconstructive development. Ekonomika Ukrainy – Economy of Ukraine, 5-6, 39-57 [in Russian].
8. Zhdanova, L.L. (2014). Reproduction and accumulation of capital: theory, methodology, economic policy. Odesa: Astroprint [in Ukrainian].
9. Mason, P. (2016). Post-capitalism: a journey through our future. Moscow: Ad Marginem [in Russian].
10. Zvieriakov, M.I., Zhdanova, L.L., Sharah, O.S. (2017). New industrialization as a model of economic development of Ukraine. Odesa: Astroprint [in Ukrainian].
11. Rozenberg, N., Birdcell, L. (2015). How the West became rich. Economic transformation of the industrial world. Moscow: IRISPEN, Socium [in Russian].
12. Standing, G. (2014). Precariat. A new dangerous class. Moscow: Ad Marginem [in Russian].
13. Toynbee, A. (2010). Comprehension of history. Moscow: Iris Press [in Russian].
14. Schwab, K. (2017). The fourth industrial revolution. Moscow: EKSMO [in Russian].
15. Feenstra, R.C. (2015). Advanced International Trade: Theory and Evidence. Princeton: Princ. Univ. Press.
16. Landau, A. (2012). The International Trade System. New York: Routledge.
17. Suranovic, S. (2015). International Trade: Theory and Policy. Washington: Saylor Foundation.
№ 1/2019
Anniversaries and memorable datesZVIERIAKOV Mykhailo I.1, HRYMALIUK Andrii 2
1Odessa National University of Economics
2Odessa National Economic University
Tributes to the scientist
| Ekon. teor. 2019; 1:116-118 | |
ABSTRACT ▼
JEL:
| Article in Russian (pp. 116 - 118) | Download | Downloads :442 |
| Article in Ukrainian (pp. 116 - 118) | Download | Downloads :426 |
REFERENCES ▼
№ 2/2022
Political economyZVIERIAKOV Mykhailo I.1, HRYMALIUK Andrii 2
1Odessa National University of Economics
2Odessa National Economic University
Theoretical fundamentals of political-economic analysis of public governance and administration
ABSTRACT ▼
The legal form of public administration is analyzed, its internal economic content related to material production relations and the objective economic laws immanent in them is investigated.
The research methodology is based on the demarcation of the structure and dynamics of the political-economic system, which is consistently carried out by the Odesa School of Economic Theory.
It is shown that the political and economic content of public management and administration always has a concrete-historical character. The modern standard of an effective political and economic system is the "mirror symmetry" of its structural and dynamic dependencies. Such "mirror" symmetry is achieved only when the "top-down" dynamic dependence includes all structural levels of the political-economic system in sequence: public management and administration - objective production relations - productive forces of society. If one of these three levels falls out of the "chain" of dynamic dependencies, the system ceases to meet the political and economic requirements of modern development and is unable to find adequate answers to historical challenges.
In the modern state-capitalist model of managed development, dynamic dependence is able to cover all three structural levels in the process of consciously using the objective economic laws of capitalism for the development of productive forces, including public management and administration.
The practical significance of the research results is related to the justification of the objective necessity for Ukraine of a state-capitalist model of managed development, in which public management and administration are aimed at the conscious use of objective economic laws for the development of productive forces.
Keywords:political-economic analysis; public management and administration; state capitalism; managed development; liberal model of governance; spontaneous development
JEL: B41
| Article in Russian (pp. 5 - 28) | Download | Downloads :142 |
| Article in Ukrainian (pp. 5 - 28) | Download | Downloads :143 |
REFERENCES ▼
1. Bodrov, V. H. (2016). Information economics and public administration: theoreticalapplied aspects. Naukovyi zbirnyk Universytetu mytnoi spravy ta finansiv– Scientific collection of the University of Customs and Finance. Dnipro: University of Customs and Finance, 2 (15), 7-16 [in Ukrainian].
2. Hrytsenko, A. A. (2017). Logical and historical foundations of radical economic changes and the transition to reconstructive development. Ekonomika Ukrainy – Economy of Ukraine, 5, 39-57 [in Ukrainian].
3. Hrytsenko, A. A. (2021). Scientific principles of complementarity research of the interrelation of information-digital, economic and social transformations. In Complementarity of information-digital and socio-economic transformations as a condition of stable development of society (p. 164-182). Institute for economics and forecasting, NAS of Ukraine.Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
4. Zvieriakov, M. I., Hrymaliuk, A. V. (2018). Odesa school and modernity. Ekon. teor. – Economictheory, 2, 5-21.
doi.org/10.15407/etet2018.02.005 [in Ukrainian].
5. Zvieriakov, M. I. (2018). Theoretical paradigm of sustainable development and Ukrainian realities. Ekonomika Ukrainy – Economy of Ukraine, 10, 10-31.
doi.org/10.15407/economyukr.2018.10.010 [in Ukrainian].
6. Zvieriakov, M. I., Hrymaliuk, A. V. (2019). Economic theory, public policy and
public administration. Ekonomika Ukrainy – Economy of Ukraine, 11-12, 3-33 [in Ukrainian].
7. Zvieriakov, M. I. (2020). Economic development in the era of "digital capitalism". Ekonomika Ukrainy – Economy of Ukraine, 8, 3-23.
doi.org/10.15407/economyukr.2020.08.003 [in Ukrainian].
8. Zvieriakov, M. I. (2021). The scientific heritage of AK is covered in the light of modern problems economic theory. Ekonomika Ukrainy – Economy of Ukraine, 1, 84-92.
doi.org/10.15407/economyukr.2021.01.084 [in Ukrainian].
9. Tarasevich, V. M. (2015). On the state-capitalist conditionality of innovation development of the national economy. Ekonomika Ukrainy – Economy of Ukraine, 11, 16-31, 12. 10-25.
10. Bardhan, P. (2018). On the Concept of Power in Economics. Economics and Politics, 3, 265-277.
doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0343.1991.tb00050.x
11. Bocage, D. (2019). General Economic Theory of Fracois Perroux. Lahman: University Press of America.
12. Clegg, S. (2007). The Theory of Power and Organization. London: Routledge.
13. Dugger, W. M. (2018). Corporate Power. New York: Greenwood Press.
14. Enfu Cheng. (2019). The Creation of Value by Living Labor: A Normative and Empirical Studies. Vol. 2. London and Istanbul: Canut Press.
15. Galbraith, J. K. (1956). American Capitalism: The Concept of Countervailing Power. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co.
16. Galbraith, J. K. (1967). New Industrial State. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co.
17. Galbraith, J. K. (1973). Economics and the Public Purpose. Easton: Houghton Mifflin Co.
18. Galbraith, J. K. (1984). The Anatomy of Power. Bungay, Suffolk: Richard Clay Ltd.
19. Habermas, Ju. (1962 trans. 1989). The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
20. Habermas, Ju. (1976). Legitimation Crisis. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
21. Habermas Ju. (1984).Theory of Communication Action1: Reasonand the Rationalization of Society. Boston, Mass.: Beacon Press.
22. Lukes, S. (2019). Power: A Radical View. London: Macmillan.
23. Papandreou, A. (1994). Externality and Institutions. Oxford: Claredon Press.
24. Parsons, T. (1951). The Social System. London: Routledge.
25. Qunhui Huang. (2018). China's Industrialization Process. Singapore: Springer Singapore.
doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3665-1
26. Rothschild Kurt W. (1971). Power in economics : selected readings. Penguin, [Harmondsworth, Eng.]
27. Russell, B. (2020). Power. London: Routledge.
28. Schmitt, C. (2018). Legality and Legitimacy. Durham: Duke Univ. Press.
29. Schutz E. (1995). Markets and Power. Journal of Economic Issues, XXIX (4), 1147-1170.
doi.org/10.1080/00213624.1995.11505745
30. Takata, Y. (2018). Power Theory of Economics. New York: St. Martins Press.
31. Weber, M. (1921) 2019. Economy and Society: A New Translation. Harvard: Univ. Press.
doi.org/10.4159/9780674240827
English
Ukrainian 
