№ 2019/1
Political economyTARASEVYCH Viktor M.1
1National Metallurgical Academy of Ukraine (Dnipro)
Ancient eastern civilizations and types of social evolution: theoretical summary and methodological remarks
ABSTRACT ▼
This article concludes the first stage of studies of the universe and social evolution, whose materials were published earlier. The author considers the trinitarianism of the first civilizations of the East, the dominant affiliation of their qualitative attributes to the Eastern, Middle and Western types of social evolution. On this basis, four subtypes of the eastern type of social evolution are distinguished: the Eastern (Ancient Egypt), the Eastern Middle (Ancient China), the Middle (Ancient India) and the Western (Ancient Mesopotamia) ones. Medianism is represented as a universal culture and the tri-unity of primary origins integrating its own identical (in the centrality), its own different (in the intermediate), and the other’s different (in the focus and conciliarity).
Since the universe is not only dual, but also triple, the author justifies ontological, epistemological, axiological and praxiological prerequisites for the possibility and necessity of the threealectic as a process and the result of the dialectics. In this regard, a person is viewed as a controversial trinity of natural, social and personal principles, whose substantial foundation (man) is a tri-unity of genes, memes and iposes. The paper shows the fractality and increasing complexity of the nano-, micro-, meso-, macro- and mega-levels of Man.
Threealectic prospects for the development of fundamental economic science are indicated, including the actualization of the potential of the threealectic, nonclassical trilateral contradictions, the contrarian three-unity, apophatic methodology, the tripartite nature of truth, etc., filling the human dimension of the supercomplex self-organizing economic system with real content, and determining the economic significance of natural, social and personal constituent of the man, the unes, genes, memes and iposes.
Keywords: trinitarian, evolution, type, subtype, Middle, Eastern, Western, universal of culture, centrality, intermediate, center, threealectic, person, personal, natural, social, unes, genes, memes, iposes
JEL: А12, B40, P50
| Article in Russian (pp. 43 - 70) | Download | Downloads :500 |
| Article in Ukrainian (pp. 43 - 70) | Download | Downloads :471 |
REFERENCES ▼
1. Confucius. (2017). Lun-Yu. Conversations and opinions. Retrieved from http//filisof.historic.ru/books/item/f00/s00/z0000583/st000.shtml/ [in Russian].
2. Gaidenko, P. (2009). To the problem of the formation of the new European science. Voprosy filosofii – Questions of philosophy, 5, 80-92 [in Russian].
3. Karsavin, L.P. (1993). Compositions. Moscow: Raritet [in Russian].
4. Kuraev, A. (2010). Excessive dogma. Academy of Trinitarianism. Moscow. El. No. 77-6567, pub. 16078 [in Russian].
5. Lossky, V.N. (1995). On the issue of the procession of the Holy Spirit. In Lossky V.N. In the image and likeness. Moscow: Publishing house of the Holy Vladimir brotherhood [in Russian].
6. Melnyk, L.G (2015). Threealectic bases of management of development of economic systems. Sumy: University book [in Russian].
7. Popkov, Yu.V. (Ed.). (2010). Eurasian world: values, constants, self-organization. Novosibirsk: Nonparel [in Russian].
8. Rauschenbach, B.V. (1993). The logic of the trinity. Voprosy filosofii – Questions of philosophy, 3, 63-70 [in Russian].
9. Stepin, V.S. (2011). History and philosophy of science: Textbook for graduate students and applicants for the scientific degree of Candidate of Science. Moscow: Academic Project; Trista [in Russian].
10. Tarasevich, V.N. (2017). Fundamental economic science: the universumic of content and development. Dnepr: PME Economics [in Russian].
11. Zadorozhny, G.V., Zadorozhnaya, O.G. (2015). Human-Economic Economics: Problems of Methodology. Kharkov: VNNOO named after V.I. Vernadsky [in Russian].
English
Ukrainian 
