In the article, the institutional aspects of shadow economy in Ukraine emergence and development have been analyzed. The genesis of shadow economy has been shown: from one of the branches of institutionally pluralistic system – to a sustained "institutional trap". The author proves that the definitive role in the formation of shadow economy in Ukraine of has been played by the emergence and distribution of transition rent, which emerges, when the transformation of the institutions of redistribution significantly leaves behind the construction of the institutions of structural mobility of the economy. The article shows systemic consequences of the spread of shadow economy in the macroeconomic sphere, which include low effectiveness of the policy of economic modernization and high risks of negative tradeoffs from standard instruments’ usage. The phenomenon of large social groups’ resistance to the reforms arises. The opportunistic behavior of agents erodes the benefits of a market model, while institutional failures distort the functions of agents in economic system, causing its general disfunctionality, and "freezing" its transitional state. The author considers overcoming shadow economy in Ukraine a the way out of an "institutional trap", based on strengthening the institutional framework of structural adaptation of the economy, aimed to reduce the opportunities to obtain transition rent and to create the conditions for its convertation into fairly distributed legal factor income. The author argues that, based on the development of network economy, Industry 4.0 and their diffusion into traditional sectors of the economy, new economic elites emerge, motivated for transparent economic activities. At the same time increases the number of agents obtaining negative tradeoffes from being in the shadow segment of the economy. Hence, the institutional "lock-in" of shadow economy has been unlocked, and the "critical mass" of agents, motivated to overcome it, grows.
Keywords: shadow economy, institutional trap, institutional competition, overcoming shadow economy, economic modernization
1. Berezhnyi, Ya.V., Zhalilo, Ya.A., Pokryshka, D.S. (2013). The policy of national projects' realization: development perspectives in Ukraine. Ekonomika Ukrainy – Economy of Ukraine, 10, 32-44 [in Ukrainian].
2. Burroni, L. & Crouch, C. (2008). The Territorial Governance of the Shadow Economy. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 1, 1-16. doi:
https://doi.org/10.1068/c0713p">doi.org/10.1068/c0713p">https://doi.org/10.1068/c0713p
3. Coase, R.H. (1988). The Firme, the Market and the Law. Chicago-London: The University of Chicago Press.
4. Yeshchenko, P.S. (2017). Ukrainian Great Depression and how to get out of it? Kyiv: Dakor [in Russian].
5. Evans, M., Syrett, S., Williams, C. (2006). Informal economic activities and deprived neighbourhoods. London: Department of Communities and Local Government.
6. Fomina, M.V. (2014). Corruption and shadow relations: the aspect of political economy. Ekonomichnyi nobelivskyi visnyk – Nobel economic herald, 1, 471-478 [in Ukrainian].
7. Schneider, Friedrich & Williams, Colin C. (2013). The Shadow Economy. The Institute of Economic Affairs. London in association with Profile Books Ltd. doi:
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139542289">doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139542289">https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139542289
8. Gallin, D. (2001). Propositions on trade unions and informal employment in time of globalization, Antipode, 19, 531-549. doi:
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8330.00197">doi.org/10.1111/1467-8330.00197">https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8330.00197
9. Halchynskyi, A. (2001). Contradictions of the reforms in the context of civilizational process. Kyiv: Ukrainski propilei, 143 [in Ukrainian].
10. Kerber, W., Vanberg, V. (1995). Competition among Institutions: Evolution within Constraints. Competition among Institutions. L., NY: Macmillan and St. Martin's Press, 35-64. doi:
https://doi.org/10.1007/9781349242627_2">doi.org/10.1007/9781349242627_2">https://doi.org/10.1007/9781349242627_2
11. Koretska, S.O. (2011). Shadow economy: consequences and methods of overcoming. Investytsii: praktyka ta dosvid – Investments: practice and experience, 20, 17-18 [in Ukrainian].
12. Kyndzerskyi, Yu.V. (2016). Ukraine: oligarchic trap of development in the context of institutional changes. Belorusskiy ekonomicheskiy zhurnal – Belarusian Economic Journal, 4, 17-36 [in Russian].
13. Lysenko, Yu., Stryzhak, H. (2014). Modern paradigm of institutional traps. Ekon. teor. – Economic theory, 4, 48-60 [in Ukrainian].
14. Mandybura, V.O. (2017). Corruption: the institutional sence and overcoming mechanisms. Kyiv: Parlamentske vydavnytstvo [in Ukrainian].
15. North, D. (1997). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Moscow, Fond ekonomicheskoy knigi Nachala [in Russian].
16. Pejovich, S. (1996). The Market for Institutions Versus the Strong Hand of the State: the Case of Eastern Europe. Economic Institutions, Markets and Competition. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 111-126.
17. Polterovych, V.M. (1999). Institutional traps and economic reforms. Jekonomika i matematicheskie metody – Economics and the Mathematical Methods, 35, 2 [in Russian].
18. Polterovych, V. (2004). Institutional traps: is there the way out? Obshhestvennye nauki i sovremennost' – Social sciences and modernity, 3, 5-16 [in Russian].
19. Predborskyi, V.A. (2005). Overcoming of shadow economy in the context of transformational processes. The issues of theory and methodology. Kyiv: Kondor [in Ukrainian].
20. Sukharev, O.S. (2014). The theory of dysfunction of institutions and economic systems. Zhurnal ekonomicheskoy teorii – Russian Journal of Economic Theory, 1, 27-40 [in Russian].
21. Varnalii, Z.S. (2006) Shadow economy: essence, specific features the ways of legalization. Kyiv: NISD [in Ukrainian].
22. Vashkiv, O., Poda, A. (2010). Entrepreneurship as an subject and an object of an institutional trap. Visnyk TNEU – TNEU Bulletin, 4, 98-110 [in Ukrainian].
23. Zhalilo, Ya.A. (2008). On the ways of debt financing of public investment projects. Stratehichni priorytety – Strategic Priority, 1, 66-73 [in Ukrainian].
24. Zhalilo, Ya.A. (2016). Specific features of government economic policy realization in modern trends of social development. Ekon. teor. – Economic theory, 1, 39-52 [in Ukrainian].
25. Zhalilo, Ya.A., Smenkovskyi, A.Iu. (2001). The strategy of realization of investment potential of Ukraine. Stratehichna panorama – Strategic panorama, 3-4, 69-75 [in Ukrainian].