Clarification of the laws of harmonious ordering of the social economy system was largely carried out in the depth of European civilization in the course of the evolution of fundamental scientific knowledge. Thus, the synergy of intellectual efforts of the representatives of classical German philosophy, English political economy and French social doctrines became a catalyst and, at the same time, a fertile cultural ground for the establishment of civic institutions of modern times.
Transcendent understanding of civilizational values as a system of social relations is to be carried out by political economy – the science of economic laws. Such a mission of economic science was defined during the formation of its classic research line as the logic of the Middle Way. However, modern economic theory in content remains traditional. It does not conceive its object in a single space-time coordinate system or recognize the economic value (economic good) as its own object and the basis of social relations. For that reason, the most important concepts of civilizational heritage are considerably distorted.
Freedom, equality, and brotherhood, which are considered to be political in origin, are the most important universal values that have been promulgated by the European community in modern times. However, the crystallization of the values of freedom, equality, and brotherhood in their syncretic unity is initially carried out in the depths of political economy. In recent times, each of them has been taken as one of the traditional methodological branches of economic science. Thus, the problem of freedom is key to the liberal-margin economic doctrine that today ideologically feeds educational courses in economics. In order to modernize the training courses, experts propose to restore their connection with the provisions of the authentic doctrine of liberal marginalization, and with the conceptual system of L. von Mises. This rethinking makes the logic of functioning of the modern market economy and the basic principles of neoliberal policy more transparent and at the same time shows the imperfection of liberal doctrine in comparison with the original scientific provisions of classical economic thought.
Keywords: harmonious ordering of the economic system, methodology of political economy, liberal ideology, freedom of economic choice, European civilizational values
1. Artomova, T. (2017). European values: traditional concepts in the era of global market transformations. Ekon. teor. – Economic theory, 4, 5-31 [In Ukrainian].
2. Artomova, T. (2011). Methodological anatomy of the global financial and economic crisis. Ekon. teor. – Economic theory, 2, 16-33 [In Ukrainian].
3. Artomova, T. (2006). Cost and price: the logical-historical process of shaping. Kiev: Osnova [In Russian].
4. Acemoglu, D., Robinson, J. (2013). Politics or economics? Traps standard solutions. Voprosy jekonomiki – Economic issues, 12, 4-28 [In Russian].
5. Bakunin, M.A. (1990). Corruption. – About Machiavelli. – The development of statehood (preface to the publication of N.M. Pirumova). Voprosy jekonomiki – Economic issues, 12, 53-66 [In Russian].
6. Hrytsenko. A. The structure of the market transformation of the inversion type. Jekonomika Ukrainy – Economy of Ukraine, 1, 4-10 [In Russian].
7. Galbraith, J. (1979). Economic theories and goals of society. Moscow: Progress [In Russian].
8. Jacobs, G. (2018). The political economy of neoliberalism and illiberal democracy. Mir peremen. – World of change, 3, 26-36 [In Russian].
9. Joseph, S. Nye, Jr. (2017). Will the liberal world order survive? Rossija v globalnoj politike – Russia in Global Affairs, 2, 72-82 [In Russian].
10. The law of reproduction of inequality is established. Editorial Article (2017). Jekspert. – Expert, 38, 13 [In Russian].
11. Kapeljushnikov, R.I. (2019a). Contra paninstitutionalism. Part I. Voprosy jekonomiki – Economic issues, 7, 119-146 [In Russian].
12. Kapeljushnikov, R.I. (2019б). Contra paninstitutionalism. Part II. Voprosy jekonomiki – Economic issues, 8, 98-126 [In Russian].
13. Chiesa, G. (2018). Go beyond the limits of the "cash card". Reading Gramsci today. Scattered notes on intellectuals and cultural organizations. Svobodnaja mysl. – Free thought, 6, 17-32 [In Russian].
14. McConnell, C.R., Brju, S.L. (1992). Economics: Principles, problems and politics: in 2 volumes. Moscow: Respublika [In Russian].
15. Macron, E. (2019). "Capitalism has degraded and gone crazy". Retrieved from
www.ridus.ru/news/306110 [In Russian].
16. Marshall, A. (1993). Principles of economic science: in 3 vol. Moscow: Izdatelskaja gruppa "Progress" [In Russian].
17. Mises, L. von (1993). Bureaucracy. Planned chaos. Anti-capitalist mentality. Moscow: Delo [In Russian].
18. Mises, L. von (1994). Socialism. Economic and sociological analysis. Moscow: "Catallaxy" [In Russian].
19. Mises, L. von (2000). Human Activities: A Treatise on Economic Theory. Moscow: OAO "NPO "Jekonomika"" [In Russian].
20. Milanovic, B. (2014). Global inequality. A new approach for the era of globalization. Moscow: Izd-vo Instituta Gajdara [In Russian].
21. Niblett, R. (2018). The retreat of liberalism. Rossija v globalnoj politike – Russia in Global Affairs, 2, 83-93 [In Russian].
22. New Inequalities - New Conflicts: Ways to Overcome (2017). Abstracts and speeches of the participants of the 3rd Congress of the Sociological Association of Ukraine (Kharkiv, October 12-13, 2017). Kharkiv: Sociological Association of Ukraine, VN Kharkiv National University Karazin [In Ukrainian].
23. Nuti, D.M. (2018). The rise, fall and future of socialism. Mir peremen. – World of change, 41-55 [In Russian].
24. Piketti, T. (2015). Capital in the 21st century. Moscow: AD Marginem Press [In Ukrainian].
25. Sachs, J. (2012). The price of civilization. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo Instituta Gajdara [In Russian].
26. Samuelson, P.A., Nordhaus V.D. (2000). Economy. Moscow: Laboratorija Bazovyh Znanij [In Russian].
27. Huerta, de Soto J. (2010). "Human activity" by Ludwig von Mises as a textbook on economic theory. Voprosy jekonomiki – Economic issues, 11, 62-82. doi:
https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2010-11-62-82">doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2010-11-62-82">https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2010-11-62-82 [In Russian].
28. Fukuyama, F. (2019). Socialism must return. Mir peremen. – World of change, 1, 8-10 [In Russian].
English
Ukrainian 
