№ 2020/2
Economic terminologyPANCHYSHYN Stepan 1, HRABYNSKA Iryna 2
1Ivan Franko National University of Lviv
2Ivan Franko National University of Lviv
On the domestic terminology of basic economics
ABSTRACT ▼
The article studies the influences of extralinguistic factors that determine the di-rections of formation and development of the domestic terminology of basic economic science. The authors’ approach to structuring the components of the domestic terminology system is proposed, according to which the following are dis-tinguished: a number of commonly used economic terms and concepts; a number of terms used by professional economists; a number of terms that are obsolete and live in the history of economics; a number of terms of natural and social sciences, which entered as a result of the application of interdisciplinary approaches in basic economics; and a number of borrowed foreign terms and concepts.
This approach made it possible to identify and update the semantic and methodological problems of interpretation and application of certain terms and concepts. In particular, the authors substantiate the expediency of supplementing the terminological range of basic economics with such terms as: "unstable economic sys-tem" – to distinguish transitional economic systems, which are characterized by low efficiency of mechanisms that provide stabilization potential of the system; and "financialization", which is used for qualitative and quantitative analysis of the consequences of the gravitational shift of the economic system of industrial capi-talism into financial capitalism.
The purpose of the article is to single out series (groups) of the domestic terminology of basic economics, and to clarify the economic meaning of certain terms and features of this terminology and the need for its standardization and international comparability.
Substantiated the necessity of further terminological modernization, standardization and standardization of the domestic terminology of basic economic science in order to ensure its compliance with the terminological standards of world eco-nomics and further development of Ukrainian economics.
Keywords:terminological system, basic economic science, cost, unstable economic system, financialization, devaluation, benefit.
JEL: A10
| Article in Russian (pp. 99 - 115) | Download | Downloads :263 |
| Article in Ukrainian (pp. 99 - 115) | Download | Downloads :238 |
REFERENCES ▼
1. Blyzniuk, O. P., Ivaniuta, O. M. (2017). Financial Services Market. Kharkiv: KhDUKhT. [in Ukrainian].
2. Bobrov, Ye. A. (2007). The Role and Place of the Financial Services Market in the Structure of the Financial Market. Finansy Ukrainy – Finance of Ukraine, 4, 88-94 [in Ukrainian].
3. Golubovska, І. О. et al. (2016). Terminology variation: approaches to learning . Linguistics XXI century. Kyiv. URL:
nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/-linds_2016_2016_3 [in Ukrainian].
4. Hrytsenko, А. (2001). Evolution of the cost. Ekonomika Ukrainy – Ukraine economy, 4, 44-55 [in Ukrainian].
5. Hrytskiv, A. V. (2004). Inter-system interaction as a factor of term formation (on the example of English-speaking financial terms): author. diss... for the sci-ences. degree of cand. philol. sciences: special. 10.02.04 "Germanic Lan-guages". Lviv [in Ukrainian].
6. Krasnopolska, N. L. (2016). Terminologization and determinologization in the Ukrainian management terminology. Zapysky z Ukrainskoho Movoznavsta – Notes on Ukrainian linguistics, 23, 32-40 [in Ukrainian].
7. Kryzhanovska, A. V. (1987). Actual problems of ordering scientific terminol-ogy. Kyiv: Naukova Dumka [in Ukrainian].
8. Lysa, N. S. Yankova, T. M. (2013). Structural-Semantic Features of Modern Economic Terminology. Doslidzhennia z leksykolohii i hramatyky ukrainskoi movy – Studies in lexicology and grammar of the Ukrainian language, 14, 62-71. Retrieved from
nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/dlgum_2013_14_9. [in Ukrainian]
9. Nepyivoda, N. F. (1983). Determinologization as a result of the interaction of literary and terminological vocabulary: diss. ... cand. philol. sciences: 10.02.02. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
10. Panchyshyn, S. M., Hrabynska, I. V. (2017). On the Typing and Evolution of Economic Systems. Biznes Inform – Business Inform, 8, 29-35 [in Ukrainian].
11. Selivanova, O. O. (2008). Modern Linguistics: Directions and Problems. Pol-tava: Dovkillia-K [in Ukrainian].
12. Mankiw, N. G. (2012). Principles of economics. Mason, OH: South-Western Cengage Learning.
13. Museanu, E. (2013, June). Economic terminology – new perspectives. Eu-ropean Scientific Journal. 1, 253-257. Retrieved from
eujournal.org/index.php/esj/article/viewFile/1254/1263
14. Palley, T.I. (2007). Financialization: What It Is and Why It Matters. Political Economy Research Institute. Working Paper Series, 153.
doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1077923
15. Pearce, D. W. (1999). The MIT dictionary of modern economics. Cam-bridge, Mass: MIT Press.
16. Pugel, T. A. (2016). International economics. Sixteenth edition. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
17. Sawyer, M.C. (2013). What is financialization? International Journal of Polit-ical Economy: a journal of translations, 42: 4, 5-18.
doi.org/10.2753/IJP0891-1916420401
English
Ukrainian 
