| . |
English
Ukrainian
|
| HOME |
№ 2021/4
1State Organization “Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine”
Socialization and its success in the model of achieving the development of the social world
| Ekon. teor. 2021; 4:5-40 | https://doi.org/10.15407/etet2021.04.005 |
ABSTRACT ▼
The article presents the results of the analysis of disproportion on the materials characterizing the economy and society of Ukraine, which allowed us to conclude about the formation of a trap of modernization, due to which transformational changes did not achieve the desired result. As a phenomenon, it is due to the relevant processes in society due to its lag in mastering the accumulation of exogenous in the absence of endogenous nature of the experience of the subject of modernization.
To resolve contradictions and overcome the gap, it is necessary to implement a model of social life, which will reduce the disproportion.
The author's model of social world development is proposed, which is based on the interaction between the dialectical nature of such fundamental social processes as internalization, exteriorization, subjectivation, objectification, innovation, participating in the reformatting and development of the social world. Socialization is considered both as a process of the comprehension of objective reality by consciousness, and as a process of comprehension of dynamics and structure of development of the surrounding social world. The common and different processes of transformation of the Middle Ages and modernity according to the social criterion are presented and the role of socialization and social innovations in the long-term reformatting of the social world is shown. In the case of their success in social construction, there should really be a symmetry between objective and subjective reality. The socialization of the subject and the social innovation generated by it in understanding the development of the social world as a necessary condition for the success of its transformation in the long run are considered. The sufficient conditions are the necessary socialization of the object, objective reality, economic relations, capital, and the way of interaction between subject and object. This spectrum will be the subject of further research by the author
Keywords:welfare state, economy, society, socialization, social reality, modernization, economization
JEL: A 130, I 310
| Article in Russian (pp. 5 - 40) |
| Article in Ukrainian (pp. 5 - 40) |
REFERENCES ▼
2. Beck, U. (2003). The Cosmopolitan Society and Its Enemies. Zhurnal Sotsiologii i Sotsialnoy Antropologii – The Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology, 1, 24 [in Russian].
3. Berger, P., & Luckmann, T. (1995). The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. Moscow: Medium [in Russian].
4. Heyets, V. M. (2013). About the future of the welfare state. Mir Peremen – The World of Transformations, 4, 102-115 [in Russian]
5. Heyets, V. M. (2014). Only an effective and strong state can oppose monopoly. Mir Peremen – The World of Transformations, 1, 29-34 [in Russian].
6. Heyets, V. M. (2011). Socialization institutions in Ukraine and EU countries: tendencies of development and key differences. Ukr. socìum – Ukrainian society, 2, 7-34; 3, 7-34. doi.org/10.15407/socium2011.02.007; doi.org/10.15407/socium2011.03.007 [in Ukrainian].
7. Heyets, V. M. (2020а). Socialization and social innovations in economic development. Ekon. teor. – Economic theory, 4, 5-24. doi.org/10.15407/etet2020.04.005 [in Ukrainian].
8. Heyets, V. M. (2020б). The phenomenon of instability is a challenge to economic development. Kyiv: Akademperiodyka. doi.org/10.15407/akademperiodyka.403.456 [in Ukrainian].
9. Heyets, V. M. (2021). Socialization in social transformations of long-term character. Ekonomika Ukrainy – Economy of Ukraine, 9, 9-17. doi.org/10.15407/economyukr.2021.09.003 [in Ukrainian].
10. Hryhorenko, Yu. (October 21, 2020). Elusive Black: The story of the launch of a new iron ore deposit. Retrieved 31.05.2021 from gmk.center/ua/posts/nevlovimij-black-istoriya-zapusku-novogo-rodovishha-zaliznoi-rudi/ [in Ukrainian].
11. Grinin, L. E. (2017). From the Malthusian trap to the modernization trap. Predicting the dynamics of political instability in the countries of the world-system periphery. In the book. Projects and risks of the future / otv. ed. Akaev A.A., Korotaev A.V. et al. Moscow: Krasand [in Russian].
12. Hrytsenko, A. A. (ed.) (2013). Hierarchy and networks in the institutional architectonics of economic systems: monograph / [Artomova T.I., Hrytsenko A.A., Krychevska T.A. and etc.]; ed. Corresponding Member NAS of Ukraine A.A. Hrytsenko; NASU Institute for Economics and Forecasting. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
13. Gurevich, A. Ja. (1984). Categories of medieval culture. 2nd ed., Revised and enlarged. Moscow: Iskusstvo. Retrieved from www.al24.ru/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/A._Ya._Gurevich_Kategorii_srednevekovoy_kulturyi._2-e_izd._ispr._i_dop._M._Iskusstvo_1984.pdf [in Russian].
14. Efremov, D. (March 11, 2021). The perfect sword is already in the hands of the blacksmith. China is developing a "new development philosophy". Retrieved 14.03.2021 from zn.ua/international/idealnyj-mech-uzhe-v-rukakh-kuznetsa-.html [in Russian].
15. Kolodko, Hzh. (2020). The economy of the new pragmatism: identity, purpose, methods. Ekonomika Ukrainy – Economy of Ukraine, 2, 3-23. doi.org/10.15407/economyukr.2020.02.003 [in Ukrainian].
16. Libanova, E. M. (2014). Inequality in Ukrainian society: origins and modernity. Ekonomika Ukrainy – Economy of Ukraine, 3, 18[in Ukrainian].
17. Mason, P. (2016). Post Capitalism: A Guide to Our Future. Moscow: Ad Marginem Press [in Russian].
18. Pavlenko, Yu. V. (2002). The history of world civilization. Philosophical analysis. Kyiv. Retrieved from www.twirpx.com/file/1820864/ [in Russian].
19. Skokova, L. (2017). Measuring cultural participation: Ukrainian and international experience. In the book. Ukrainian society: monitoring of social change: coll. scientific works, 4 (18). Kyiv: In-t sotsiolohii NAN Ukrainy [in Ukrainian].
20. Sorokin, P. (2000). Social and cultural dynamics. St. Petersburg: Russian Christian Humanitarian Institute Publishing House [in Russian].
21. Chang, Ha-Joon. (2018).23 Things They Don’t Tell You About Capitalism. Kyiv: Nash format [in Ukrainian].
22. Jurev, A. (2018). I see everything, I hear everything, I will tell everyone everything. Jekspert – Expert, 44 [in Russian].
23. Ferguson, N. (2017). The Sguare and the Tower. Network, Hierarchies and the Struggle for Global Power. London: Allen Lane an imprint of Books.
24. Heyets, V. (Jun 2019). SocialQualityin a Transitive Society. The International Journal of Social Quality. The Role of the State, 9: 1, 32–50. Retrieved from www.berghahnjournals.com/abstract/journals/ijsq/9/1/ijsq.9.issue-1.xml/ DOI: https: // doi.org/10.3167/IJSQ.2019.090103
25. Heyets, V. (2021). Endogenous Social Progress as a Source of Economic Growth. Ekonomista, nr 1. Retrieved from www.ekonomista.info.pl; DOI:10.52335 / dvqigjykfff6
26. Heyets, V., Lunina, I. & Stepanova, O. (2021). The formation of fiscal space while overcoming vaccine nationalism and ensuring sustainability of development. Science and Innovation, 17(1), 29-41. doi.org/10.15407/scine17.01.029
27. Milanovic, В., Lindert, P., Williamson, J. (2007). Measuring Ancient Inequality. Munich Personal RePEc Archive, Paper 5388. Retrieved 19.04.2019 from mpra.ub.unimuenchen.de/5388/1/MPRA_paper_5388.pdf; doi.org/10.3386/w13550
28. Nielsen, R., Hennen, I. et al. (January 2020). Options for Improving e-Participation at the EU Level. Retrieved from www.researchgate.net/publication/337087405_Options_for_Improving_e-Participation_at_the_EU_Level; doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27184-8_13
Сalendar of events
| M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
| 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 |
| 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | ||
